Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: PIA SUBMITTAL
Plan Number - T08PI00027
Review Name: PIA SUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/29/2008 | SMONTIE1 | UTILITY CLEARANCES | COT STREETS DIVISION | Denied | Please submit "Utility Clearance Letters". |
| 09/29/2008 | SMONTIE1 | UTILITY CLEARANCES | COT WATER NEW DEVELOPMENT | Denied | Please submit "Utility Clearance Letters". |
| 09/29/2008 | SMONTIE1 | UTILITY CLEARANCES | PC WASTEWATER MGMT | Denied | Please submit "Utility Clearance Letters". |
| 09/29/2008 | SMONTIE1 | UTILITY CLEARANCES | QUEST COMMUNICATION | Denied | Please submit "Utility Clearance Letters". |
| 09/29/2008 | SMONTIE1 | UTILITY CLEARANCES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER CO | Denied | Please submit "Utility Clearance Letters". |
| 09/29/2008 | SMONTIE1 | UTILITY CLEARANCES | COX COMMUNICATION | Denied | Please submit "Utility Clearance Letters". |
| 09/29/2008 | SMONTIE1 | UTILITY CLEARANCES | SOUTHWEST GAS CORP | Denied | Please submit "Utility Clearance Letters". |
| 09/29/2008 | SMONTIE1 | UTILITY CLEARANCES | EL PASO NATURAL GAS | Denied | Please submit "Utility Clearance Letters". |
| 09/29/2008 | SMONTIE1 | UTILITY CLEARANCES | KINDER MORGAN ENERGY | Denied | Please submit "Utility Clearance Letters". |
| 10/01/2008 | GARY WITTWER | DOT LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | Please identify any plant or irrigation impacts on Oracle. Match existing concrete replacement. The medians on Roger should be colored concrete. (no planting) |
| 10/20/2008 | RICHARD LEIGH | DOT ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | October 17, 2008 SUBJECT: Oracle Road and Roger Road, Offsite Improvements for Catalina View Center, PIA T08PI0027 PROJECT REVIEWER: Richard Leigh, DOT, Permits and Codes Section RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Permits and Codes Section has reviewed the PIA Plan and does not recommend approval of the PIA Plan at this time. The following comments need to be addressed in the next submittal. 1. Include the plan number "I-2008-028" in title block of each sheet. 2. Include Development Services Department PIA activity number "T08PI00026"on cover sheet. 3. Include Oracle Road and Roger Road in Title of plan. 4. Show and label all existing utility infrastructure (poles, cabinets pull boxes, etc.) within the right-of-way and indicate as to their disposition if enchroacing. 5. Provide a dimensioned detail of each type of curb access ramp proposed. 6. Use standard abbreviations per PC/COT Standard detail 101. 7. Indicate curve data for proposed median islands and all curb returns. 8. Include a signature line for ADOT on the cover sheet. 9. Include applicable COT PIA Paving and General Notes in plan (see attached). 10. Use standard COT north arrow (see attached). 11. Proposed storm drains within the public rights-of-way must be of reinforced concrete. 12. Provide a dimensioned pavement structural detail for each differing roadway sections. 13. Sheet 2, Detail A, B & C: Incorrect curb type called out. 14. Sheet 2, Detail E: Reference PC/COT Std. Dtl. 205.5. Barricade railing must be placed outside of the sidewalk area and sidewalk scupper should extend 1' beyond the width of the sidewalk width. Provide stationing for the proposed sidewalk scupper at the Roger Road entrance (two entrances on Roger Road). 15. Provide complete details for the proposed Bus Shelter. 16. Provide a concrete bus pad per ADOT Standard Detail C-05-50. Depict and call out in plan view and provided complete details. 17. Provide complete details for the proposed drainage structures and connections. 18. Storm drain junctions and modifications must designed per the Standards Manual for Drainage Design for the City of Tucson. 19. Provide valley gutters, per PC/COT SD 208, across all driveway entrances. 20. Sheet 5: Indicate the finished surface treatment for the proposed median island in Roger Road. 21. A catch basin with a combination curb and grate inlet will have to be provided at Sta. +/- 7+62, LT Rodger Road. 22. Provide a curb terminal section, per PC/COT Std. Dtl. 212, at Sta. 7+13, LT Roger Road. 23. Provide a detail of the opening in the median island located at Sta. +/- 8+17 Roger Road. Additionally was this opening sized appropriately to prevent ponding in the left turn lane? 24. Provide A detail of the median opening for the pedestrian access at Sta. +/- 9+59 Roger Road. Additionally, indicate the placement of detectable warning strips. 25. Indicate construction limits for proposed sidewalk along Oracle Road and Roger Road. 26. The lateral transition of the sidewalk at Sta. +/- 151+85 Oracle Road exceeds the maximum allowable (3 longitudinal and 1 lateral). A pedestrian access easement may have to be provided in order lessen angle. 27. Provide a hydraulic analysis of the storm drain system to compute the hydraulic grade line. Refer to redline plans for additional comments and comment details. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 837-6647 or Richard.Leigh@tucsoz.gov |
| 10/28/2008 | LANCE PETERSON | DOT STREET MAINTENANCE | REVIEW | Denied | We have reviewed this plan and have the following comments: 1. The medians on Oracle Road appear to be affected. Please provide the proposed details to Paul Rosenboon at 4004 S. Park Ave Bld #2. Is the plan to hardscape the median on Oracle as well as the median on Roger? 2. Is there any proposed landscaping for this project. If so, please submit the landscape plan to Paul Rosenboom at 4004 S. Park Ave. Bld #2 for review. 3. Sheet 5 & 6 - Is there concrete planned for behind the sidewalk scuppers? If not, what is the proposed erosion control? 4. All work in the city right of way needs to be coordinated with Paul Rosenboom at 791-3154 ext 234, to prevent damage to the exiting landscaping and irrigation. 5. I have given one of my plan sets to Ernie Encinas, Transportaion Superintendent, so that he could review the electrical portion of the plans. Please contact him at 791-3154 for comments. |
| 11/04/2008 | JOSE ORTIZ | DOT TRAFFIC | REVIEW | Denied | November 4, 2008 ACTIVITY NUMBER: T07PI00027 PROJECT NAME: Catalina View Center PROJECT ADDRESS: 4040 N Oracle Rd PROJECT REVIEWER: Jose E. Ortiz PE, Traffic Engineer Resubmittal Required: Traffic Engineering does not recommend approval of the PIA Plan; therefore a revised PIA Plan is required for re-submittal. The following items must be revised or added to the plan. In addition to the comments below traffic signal comments will be provided at a later date. 1. Include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed. 2. See redlines on the submitted drawings and address the additional redline comments. During the next submittal please re-submit the roll of redlines for back checking purposes. 3. Due to the number of redlines a meeting is required with city staff to discuss redlines and design options. 4. Coordination with ADOT is required. Provide verification that ADOT accepts the off-site improvements. If needed City staff is willing to attend any meetings held with ADOT and the developer to streamline the review process between both jurisdictions. 5. There are 17 notes required from sheet 2-1 of the Pavement Marking Design Manual (2nd edition 2008). 6. Provide an end median signage treatment per PCDOT & TDOT Signing Manual (2002) Chap 9-4A & 9-4B. 7. Provide a 'RIGHT LANE' (R3-5F) supplemental plaque under the new (R3-5R) Roger Road. 8. Place the PIA and CDRC Case number on the cover sheet. 9. Add the following Signing General Notes 5(a) & 5(b) per PCDOT & TDOT Signing Manual (2002) (Chapter 1, Sheet 12) to the Plans. 10. Add the following Pavement Marking/Striping General Notes to the Plans: 'ALL STREET STRIPING & SIGNAGE TO BE COORDINATED WITH C.O.T. TRAFFIC ENGINEERING CALL 791-4259 A MINIMUM OF 48 HOURS PRIOR TO THE INSTALLATION OR REMOVAL OF ANY SIGNAGE OR STRIPING. ALL REQUIRED STRIPING AND SIGNAGE WILL BE INSTALLED AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. NEW STRIPING TO BE THERMOPLASTIC MATERIAL. USE 2" SQUARE-TUBE POST AND SQUARE TUBE POST FOUNDATIONS FOR SIGNING. BARRICADE PLAN MUST BE SUBMITTED TO THE CITY OF TUCSON TRAFFIC ENGINEERING FOR APPROVAL 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF ANY WORK IN PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY.' 'ALL NON-SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION STREET NAMES MUST HAVE E-W BLOCK NUMBER ADDRESSES FOR E-W ROADWAYS AND N-S BLOCK NUMBER ADDRESSES FOR N-S ROADWAYS.' 'THE CITY SHALL NOT BE LIABLE FOR ANY ERRORS AND/OR OMISSIONS ON THESE PLANS. ITEMS NOT MEETING CITY STANDARDS SHALL BE REPAIRED/REPLACED BY THE DEVELOPER/CONTRACTOR AND AT NO COST TO THE CITY.' 'ALL WARNING SIGN PANELS SHALL BE FLUORESCENT YELLOW DIAMOND-GRADE (DG-CUBED OR EQUIVALENT) SHEETING. ALL SCHOOL ZONE SIGNS SHALL BE FLUORESCENT YELLOW-GREEN DIAMOND GRADE (DG-CUBED OR EQUIVALENT) SHEETING. ALL OTHER SIGN PANELS SHALL HAVE HIGH INTENSITY PRISMATIC TYPE IV SHEETING.' If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-4259 x76730 or Jose.Ortiz@tucsonaz.gov |
| 11/17/2008 | SMONTIE1 | PIA COORDINATOR | CUSTOMER CALLED | Completed | |
| 11/17/2008 | SMONTIE1 | PIA COORDINATOR | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |