Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL TI
Permit Number - T08CM03822
Review Name: COMMERCIAL TI
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12/08/2008 | JOHN WILLIAMS | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Completed | Impact Fee's Do Apply; Central District; 10,650 Square Feet; $39,785.15* *52,852.70 if Permit pulled on or after 1.16.09 which includes police, fire, and public facility fee's |
| 12/09/2008 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 12/12/2008 | RONALD BROWN | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 12 DECEMBER 2008 T08CM03822/NEXT CARE-URGENT CARE REVIEWED BY RON BROWN STRUCTURAL/ACCESSIBLE REVIEW 2006IBC/ICC ANSI 117.1 DENIED: SEE COMMENTS BELOW A. SHEET A1.0 1. AS PER DSD PERMIT REVIEW STANDARDS, LETTERING FOR ALL DRAWINGS IS TO BE A MINIMUM OF 1/8" IN HEIGHT. 3/32" FONT SIZE MAY BE USED IF APPROVED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL. EITHER CHANGE ALL LETTERS TO 1/8" OR PROVIDE AN APPROVED APPEAL FOR 3/32" USAGE FROM THE BUILDING OFFICIAL. 2. UNDER PROJECT INFORMATION CHANGE THE ACCESSIBLE CODE TO 2006 IBC/ICC ANSI 117.1. 3. OCCUPANT LOAD AS PER 2006 IBC, TABLE 1040.1.1 IS BASED UPON GROSS SQUARE FEET WHICH CHANGES YOUR OCCUPANT LOAD FROM 32 TO 42. B. SHEET A2.1: 1. THE DRINKING FOUNTAIN LAYOUT DESIGN IS NOT THE SAME AS REFERENCED ELECTRIC WATER COOLER DETAIL 7/A6.1. CHANGE FLOOR PLAN TO MATCH CODE COMPLIANT DETAIL AND PROVIDE CLEAR SPACE AS REQUIRED BY ICC ANSI 117.1, SECTION 602. C. SHEET A4.1: 1. AT DETAIL 4: THE BREAK ROOM SINK NEEDS TO BE 2'-10" ABOVE FINISHED FLOOR. D. SHEET M0.1: 1. PROVIDE STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS AND MOUNTING DETAILS FOR THE NEW, ROOF TOP MOUNTED, MECHANICAL UNIT 3. END OF REVIEW |
| 12/24/2008 | RAY MAJUTA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | SEE ATTACHED LETTER |
| 12/30/2008 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 12/30/2008 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. The specified drinking fountain (Elkay EZS4) does not meet the accessibility requirements as shown in Section 1109.5, IBC 2006. 2. Provide water supply isometrics. Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006. 3. Limit the water velocity to less than 8 fps for the copper piping. Reference: Section A 6.1, UPC 2006 and IAPMO IS 3-2003, Section 610.0. 4. Coordinate the call outs for the heat pumps; the mechanical has HP-1(E), HP-2 (E), and HP-3 (N) but the plumbing plan has HP-1 (N), HP-2 (N), HP-3 (E), and HP-4 (E). |
| 12/30/2008 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | Provide information to show how the condensate drain system for HP-1 and HP-3 has been sized. Reference: Section 307.2.2, IMC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson. |
| 12/31/2008 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Approved |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 01/12/2009 | THAUSER1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 01/12/2009 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |