Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: GRADING
Permit Number - T09BU00494
Review Name: GRADING
Review Status: Completed
Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
04/24/2009 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Submit a copy of the approved landscape plan for reference. The grading application will be reviewed for compliance when the approved documents are included in the submittal. 2. Ensure that all Engineering comments and concerns are addressed. |
04/28/2009 | BIANCA RAMIREZ | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: April 28, 2009 SUBJECT: Site Only TO: Jaca Design LOCATION: 4301 S 6th Ave, T14S, R13E, Sec 36, Ward 5 REVIEWERS: Bianca Ramirez, CFM ACTIVITY: T09BU00494 (First Review) RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Grading Plan; Hydrologic/Hydraulic Report Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the grading plan and Hydrologic/Hydraulic Report. Grading Plan: 1. Verify that all Sight Visibility Triangles have been labeled and depicted correctly per D.S. 2-02.2.1.10. Label site visibility triangles on each sheet. Provide SVTs for driveway along 2. Please provide Drainage patterns and finished grades on site plan per D.S. 2-02.2.1.16. 3. DS Sec.2.02.2.1.A.16: Provide drainage arrows and locations of all concentration points. Specifically show roof down spout locations proposed buildings at pedestrian circulation areas. A detail for the dimension of the proposed scuppers that are used for collecting onsite roof drainage at all pedestrian sidewalk is required; refer to City of Tucson details. Any scuppers proposed under the sidewalk will be designed and constructed to convey the 10-year flood flow. Provide a drainage statement showing scupper calculations that demonstrate that the 10-year flood flow is contained under the sidewalk. Provide this information on the site plan. 4. DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.19: Label the 9-foot future sidewalk and curb area on the site plan to verify that all improvements are located outside of the future ROW. Verify that the dimensions are called out on each sheet. Add label that states future sidewalk on future site plan. 5. A permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information. 6. Please show a typical cross section of the P.A.A.L. or call out the percentage of slopes. Call out the grade break at the driveway, if applicable. Call out the height of the curb on the site plan within the details. 7. Verify that sidewalk dimensions called out on site plan(s) match. 8. Label curb on site plan. 9. Dimension setback from water harvesting areas to proposed building. 11. Grading plan clearly marked "GRADING PLAN". 12. Add the following notes to the grading plan notes: - "The approved Grading Plan is the only acceptable construction plan onsite. The Contractor may not use any other plans, such as the approved Tentative Plat and/or Development Plan, for construction purposes. The Contractor may ask the Development Services Inspector to consult with the other approved plans for additional information or details that might not be included on the approved grading plan but needed for completion of work." 13. Additional comments may be forthcoming. Hydrologic/Hydraulic Report: 1. Provide Geotechnical Report for minimum setback recommendations and perc tests. Provide setback from the building and have distance called out on site plan. 2. Revise drainage report and project design to meet the minimum critical basin requirements per 10-01.2.1. Detention is required; show calculations for water harvesting that demonstrate that water harvesting areas will suffice. Show that water harvesting calculations are in accordance with the Water Harvesting Guidance Manual (p. 28-31). 3. Additional comments may be forthcoming. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 837-4928 or Bianca.Ramirez@tucsonaz.gov Bianca C. Ramirez Engineering Associate City of Tucson/Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 837-4928 office (520) 879-8010 fax |
05/07/2009 | MICHAEL ST. PAUL | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | May 7, 2009 Development Services Department Zoning Review Section Michael St.Paul Planning Technician T09BU00494 Grading Plans for T08CM02288 Comments: 1. The grading plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. In order to verify that the grading plan is in compliance with an approved site plan for this site, please provide one copy of the stamped approved site plan with your next submittal. 3. Zoning will re-review the grading plan on the next submittal to ensure compliance with the approved site plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming. |
Final Status
Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
---|---|---|---|
05/08/2009 | GERARDO BONILLA | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
05/08/2009 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |