Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL NEW
Permit Number - T08CM03970
Review Name: COMMERCIAL NEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/05/2009 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 01/06/2009 | SUE REEVES | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Passed | |
| 01/06/2009 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | Clarify which plumbing code is being used for this activity; sheet T0.01 specifies the UPC but the plumbing sheets reference the IPC. Use of the IPC will require an appeal to the Building Official. |
| 01/06/2009 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 01/07/2009 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Each roof top air conditioning unit is equipped with a power exhaust to allow the modulation of the outside air while maintaining the building pressurization. As a result, RTU-1, RTU-2, and RTU-4 all circulate 2100 CFM through the return ducts and the exception to Section 606.2, IMC 2006 that exempts units returning 2,000 CFM or less from the smoke detector requirement is not applicable. 2. Provide energy code compliance calculations for the building envelope. Reference: Section 101.4, International Energy Conservation Code 2006. |
| 01/13/2009 | RAY MAJUTA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 12/26/2008 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. DEFERRED SUBMITTALS MUST BE APPROVED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL. 2. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS PAGE 10: MOMENT FRAME REFERS TO COMPUTER CALCULATIONS. PROVIDE THOSE. 3. SHEET S2.1; SCHEDULES: IS THIS A "BRICK" WALL SCHEDULE OR A BLOCK WALL? CLARIFY. 4. SHEET S3.1; CALCULATIONS: DID NOT FIND CALCULATIONS FOR LINTELS. PROVIDE. 5. SHEET S3.1; CALCULATIONS: DID NOT FIND CALCULATIONS FOR LEDGERS. PROVIDE. 6. SHEET S4.1; SECTION 106: NOTE TO LEFT OF WALL INDICATES "CONCRETE STEM WALL", WHILE NOTE TO RIGHT INDICATES "BRICK WALL". IS THIS BLOCK? CLARIFY. 7. SHEET S4.1; SECTION 104: "BRICK" OR BLOCK? CLARIFY. 8. SHEET S4.1; SECTION 106: WALL INDICATES #4 VERTICALS AT 16" OC WHILE SCHEDULE ON SHEET S2.1 INDICATES #5 AT 16" OC. CLARIFY. 9. SHEET S4.1; CALCULATIONS: DID NOT FIND CALCULATIONS FOR LINTELS. PROVIDE. 10. SHEET A1.00; ARCHITECTURAL FLOOR PLAN: UNDER "PARTITION TYPES", WALL A MUST MEET CRITERIA OF 2006 IBC SECTION 1607.13. PROVIDE DETAILS INDICATING BRACING AT TOP OF WALL, INCLUDING BRACE SIZE AND SPACING, BRACE CONNECTION TO TOP OF WALL AND TO ROOF STRUCTURE. PROVIDE CONNECTION OF WALL TO FLOOR SLAB. |
| 12/26/2008 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Denied | Please provide site plan showing existing fire hydrant location(s). Hydrant should be within 500' (as the hose lays - around obstructions, etc.) of all parts of the new building. A new hydrant may be required. |
| 12/30/2008 | BIANCA RAMIREZ | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 12/30/2008 | ERIC NEWCOMB | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Approved |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 01/15/2009 | THAUSER1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 01/15/2009 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |