Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: GRADING
Permit Number - T09BU00163
Review Name: GRADING
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/11/2009 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | 02/11/2009 Development Services Department Zoning Review Section Terry Stevens Lead Planner Comments: 1. The grading plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning could not verify that the grading plan was in compliance with the approved site plan. Please submit two copies of the approved and stamped site, landscape, and NPPO plans with the next grading plan submittal. 3. Zoning will re-review the grading plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved and stamped site plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming. |
| 02/23/2009 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | February 24, 2009 T09CM00265 and T09BU00163 Provide a comparison of existing and proposed water surface elevations to demonstrate that the project will not cause adverse impacts on the adjacent properties. Clearly show and discuss the impact of this development on the existing buildings on the UofA property. Show the FFE of the northern building. The drainage report doesn't clearly show the split flow in the off-site discharge. Include information about the size of the existing swale in the drainage exhibits. Show the location, dimensions and grades for the swale on the adjacent property that is conducting the majority of the regulatory flood discharge. Explain how that this will be perpetuated into the future. The access and to the refuse collection location doesn't meet the requirements of the development standards. The access routes to and from the refuse collection location must provide a minimum outside radius of 50 feet and a minimum inside radius of 36 feet. Show the accessibility and maneuverability routes on the site plan. Provide clear specifications, location and alignment of the basin outlet. If the basin outlet must be installed into the adjacent private drainageway, show agreements with the adjacent property owner allowing the construction and maintenance of the outlet structure. This plan is presented as a site and grading plan which is acceptable. Provide sufficient construction details for the various features on the site. Show general dimensions and construction details and specifications for all drainage structures, rip rap areas, basins, refuse enclosures and other construction features. For example, show the locations of the required bollards protecting the side walls and the gates for the enclosure. Clearly show the proposed grades for tops and toes of all slopes in representative locations. Show how water harvesting and detention basins will hold the amount of water called for in the drainage report. Note that a floodplain use permit is required for this project. Submit a completed Floodplain Use Permit application along with the $50.00 application fee and $150 drainage review fee. Continue to include copies of the SWPPP with subsequent submittals and revise as necessary to remain consistent with the site and grading plans. |
| 02/24/2009 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | Ensure that all Engineering comments and concerns are addressed. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 03/11/2009 | DELMA ROBEY | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 03/11/2009 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |