Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE
Permit Number - T08CM03684
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11/17/2008 | DAVE MANN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 11/17/2008 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | DSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Bergdahl Construction T08CM03684 Site Plan (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: November 18, 2008 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. This site plan was reviewed for compliance with the City of Tucson Development Standards (D.S.) and Land Use Code (LUC) for full code compliance for the proposed parking area only. 2. Provide a copy of the last approved site plan with your next submittal. 3. D.S.2-02.2.1.A.5 Provide the lot dimensions and bearings for the proposed lot split on the plan. 4. D.S.2-02.2.1.A.7 Provide setback dimension from all existing buildings to the proposed property lines. 5. D.S.2-02.2.1.A.8 Provide a fully dimensioned detail for both a standard vehicle parking space on the plan. On the detail provide a dimension for the location of the proposed wheel stop. The 2'-4" shown on the plan does not meet the requirements of D.S. 3-05.2.3.C.2 which requires 2'-6". 6. D.S.2-02.2.1.A.12 The proposed backup spur shown on Plan Detail 1/Sheet B-1 does not meet the requirements of D.S. 3-05.2.2.D. The backup spur must be the full width of the parking area access lane (PAAL). A Development Standard Modification Request (DSMR) is required. 7. D.S.2-02.2.1.A.12 Alternative Plan Detail 2/Sheet B-1, Does not meet the requirements of LUC Table 3.3.7-I of 24'-0" wide PAAL for perpendicular (90 degree) parking. A Board of Adjustment for Variance would be required to use this detail. This detail would also require additional dimensions to all sides of the proposed planter prior to approval. 8. D.S.2-02.2.1.A.20 If applicable provide the recordation information on the plan for all existing and proposed easements. 9. D.S.2-02.2.1.A.28 Provide the existing zoning of the parcel located on the west side of Los Altos Avenue. 10. D.S.2-02.2.1.A.31 Provide the existing and proposed use on the plan. The existing use should be called out as "MULTI FAMILY" and the proposed use should be called out as "FAMILY DWELLING "K", SUBJECT TO: SEC. 3.5.7.1.F. 11. D.S.2-02.2.1.A.32 Show the location for the refuse containers on the plan. 12. D.S.2-02.2.2.A.6 Provide a vehicle use area expansion calculation on the plan. 13. Additional comments may be forth coming depending on how each comment has been addressed. 14. In regards to the proposed lot split, once all the above comments have been addressed, a new work flow for the lot split will need to be started and approval stamps are needed from Engineering, Structural, and Plumbing prior to Zoning providing the OK to Record. Once Zoning has given the OK to Record you will need to record the new legal descriptions, a warranty or quick claim deed will be needed to record these documents. Once everything is recorded and the maps change you will need to secure new addressing certificates for both parcels. Return to Zoning will all recorded documents and the address certificates to finish the lot split. Three (3) additional copies of the plan are required for the lot split. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956. C:\planning\site\t08cm03684. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised site plan and additional requested documents. |
| 11/19/2008 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Denied | 19 NOVEMBER 2008 T08CM03684/BERGDAHL CONSTRUCTION REVIEWED BY RON BROWN ACCESSIBLE REVIEW 2006 IBC/ICC 117.1 SEE COMMENTS BELOW A. DENOTE GOVERNING ACCESSIBILITY CODE; 2006 IBC/ICC 117.1 FOR PRIVATE PROPERTY, DENOTE RIGHT OF WAY ACCESSIBILITY STANDARDS; COT DOT STANDARDS FOR CURB RAMPS AT DRIVE WAY ENTRANCES. B. NEED PREVIOUSLY APPROVED SITE PLAN C. PROVIDE AND IDENTIFY ACCESSIBLE ROUTE THROUGHOUT SITE TO ALL BUILDING ENTRANCES AND EXITS AND PARKING FACILITIES AND TO NEAREST PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION POINT AS PER ICC 117.1, SECTION 402 1. PROVIDE SPOT GRADES THROUGH OUT ACCESSIBLE ROUTE AND ACCESSIBLE PARKING SHOWING SLOPE COMPLIANCE WITH 1CC 117.1, SECTIONS 403.3 AND 502.5 D. ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES: 1. PROVIDE ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES AS PER 2006 IBC SECTION 1106. INSURE 1 OF EVERY 6 TO BE "VAN ACCESSIBLE". IDENTIFY SUCH. USE 8' WIDE AISLE FOR 8' WIDE VAN SPACE OR 5' AISLE AND 11' VAN SPACE; 2006 IBC, SECTION 1106.5; ICC 117.1, SECTION 502.2. 2. PROVIDE LARGE SCALE DETAILS SHOWING DIMENSIONS, SIGNAGE, AISLE, CONCRETE WHEEL STOPS, ACCESSIBLE ROUTES, CURBS, RAMPS, AND DETECTABLE WARNINGS AS REQUIRED E. PROVIDE LARGE SCALE DETAIL OF ALL DIFFERENT TYPES OF CURB/SIDE WALK RAMPS WITHIN THE PROPERTY LINE COMPLYING WITH 2006 IBC, SECTION 1010 AND ICC 117.1, SECTIONS 405 AND 406. PROVIDE ALL REQUIRED DETECTABLE WARNINGS AS REQUIRED. F. PROVIDE R.O.W. CURBS COMPLYING WITH COT DOT STANDARDS. G. PROVIDE ALL NECESSARY MARKED CROSSINGS AS REQUIRED FOR A COMPLETE ACCESSIBLE ROUTE. H. PLEASE DESIGN ALL ACCESSIBLE CONCRETE WALK WAYS TO BE SEPARATED FROM VEHICLE PAVING AS PER ZONING REQUIREMENTS. END OF REVIEW |
| 11/24/2008 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Submit previously approved site plan for reference. 2. The site plan must be accompanied by a landscape plan with information specified in 3. Development Standard 2-07.0. The site plan and landscape plan must show identical site layout to avoid conflict between the two plans. 4. Submit a landscape plan to verify the parking lot meets minimum requirements. 5. A street landscape border, per Sec. 3.7.2.4 of the LUC, is a landscape area with a minimum width of ten (10) feet, running the full length of the street property line(s) bounding the site except for points of ingress-egress. 6. Fifty (50) percent or more of the street landscape border area must have shrubs and vegetative ground cover per LUC 3.7.2.4. 7. Indicate square footage of all landscaped areas and calculation of the percentage of vegetative coverage per DS 2-07.2.2.2.g. 8. One (1) canopy tree must be provided for every thirty-three (33) linear feet of landscape border per LUC 3.7.2.4. 9. The planting plan and layout calculations will include Ultimate size of plants indicated by the spread of canopy, circumference of shrubs, or spread of ground cover. 10. A 5' wall is required to screen vehicle use area from adjacent residential properties per LUC Table 3.7.2-I. 11. Within a vehicular use area, one (1) canopy tree is required for each 10 motor vehicle parking spaces and every parking space shall be located within forty (40) feet of the trunk of a canopy tree (as measured from the center of the tree trunk) per LUC 3.7.2.3.A.1. 12. Landscape plan shall include irrigation specification design and layout per DS 2-06.5.4.A & DS 2-06.5.4.B including source of irrigation, sleeves for driveways and sidewalks, locations of valves, low-flow bubblers or drip irrigation. 13. All landscape areas will be depressed to accept water flow from roofs, PAAL, and parking areas. Show by detail or spot elevations how landscape areas will accommodate water harvesting. 14. Submit Application for Exception; include acceptable documentation, which clearly indicates that the project will not impact Protected Native Plants. 15. Additional comments may apply. |
| 11/24/2008 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | Submit Application for Exception; include acceptable documentation, which clearly indicates that the project will not impact Protected Native Plants. |
| 12/03/2008 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: December 5, 2008 SUBJECT: 2622 N Los Altos Ave Site Plan- Engineering Review TO: Calvin and Susan Bergdahl LOCATION: T13S R13E Sec36 Ward 1 REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM ACTIVITY: T08CM03684 (Site Plan) SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Development Services Department has received and reviewed the Site Plan (T08CM03684) for the above referenced property. Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the Site Plan application at this time. The following items need to be addressed: SITE PLAN COMMENTS: 1) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A: Revise the site plan to provide an Owner section with contact information; name, address and telephone contact number for the listed owner of the site. 2) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.5: Provide the recordation information with the COT approved lot reconfiguration for the subject parcel. Provide the new lot dimensions and bearings for each proposed lot on the revised site plan. The Zoning Department prior to site plan approval must approve all lot reconfiguration. The lot combination must be approved prior to site plan approval. 3) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.8: Revise the site plan to label and dimension the proposed vehicular use area to verify that it meets the minimum requirements of DS Sec.3-05. Provide the dimensions for the proposed parking spaces, back up spurs, PAAL widths, and curb radii proposed. Alternative plan Detail #2 does not meet the space requirements or PAAL width requirements per this section. 4) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.8: Revise the site plan to clearly dimension wheel stop barrier or curbing for the parking spaces located along any adjacent landscape areas and/or pedestrian circulation paths. The barriers are to be set at 15.5-feet to accommodate the required 2.5-foot overhang to prevent encroachment or damage to the proposed landscape area and/or the required clear 4-foot pedestrian path. The proposed site plan shows a dimension of 2 feet 4 inches, revise. 5) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.8: Revise the site plan to provide dimensions for the proposed back-up spur with a minimum of 3 feet in depth, a 3-foot radius, and a 3 foot separation between curb and any proposed pedestrian circulation, walls or unsurfaced areas. Refer to DS Sec.3-05.2.2.D for clarification. If a DSMR is required to reduce the requirements of this section it must be approved prior to site plan approval and the DSMR case number, Development Standard being modified along with any conditions must be noted on the site plan. 6) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.12: Revise the site plan and details to label and dimension the required 5-foot wide sidewalk along the entire street frontage of Los Altos Ave that is shown on the site plan. All new development shall provide a curb and 5-foot wide sidewalks along the entire length of street frontage. 7) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.12: Revise the site plan to provide a detail call out for all proposed handicap access ramps at ingress/egress locations. Revise the plan to show that all proposed handicap access ramps meet the design requirements per Detail 207 Standard Public Improvement. 8) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.12: Refer to comments from Ron Brown, RA Structural Plans Examiner for all handicap and ANSI Standard requirements that apply to this project. 9) DS Sec2-02.2.1.A.16: Provide flow arrows on the site plan to identify drainage patterns for the vehicular use area and for the roof drainage to verify downspout and scupper locations and to verify how the stormwater from the vehicular use area drains into the required landscaping. 10) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.19: Revise the site plan to label Los Altos Ave as a Public Road. Clearly label the centerline of the road. 11) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.20: Revise the site plan to provide the dimensions for all existing (if applicable) or proposed easements that are shown in plan view. All easements of record must be graphically shown on the plan together with recording data and page reference, specifically the new proposed easements A, B and C. These easements must be recorded prior to site plan approval. 12) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.32: Provide a letter of approval from Environmental Services for any change in refuse pick-up. Per the plan it is proposed that this development uses "roller" trash receptacle, verify that Environmental Services approves this method of trash pick-up versus having one on-site container. 13) Review and approval from TDOT Permits and Codes for all improvements within the public right-of-way will be required. A right-of-way use permit application will be required prior to construction. Refer to the following links for TDOT Forms and applications: a) http://www.tucsonaz.gov/dsd/Forms_Fees___Maps/Applications/applications.html / b) http://www.dot.ci.tucson.az.us/engineering/pia.php c) Or contact Thad Harvison at 837-6592 for all additional questions regarding r-o-w. 14) Be advised that a separate building permit will be required for the proposed addition to Apartment #3. This review consists of a site plan review only and not for a building review. Provide a separate building permit application to Development Services for the proposed addition. 15) Revise the site plan to entirely remove all demolished buildings and/or walls. If a demolition permit has already been approved and demolition of the improvements taken place then these should not show up on the current plan, revise. 16) Be advised that further comments may be forth coming on resubmittal of the Site Plan. GENERAL COMMENTS: Please provide a revised Site Plan that addresses the comments provided above. Include a comprehensive response letter and any supplemental information addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments. Enclose "redlines" with the resubmittal package. Further comments may be generated upon resubmittal of the Site Plan review. For questions or to schedule an appointment I can be reached at 837-4929. Jason Green, CFM Senior Engineer Associate Engineering Division COT Development Services |
| 12/23/2008 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 06/02/2009 | GERARDO BONILLA | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 06/02/2009 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |