Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: GRADING
Permit Number - T09BU00774
Review Name: GRADING
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/10/2009 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | Submit a copy of the approved site plan including landscape and native plant preservation plans for reference. The grading application will be reviewed for compliance when the approved plans are included in the submittal. Revise grading plans as necessary to comply with the approved documents. |
| 06/10/2009 | MICHAEL ST. PAUL | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | June 10, 2009 Development Services Department Zoning Review Section Michael St.Paul Planning Technician T09BU00774 Grading Plans for T08CM03315 & SCZ T08SA00370 Comments: 1. The grading plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. We cannot verify that the grading plan is in compliance with an approved site plan for this site. Please provide one copy of the stamped approved site plan with your next submittal. 3. Zoning will re-review the grading plan on the next submittal to ensure compliance with the approved site plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming. 4. See comments for site plan (T09CM03315) and Scenic Corridor Zone (T08SA00370). |
| 06/25/2009 | ELIZABETH EBERBACH | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: June 25, 2009 TO: Jeff Stanley PE SUBJECT: New Single-Family Residence - Engineering Grading Plan Review LOCATION: 1475 N Houghton Rd, (T08CM03315) Ward 2, T14S R15E Section2 PARCEL: 133-03-3080 REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM, Elizabeth Leibold PE ACTIVITY NUMBERS: T09BU00774 SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Development Services Department has received and reviewed the Grading Plan application (T09BU00774) for the above referenced property and does not recommend approval of the Grading Plan at this time. The following information is required: GRADING PLAN COMMENTS: 1) Clarify General Note # 6 on the grading plan sheet regarding 100-year floodplain conditions for site, and any need for an elevated finish floor, based on hydrology report. Although the subject property is located within a Shaded Zone X 500-year floodplain as shown on the Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM), Community- Panel No. 040073-04019C-2257K, effective date July 24, 2000, there may be local 100-year floodplain. 2) TC Sec.26-5: Provide an engineering study prepared by a state-registered professional civil engineer that addresses the requirements outlined in section 26-5.2 if it is determined by the civil engineer that this property is affected by a regulatory 100-year floodplain. Provide hydrology report addressing the following items: a) Show existing culverts entering/exiting site from offsite watersheds. b) Label type, size, length, and inverts for pipes in report exhibit and on site/grading plan. c) Explain impact of potential flow from these pipes and proposed FFE. d) Describe floodplain conditions for this property. 3) Provide 2 separate cross section through the house (North-South and East-West) showing all dimensions, setbacks, elevations (existing and proposed), etc to verify conformance with the grading standards and to show any extended pad erosion protection if affected by floodplain. 4) Revise the grading plan sheet to label the proposed spot elevations on the plan to show access road elevations, drainage, slopes and driveway access to the proposed residence. 5) Plans may be titled Site/Grading Plan for resubmittal if all the grading information is provided on plans. Otherwise separate grading site plan sheets are acceptable. 6) Provide total disturbance area. 7) Label driveway material. Label spot elevations for driveway showing all-weather access from access easement to house. 8) If pad is in a jurisdictional floodplain show minimum 25-ft pad setbacks per Floodplain Ordinance. 9) Label minimum FFE for proposed house if it is within a jurisdictional floodplain. 10) All plans (Overlay, grading and site plan sheets, and SFR Site Plan) must match. All comments posted under the Overlay review, Activity #T08SA00370, must be shown on plans prior to approval. 11) Topography does not reflect conditions for site. Revise. Show elevated access road at frontage and to north of proposed house. 12) On Landscape Plan/NPPO sheet, assure floodplain information matches overlay, site and grading plan sheets. 13) Utility easements are shown at location of entrance to (4)24-in CMP pipes. Relocate so that there is no conflict with conveyance area for pipes. For resubmittal, please provide the 2 copies of the revised grading plans with supporting documents including hydrology report, floodplain use permit application if applicable, response letter, and any other supporting documentation. I can be reached at 837-4934 if you have questions. Elizabeth Leibold, PE Civil Engineer Engineering Division Development Services Department |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 07/01/2009 | THAUSER1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 07/01/2009 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |