Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL NEW
Permit Number - T08CM03738
Review Name: COMMERCIAL NEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/06/2009 | JOHN WILLIAMS | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Completed | |
| 05/11/2009 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 05/20/2009 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Section R4-30-304 of the Rules of the Arizona State Board of Technical Registration, states that a notation shall be placed beneath the seal, either written, typed, or electronically generated, that provides the day, month, and year of the expiration of current registration. (Effective March 8, 2008). 2. The 2006 International Energy Conservation Code Local Amendments is the relevant code for this project. 3. Demonstrate energy code compliance using calculations based on the current code. Provide the assembly U-factor for the skylight and the SHGC for the windows and the skylight. Reference: Section 101.4, International Energy Conservation Code 2006. 4. Provide a programmable thermostat for the rooftop unit per Section 503.2.4.1, IECC 2006. 5. Specify the minimum resistance (R-value) of the duct insulation to be used on this project. Reference: Section 503.2.7, IECC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson. 6. Provide the installed weight of the rooftop equipment along with structural details and calculations to verify that the new roof is capable of supporting the dead load due to the installation of the roof top unit. Reference: Section 302.1, IMC 2006. 7. Condensate drains may not terminate at or over a plumbing vent. Reference: Section 307.2.1, IMC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson and Section 311.4, UPC 2006. 8. Provide calculations demonstrating adequate ventilation. Reference: Section 403.1, IMC 2006. 9. Provide information on the sequence of operation for the restroom exhaust fans to show that recirculation of the air from the restrooms will not occur. Reference: Section 403.2.1, IMC 2006. 10. Ventilation for restrooms in public spaces requires a minimum of 75 CFM of mechanical exhaust per water closet or urinal. Reference: Table 403.3, IMC 2006. 11. Revise the mechanical design as required to avoid using the corridor as a return air duct. Reference: Section 601.2, IMC 2006. |
| 05/21/2009 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | To: Anthony D'Auria DATE: May 21, 2009 10614 E. Kay Gartrell Place Tucson, Arizona 85747 Subject: Accounting Office, 7802 E. Escalante Rd. Site plan T08CM03738 (First Review) T14S, R15E, Section 32 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Site Plan and Drainage Statement. The Site Plan (SP) and Drainage Statement (DS) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Site Plan: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the SP. 2. A site plan is required for all developments…….per D.S. 2-02.1.2. Provide a site plan w/ the building plans upon the re-submittal. 3. The site plan serves as a document on which conditions of development are recorded. The approved site plan is kept on file at the Development Services Department (DSD) as part of the permanent record for the subject site and is used as a comparison document when building plans are being reviewed. Any modifications to the approved site plan, which change the design, require a new review and approval. Certificate(s) of Occupancy will not be issued until the development of the site meets the conditions of the most currently approved site plan. 4. Adhere to Site Plan Content and Specifications per D.S. 2-02.0.0. 5. Please provide property description per D.S. 2-02.2.1.3. 6. Please label lot dimensions and bearings per D.S. 2-02.2.1.5 7. Label existing and future sight visibility triangles per D.S. 2-02.2.1.10. 8. Please list estimated cut & fill quantities per D.S. 2-02.2.1.17. 9. Please show dimensioned right-of-way, including any applicable Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Plan right-of-way per D.S. 2-02.2.1.19. 10. Please provide existing topographic contours at intervals not exceeding two (2) feet and/or spot elevations as pertinent and Bench Mark based on City of Tucson Datum, including City Field Book and page number per D.S. 2-02.2.1.23. 11. Show Building plan number (T08CM03738) on all sheets per D.S. 2-02.2.1.29. Drainage Statement: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DS. 2. A Drainage Statement is a brief description of drainage conditions applicable for a site which are not affected by 100 year flows of 100 cfs, of more……per S.M.D.D.F.M., chap. II, 2.1.2. The DS must be submitted along with the site plan and accepted with the approval of the grading plan. 3. The content and format of the Drainage Statement should follow S.M.D.D.F.M., chap. II, 2.2. 4. Show the project address or administration address on the cover sheet of the DS. 5. If applicable, add the basin(s) maintenance responsibility note and checklist per S.M.D.D.F.M. 2.3.1.6 C 1 and 2 to the DS. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 837-4932 or Paul.Machado@tucsonaz.gov Paul P. Machado Senior Engineering Associate City of Tucson/Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 837-4932 office (520) 879-8010 fax C:/7802 E. Escalante Rd. Blgd&site |
| 05/21/2009 | RICK MYERS | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. on sheet A-8 Sewer Riser Diagram, See 311.4 2006 UPC no vent pipe shall be used as a soil or waste pipe, nor shall any soil or waste stack be used as a vent. Also, 908.1 Wet venting is limited to vertical drainage piping receiving the discharge from the trap arms of one and two fixture units... Also, see 1001.1 not more than one trap shall be permitted on a trap arm. 2. Reference 707.4 2006 UPC Each horizontal drainage pipe shall be provided with a clean-out at its upper terminal. |
| 05/21/2009 | RMYERS1 | WATER | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 05/27/2009 | RAY MAJUTA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 06/01/2009 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | 06/01/2009 Development Services Department Zoning Review Section Terry Stevens Lead Planner Comments: 1. The building plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning could not verify that the building plan was in compliance with the approved development plan. Please submit two copies of the approved and stamped development, landscape, and NPPO plans with the next building plan submittal. 3. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved site/development plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 06/01/2009 | GERARDO BONILLA | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |