Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T08CM03677
Parcel: 112045000

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: COMMERCIAL NEW

Permit Number - T08CM03677
Review Name: COMMERCIAL NEW
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
11/18/2008 JOHN WILLIAMS COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING Passed
11/19/2008 SREEVES1 ZONING HC SITE REVIEW Passed COT PROJECT REFERENCE ADA COMMENTS
11/19/2008 TERRY STEVENS ZONING REVIEW Approved
11/21/2008 RONALD BROWN BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. PROVIDE STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS
2. PLEASE CLARIFY EXISTING BUILDING MASONRY MATERIAL, BRICK OR CMU. ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS DEPLICT A BRICK MASONTY SIZE, STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS SPEC OUT 8" MASONRY.
3. PLEASE REMOVE ALL STRUCTURAL DETAILS NOT PERTINANT TO THIS PROJECT.
4. DETAILS 5 AND 7/S1.1 APPEAR TO BE FOR NEW CONSTRUCTION. PLEASE REVISE FOR EXISTING/MODIFIED CONSTRUCTION WHERE REQUIRED.
5. SHOW ADDITIONAL REQUIRED GLASS BLOCK OPENINGS ON THE FOUNDATION PLAN AS PER ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS.
11/21/2008 RBROWN1 ADA REVIEW Denied 1. AS REQUIRED BY THE CITY OF TUCSON, THE OEOP DEPARTMENT AND THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, ALL CITY PROJECTS ARE TO BE IN 100% COMPLIANCE WITH "ADAAG" ACCESSIBILITY REQUIREMENTS. AN APPEAL TO THE BUILDING OFFICIAL FOR RELIEF FROM THE 2006 IBC, CHAPTER 11, SECTION 1101.2 ICC/ANSI 117.1 ACCESSIBILITY REQUIREMENTS FOR "ADAAG" REVIEW HAS BEEN APPROVED AND IS ON PERMENANT FILE FOR THIS PROJECT. PLEAE REMOVE ALL REFERENCE OF/FOR ANSI 117.1 COMPLIANCE.
2. AT INTERIOR ELEVATION DETAIL NUMBER 1/A1.2:
A. CLARIFY OR SHOW MODIFICATION TO
EXISTING/RELOCATED COUNTER AND SINK FOR
AN ACCESSIBLE SINK HEIGHT FROM FINISHED
FLOOR OF 2'-10" AS REQUIRED BY ADAAG,
SECTION 4.19.
B. FLOOR PLANS CALL FOR THE 3
COMPARTMENT SINK TO BE A COUNTER AND
SINK. PLEASE CLARIFY AND REVISE DETAIL
ACCORDINGLY.
C. SHOW LOCATION OF FLUSH VALVE HANDLE FOR
WC
D. PROVIDE PROPER DIMENSIONS FOR BACK
TOILET HAND RAIL, REFERENCE FIG 29.
E. VERTICAL GRAB BAR NOT REQUIRED BY "ADAAG".
12/01/2008 GERRY KOZIOL WWM REVIEW Denied NEED 5TH FLOOR CREDIT EVALUATION
12/17/2008 BIANCA RAMIREZ ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied DATE: November 20, 2008
SUBJECT: Site Plan, Building Plan and Floodplain Use Permit
TO: MPE
LOCATION: 2700 E La Madera Drive, T13S, R14E, Section 32, Ward 3
REVIEWERS: Bianca Ramirez, CFM
ACTIVITY: T08CM03677 (First Review) T08OT02733


RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Site Plan, Building Plan and Floodplain Use Permit

SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Development Services Department has received and reviewed the proposed site plan for the above referenced property. Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the site plan, building plan or floodplain user permit at this time. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal.

Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the SP.

Site Plan:

1. Unable to approve site plan until floodplain use permit requirements have been met.
2. Additional comments may be forthcoming.

Building Plan:

3. Unable to approve site plan until floodplain use permit requirements have been met.
4. Additional comments may be forthcoming.

Floodplain Use Permit:

5. Applicant is to inform Development Services Department - Engineering of proposed method for complying with floodplain requirements. Applicant has (2) options:
A. Construct new construction to the regulatory elevation as determined by Engineering.
B. Provide cost estimate with break down of the material and labor completed by a registered contractor or licensed professional (ie, architect, engineer, etc) to ensure that the improvement does not exceed the maximum 50% improvement. The 50% improvement of the structure is determined by taking the value of the structure, not to include the value of the land. Applicant has the option of hiring an appraiser or using the values determined by the Pima County Assessors office for improvement value.
6. Additional comments may be forthcoming.

If you have any questions, I can be reached at 837-4928 or Bianca.Ramirez@tucsonaz.gov

Bianca C. Ramirez
Engineering Associate
City of Tucson/Development Services Department
201 N. Stone Avenue
P.O. Box 27210
Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210
(520) 837-4928 office
(520) 879-8010 fax


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

DATE: December 17, 2008
SUBJECT: Site Plan, Building Plan and Floodplain Use Permit
TO: MPE
LOCATION: 2700 E La Madera Drive, T13S, R14E, Section 32, Ward 3
REVIEWERS: Bianca Ramirez, CFM
ACTIVITY: T08CM03677 (First Review) T08OT02733

Elevation Certificate Completed so applicant can provide existing finished floor of Ramada/Comfort Station
12/19/2008 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Coordinate the plumbing design shown on sheet P1.1 with the information shown on the site plan and the pressure loss calculations on sheet P2.1, e.g. water meter sizes and locations. Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006.
2. Coordinate the size of the reclaimed water piping serving the two water closets (1-1/4" shown on sheet P1.1) with the information shown on the riser diagram on sheet P2.1, which shows 1-1/2' piping to each water closet. Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006.
3. Revise the site plan to show the extension of the rainwater and the gray water irrigation piping. Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006.
4. Show how the potable water pressure will be limited to less than 80 PSI, Reference: Section 608.2, UPC 2006.
5. Provide a cleanout for the reclaimed water overflow. Reference: Section 707.4, UPC 2006.
6. Clarify the size of the drain line from the gray water tank, it is shown as 2" on 3/P2.1 and 3" on 1/P2.1. Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006.
7. Show the location of the backwater valve (detail 3/P2.1) on the plumbing plan. Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006.
12/19/2008 ROBERT SHERRY MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Show how the community room is capable of maintaining a minimum temperature of 68 F on a design heating day (32 F). Reference: Sections 309.1 and 312.1, IMC 2006.
2. Ventilation for restrooms in public spaces requires a minimum of 75 CFM of mechanical exhaust per water closet. (The fan schedule calls out EF-1 as being for restroom service but the mechanical plan shows it as serving only the electrical room.) Reference: Table 403.3, IMC 2006.
12/19/2008 ROBERT SHERRY WATER REVIEW Approved

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
01/06/2009 DELMA ROBEY OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
01/06/2009 SUE REEVES REJECT SHELF Completed