Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: PIA SUBMITTAL
Plan Number - T08PI00020
Review Name: PIA SUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07/31/2008 | SMONTIE1 | UTILITY CLEARANCES | COT STREETS DIVISION | Denied | Please submit utility clearance letters. |
| 07/31/2008 | SMONTIE1 | UTILITY CLEARANCES | COT WATER NEW DEVELOPMENT | Denied | Please submit utility clearance letters. |
| 07/31/2008 | SMONTIE1 | UTILITY CLEARANCES | PC WASTEWATER MGMT | Denied | Please submit utility clearance letters. |
| 07/31/2008 | SMONTIE1 | UTILITY CLEARANCES | QUEST COMMUNICATION | Denied | Please submit utility clearance letters. |
| 07/31/2008 | SMONTIE1 | UTILITY CLEARANCES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER CO | Denied | Please submit utility clearance letters. |
| 07/31/2008 | SMONTIE1 | UTILITY CLEARANCES | COX COMMUNICATION | Denied | Please submit utility clearance letters. |
| 07/31/2008 | SMONTIE1 | UTILITY CLEARANCES | SOUTHWEST GAS CORP | Denied | Please submit utility clearance letters. |
| 07/31/2008 | SMONTIE1 | UTILITY CLEARANCES | EL PASO NATURAL GAS | Denied | Please submit utility clearance letters. |
| 07/31/2008 | SMONTIE1 | UTILITY CLEARANCES | KINDER MORGAN ENERGY | Denied | Please submit utility clearance letters. |
| 08/12/2008 | Blanca Espino | DOT ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | PIA Plan 1. Please include a detail letter of explanation with the next submittal indicating where and how revisions were made. Single word responses are unacceptable. Include plans/redlines from previous plan submittal. 2. Sheet 1; Indicate the Book & Page recording information for each street. 3. In title block, add assigned I-Plan Number, I-2008-022 to all sheets. 4. Indicate assigned DSD activity number T08PI00020 above title block. See redlines. 5. Sheet 2, Note #35; Remove. 6. Sheet 2, Dtl. 5, Lettering size is equal to or greater than 1/8 inch in height (125 point). Correct. 7. Sheet 2, Dtl. 7, Indicate the thickness amount for the A.C. & A.B. or callout to see Pavement Structural detail #. 8. Sheet 3, Dtl. 1 & Sheet 4, Details 1 & 2; Hinge points of cut and fill slopes must have a minimum setback of two feet from right-of-way. (Slope on private side). D.S. 11-01.9.0 (9.2, 9.3 & Figure 2). See redlines. 9. No private utilities, irrigation facilities or backflow preventors are allowed in right-of-way. 10. Sheet 3, Dtl. 2 and Sheet 4 Dtls. 3 & 4; All handicap ramps must be A.D.A. compliant. 11. A continuous slope of 2% max will be provided for the accessible route cross slope and running slope from handicap ramp to handicap ramp. Indicate percent slope. See redlines. 12. Sheet 4, Dtl. 4 cannot be modified to fit proposed design. A new constructed handicap ramp will be designed to fit the proposed 30' Radius curb return and connect with the existing sidewalk and proposed 10' paved pathway. Submit the documents of approval for the 30'R curb return and the 10' A.C. paved pathway in place of sidewalk. 13. Sheet 4, Dtl. 6; show a fully dimensioned detail on how the concrete spillway and proposed handicap ramp will be constructed. Will the west curb connect to the existing sidewalk? Please show and or explain. 14. Sheet 4, Details 1 & 2; dimension for the 1-foot Trim, Tack, Join & Meet existing. Graphically delineate area along 44th St. 15. Sheet 4 & 5, Profile; indicate the percent slope and identify line symbols. See redlines. 16. All Easements, dedications, right-of-way should be depicted in plan view and labeled with recordation information (docket/page or plat book/page). The approved Development Plan D08-0005, Sheet 2, Note #29 and Detail 2 indicates a proposal of a 0.5' Pedestrian Pathway Encroachment on the property are contained within a public access easement recorded at Docket___ Page___. Indicate the docket & page. 17. See redlines for additional corrections. |
| 08/18/2008 | LANCE PETERSON | DOT STREET MAINTENANCE | REVIEW | Denied | We have reviewed this plan and have the following comments: 1. What will be the asphaltr mix used for the paving will it be a mix #2 or mix #3? 2. Will there be any landscaping installed with this project? If so, please submit the landscape plan to Paul Rosenboom at 4004 S. Park Ave Bld #2 for review. 3. Sleeves must be installed or extended for all existing irrigation at all handicap ramps and driveways. 4. Existing irrigation and plant details are not shown on the plans. Paul Rosenboom 791-5279 ext 234 can answer questions regarding landscape requirements. No further comments. |
| 08/19/2008 | GARY WITTWER | DOT LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. There are existing irrigation lines, trees and tree grates that need to be shown on the existing condition sheet. 2. There are existing concrete headers and pavers that need to be shown on the existing condition sheet. 3. Please submit a landscape and irrigation plan that will address items 1 and 2 above. How will they be impacted and how are you proposing to mitigate. The City wishes to keep trees in these locations. 4. Submit a hardscape plan to show how the paving patterns will be kept and blend with the theme of the streetscape. The porkchop should be filled with pavers to match hardscape. 5. Call 837-6618 for irrigation information and location. |
| 09/03/2008 | JOSE ORTIZ | DOT TRAFFIC | REVIEW | Denied | September 3, 2008 ACTIVITY NUMBER: T08PI00020 PROJECT NAME: 6TH Avenue & 44TH Street PROJECT ADDRESS: 3390 S 6th Avenue PROJECT REVIEWER: Jose E. Ortiz PE, Traffic Engineer Resubmittal Required: Traffic Engineering does not recommend approval of the PIA Plan; therefore a revised PIA Plan is required for re-submittal. The following items must be revised or added to the plan. 1. Include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed. 2. See redlines on the submitted drawings and address the additional redline comments. During the next submittal please re-submit the roll of redlines for back checking purposes. 3. Provide a minimum 10' wide right turn lane and ensure that the proposed right turn lane will not effect the final lane configuration of the proposed capital improvement re-striping project 4. Provide a 'RIGHT LANE' (R3-5F) supplemental plaque under the new (R3-5R) along 6th Avenue. 5. Place the PIA and CDRC Case number on the cover sheet. 6. Add the following Pavement Marking/Striping General Notes to the Plans: 'ALL STREET STRIPING & SIGNAGE TO BE COORDINATED WITH C.O.T. TRAFFIC ENGINEERING CALL 791-4259 A MINIMUM OF 48 HOURS PRIOR TO THE INSTALLATION OR REMOVAL OF ANY SIGNAGE OR STRIPING. ALL REQUIRED STRIPING AND SIGNAGE WILL BE INSTALLED AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. NEW STRIPING TO BE THERMOPLASTIC MATERIAL. USE 2" SQUARE-TUBE POST AND SQUARE TUBE POST FOUNDATIONS FOR SIGNING. BARRICADE PLAN MUST BE SUBMITTED TO THE CITY OF TUCSON TRAFFIC ENGINEERING FOR APPROVAL 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF ANY WORK IN PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY.' 'THE CITY SHALL NOT BE LIABLE FOR ANY ERRORS AND/OR OMISSIONS ON THESE PLANS. ITEMS NOT MEETING CITY STANDARDS SHALL BE REPAIRED/REPLACED BY THE DEVELOPER/CONTRACTOR AND AT NO COST TO THE CITY.' If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-4259 x76730 or Jose.Ortiz@tucsonaz.gov |
| 09/04/2008 | SMONTIE1 | PIA COORDINATOR | CUSTOMER CALLED | Completed | |
| 09/04/2008 | SMONTIE1 | PIA COORDINATOR | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |