Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - GRADING ALL
Permit Number - T09BU00774
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - GRADING ALL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/21/2009 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Set Aside Submittal. An Environmental Resource Report (ERR) in conformance with Development Standard 2-15.3.5 shall be prepared for the entire site to determine the general viability, density, and variety of Protected Native Plants within areas on the site. 2. The natural area percentage must be delineated in a surveyable manner and designated by legal description on a document recorded with the Pima County Recorder. To protect the natural areas, a covenant must be provided with record interest in the natural area in favor of the City of Tucson per LUC 2.8.1.7.D. Submit the required covenant and legal description for review. 3. Submit a copy of the approved SCZ overlay Case # T08SA00370 for reference. The application will be reviewed for compliance when the approved documents are included in the submittal. Revise plans as necessary to comply with the approved SCZ overlay. 4. Indicate on the lower right hand corner of the site plan, the overlay case number, date of approval, and any conditions imposed. |
| 10/05/2009 | MICHAEL ST. PAUL | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | October 5, 2009 Development Services Department Zoning Review Section Michael St.Paul Planning Technician T09BU00774 Grading Plans for T08CM03315 & SCZ T08SA00370 Comments: 1. The grading plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. We cannot verify that the grading plan is in compliance with an approved site plan for this site. Please provide one copy of the stamped approved site plan with your next submittal. The site plan, the SCZ overlay plan and the grading plan must match. 3. Zoning will re-review the grading plan on the next submittal to ensure compliance with the approved site plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming. 4. See comments for site plan (T09CM03315). The Scenic Corridor Zone (T08SA00370) has been approved. |
| 10/15/2009 | ELIZABETH EBERBACH | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | TO: Jeff Stanley PE SUBJECT: New Single-Family Residence - Engineering Grading Plan Resubmittal Review LOCATION: 1475 N Houghton Rd, (T08CM03315) Ward 2, T14S R15E Section2 PARCEL: 133-03-3080 REVIEWERS: CFM, Elizabeth Leibold PE ACTIVITY NUMBERS: T09BU00774, T08CM03315, SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Development Services Department has received and reviewed the Site and revised Grading Plan application for the above referenced property and does not recommend approval of the Grading Plan at this time. The overlay review T08SA00370 is a part of this project. The following comments remain: SITE / GRADING PLAN COMMENTS: 1) The subject property is currently located within a Shaded Zone X 500-year floodplain as shown on the Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM), Community- Panel No. 040073-04019C-2257K, effective date July 24, 2000, and it is acknowledged that a future A Zone may apply after the next series of FIRM's come out during the next year or so. Add statement in the Drainage Statement that the owner has been notified / will be notified that FEMA insurance may apply in the future. 2) Add note to Site Plan that FEMA Flood Insurance may apply in the future. 3) For section A, clarify 77 elevation at rear slope. 4) For section B, clarify driveway slope elevations - as they do not match planview contours. 5) Show any extended pad erosion protection if affected by floodplain. 6) Revise grading limits, and total disturbance area, to include sufficient disturbance area to grade building pad and for any necessary post-grading construction swales along edges of pad for positive drainage. If disturbance during construction exceeds approved limits, additional overlay and plan reviews may be required and may delay the project. 7) Clarify and label spot elevations for driveway from access easement to house. Proposed elevations show discrepancy at connection between existing ingress/egress easement and proposed driveway as the topo indicates 2575 and driveway shows 2577 near the same location. 8) Show IBC code compliance for positive drainage from structures; a minimum of 10-feet for 5% is required per 9) All plans (Overlay, grading and site plan sheets, and SFR Site Plan) must match. All comments posted under the Overlay review, Activity #T08SA00370, must be shown on plans prior to approval. 10) On Landscape Plan/NPPO sheet, assure floodplain information matches overlay, site and grading plan sheets. 11) Add note to site plan that any construction for this lot after upcoming effective date of the expected future FIRM panel designation to Zone A may require a LOMR submittal and approval prior to approval of further permits. 12) Add a note to the grading plan that as-built plans are required prior to final grading approval. As-builts shall show at minimum as-built FPE, as-built FFE, and elevations for pipe inverts within property boundary. For resubmittal, please provide the 2 copies of the revised grading plans with supporting documents including revised drainage statement, revised site and grading plans, response letter, and any other supporting documentation. I can be reached at 837-4934 if you have questions. Elizabeth Leibold, PE Civil Engineer Engineering Division Development Services Department |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/22/2009 | CINDY AGUILAR | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 10/22/2009 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |