Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - T08OT01498
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/05/2008 | BIANCA RAMIREZ | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | September 5, 2008 T08OT01478 T08BU01134 The residential building plan and floodplain use permit are not approved at this time. The notes from the zoning reviewer indicate that approval from the board of adjustment will be required for approval. The engineering division will not approve the plan pending the board of adjustment decision. The following comments will also need to be addressed: 1. Revise or remove the section on the site plan labeled as "Gradable Area." This section indicates a parcel size in excess of 30,000 square feet. The lot is much closer to 7,500 square feet. Provide the correct lot size and coverage calculation. 2. Provide a note indicating that the parcel is within a flood hazard area identified by the city engineer and that all development will require a floodplain use permit. 3. The shed is a separate structure from the carport and house and may require separate treatment. If the shed is allowed to remain where it is, no further floodplain review will be required for the shed. If the shed is moved, it will be required to meet current floodplain standards by being elevated or by providing and certifying the presence of flood vents. If flood vents are used the certification must indicate that the shed is constructed of materials that will not be damaged by floodwaters to the level of the regulatory flood elevation and that the shed will not be used to store hazardous materials. If the scope of work is not changed, the floodplain use permit will be approved once the above conditions have been met and the variance has been approved by the board of adjustment. Loren Makus loren.makus@tucsonaz.gov |
| 09/05/2008 | BIANCA RAMIREZ | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | Donald Clemons; Independent Drafting is acting as the walk thru. Cost estimate submitted exceeds the 50% value of the structure. Asked applicant to sumbit the project so we can write another letter per Lorens previous comments for substantial improvements. JG |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12/03/2008 | DELMA ROBEY | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |