Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - SITE ALL
Permit Number - T08OT00312
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - SITE ALL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/17/2008 | DAVE MANN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 04/23/2008 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Approved | Previous Review Comments: D) On sheet 3, detail D, revise the location of the free-standing handicapped sign, as it will be hit by vehicle overhang Relocate signs also on sheets C-1.1 Vicinity Map, C-1.2 both plans, F) On sheet 3, detail D, please dimension the handicapped access aisle. The Access Isle is not dimensioned. |
| 04/23/2008 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. In the response comments it is stated that a Design Development Option (DDO) application has been submitted. Provide a copy of the approved DDO plans slong with the approval letter. Add the DDO case number to the lower right hand corner of all plan sheets and add a general note to the site plan indicating the date of DDO approval, what the DDO was for, and any conditions imposed. 2. The tree well detail "H" on sheet C 1.3 indicates a wheel stop is to be placed in front of the planter areas but the site plan and landscape plan do not indicate wheelstops in these areas and show that there is not room to accomodate one. A 2-1/2 foot overhang for vehicles must be provided for vehicle overhang to prevent vehicles from striking and damaging tree trunks. Dimension parking spaces clearly to show how the trees within the planter areas will be protected by curbing and still allow enough length of parking space to accomodate vehicles outside of the PAAL. 3. It is still unclear if this is project is proposed as a condominium plat. Response comment 7 indicates that the landscape border is to be recorded as common area. However, if this is a single parcel and is not being submitted as a plat it is not necessary to record common areas. If this is to be a subdivision plat it must be submitted though the CDRC for review as a plat. Clarify or revise plans if necessary. 4. Changes to the site plan must be reflected on the landscape plan. |
| 04/28/2008 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | Changes to the landscape plan or site plan must be reflected on the Native Plant Preservation Plan. |
| 05/06/2008 | HEATHER THRALL | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Heather Thrall Senior Planner PROJECT: T08OT00312, 2102 N. Ralph Avenue 5 new apartment units Commercial Site plan, 2nd Review TRANSMITTAL DATE: May 6, 2008 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with redlines and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. Per DS 2-02.2.1.6, regarding buildings: A) note height is from GRADE to flat roof then note height from grade to top of parapet. 2. Per DS 2-02.2.1.8, regarding parking: A) increase type size for fine info. on van accessible sign detail to 12 point for microfilm 3. Per DS 2-02.2.2.A.3, Lot coverage is to be provided in percentage form, and should include all vehicle use area and building footprint. I only see building data provided. Please revise to include the square footage of vehicular use area. 4. Please note that depending upon the responses provided, further review comments may be forthcoming. I may be reached at Heather.Thrall@tucsonaz.gov or at 837-4951. IF YOU WISH, EMAIL ME FOR A COUNTER APPOINTMENT TO HAVE THE REVISION REVIEWED, RATHER THAN A FULL RESUBMITTAL. HCT C:\planning\site\DSD\T08OT00312 2102 n Ralph 2.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised site plan |
| 05/12/2008 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 05/15/2008 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 15. Provide the rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole. Determine the need for a backwater valve per Section 710.1, UPC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 05/16/2008 | CPIERCE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 05/16/2008 | CPIERCE1 | REJECT SHELF | Completed |