Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - GRADING ALL
Permit Number - T09BU00580
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - GRADING ALL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/02/2010 | MICHAEL ST. PAUL | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | September 7, 2010 Development Services Department Zoning Review Section Michael St.Paul Planning Technician T09BU00580 Grading Plans for T09CM00922 Third Review Comments: 1. The grading plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. We cannot verify that the grading plan is in compliance with an approved site plan for this site. Please provide one copy of the stamped approved site plan with your next submittal. 3. See comments T09CM00922. Be aware that this site is in the Hillside Development Zone (HDZ). 4. Zoning will re-review the grading plan on the next submittal to ensure compliance with the approved site plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming. |
| 09/07/2010 | ELIZABETH LEIBOLD | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | TO: Timothy Robertson, RA SUBJECT: 977 S Bill Martin Dr Site/Grading Plan Review 2ND Resubmittal LOCATION: Canyon View at Starr Pass lot 28 REVIEWER: Elizabeth Leibold PE ACTIVITY NUMBERS: T09CM00922 / T09BU00580 Summary: Engineering Division has reviewed the submitted plan review package including a copy of the grading plan. Not all comments were addressed. Engineering does not recommend approval until the remaining comments are addressed. SITE / GRADING PLAN COMMENTS: 1) DS Sec.11-01.4.C: Address remaining clarification/notations that will be required for grading plan: a) For temporary erosion/sediment control, locate all silt fence within grading limits. b) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.19: Label the edge of existing sidewalk for Bill Martin Drive along lot property boundary area. c) DS Sec.2-02.2.11: Address the remaining driveway comments: i) Provide cross section from driveway to street across side slope with proposed slope grades. Clarify cut/fill condition and provide spot elevations at west edge of driveway. ii) Label type and show erosion protection along edge of driveway. d) DS Sec.11-01.10.5: South yard at base and top of cut slope still needs clarification. Address the remaining comments: i) Clarify spot elevations in rear yard and within top and bottom interceptor swales directing runoff away from proposed house and around the yard. Provide spot elevations in rear yard indicating/clarifying positive flow out of the rear yard. Show how design will prevent stormwater runoff into or ponding in the west, south and east yard areas. Minimum 10-ft at 5% from structure is required per IBC. ii) A note is shown on plans stating that an interceptor swale is to be located at the top of rear slope however insufficient area is shown at top of slope. Clarify with dimensions and spot elevations and provide sufficient width on plans for the area needed for the interceptor swales that are required at top of cut slopes. Capacity for interceptors shall have a minimum of 30-in wide and 12-in deep. Show how stormwater runoff flow is intercepted and label erosion protection on a detail for rear yard interceptor swale and depict the area with dimensions on planview. e) DS Sec.9-04.3.1.A.2, Land Use Code (LUC) Sec. 2.8.1-I: Assure sufficient grading area is provided for grading construction of lot 28. Label locations within the driveway or yard areas for construction staging areas, construction materials, and vehicle parking. 2) A geotechnical report is referenced on the plans. If there are any proposed slopes that exceed 3:1(H:V) geotechnical report is required. Submit geotechnical report for the project or subdivision. 3) DS Sec.9-04.3.3.A: Add note to details that all rip rapped slopes shall have handplaced stone with filter fabric. 4) Clarify and label bearings, distance, and curve data for the lot lines, as well as labeling protected peak delineation within lot boundary, to match Final Plat. 5) Call to discuss inclusive home design requirements/process. 6) Add distance tie from building corner to property corner. It will be necessary to have a phone conversation or set up a meeting to go over comments before resubmittal. For resubmittal, please provide 2 copies of the site/grading plans with supporting documents including a copy of the geotechnical report, redlines, and response letter. I can be reached at 837-4934 if you have questions. Elizabeth Leibold, PE Civil Engineer Engineering Division Planning & Development Services Department |
| 09/08/2010 | CAGUILA1 | NPPO | REVIEW | Needs Review |