Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - T08CM03466
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/08/2009 | RAY MAJUTA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 12/12/2008 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | THANK YOU FOR LISTING ON A SHEET BY SHEET BASIS THE CHANGES THAT HAD BEEN MADE TO THE DRAWINGS. HOWEVER, BY REMOVING THE STRUCTURAL SHEETS, THERE ARE MANY ISSUES THAT ARE NOW EVIDENT IN THIS REVIEW. 1. SHEET A2.0; FLOOR NOTE 31: DO NOT REFER TO STRUCTURAL AS IT HAS BEEN REMOVED FROM THIS SET. ADD A PLAN NOTE. 2. SHEET A2.0; STRUCTURAL NOTE 70: DO NOT REFER TO STRUCTURAL. 3. SHEET A2.0; DOOR #3; ENLARGED PLAN 3/A6.2: THE OPENING THROUGH THE EXISTING BLOCK WALL NEAR GRID 1 HAS INCREASED IN WIDTH. PROVIDE STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS/DETAILS TO EXTEND THE EXISTING LINTEL OVER THE NEW OPENING. 4. GENERAL: WHERE NEW OR ENLARGED OPENINGS IN THE EXISTING WALLS ARE ADDED, STRUCTURAL ENGINEER MUST VERIFY BY CALCULATIONS A NEW OR REVISED LINTEL OVER THE OPENING. INCLUDE DETAILS AND SECTIONS AS REQUIRED. 5. SHEET A5.4; DETAIL 4: REMOVE REFERENCE TO STRUCTURAL. 6. SHEET A6.3; SECTION 5: REFERENCED DETAIL 18/A8.2 IS NOT SHOWN ON A8.2. REVISE. 7. SHEET A6.5; DETAILS 4/6/9/10: REMOVE REFERENCE TO STRUCTURAL. 8. SHEET A8.0; DETAIL 35: PROVIDE BRACING AND CONNECTIONS FOR THE TOP OF THE PARTITION WALL TO THE EXISTING STRUCTURE TO RESIST LOADS PER IBC SECTION 1607.13. PROVIDE CONNECTION OF WALL TO EXISTING FLOOR SLAB. 9. SHEET A8.0; DETAILS 2/4/6/9/15/17: REMOVE REFERENCE TO STRUCTURAL. 10. SHEET A7.0; DETAIL 4: THIS SECTION INDICATES A NEW I BEAM AT THE EXISTING ROOF STRUCTURE. IS THIS NEW? IF SO, NEED STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS, SHOW THE BEAM ON THE PLAN, INDICATE SUPPORTS AT ENDS OF BEAM, ETC. 11. SHEET A2.3; ROOF NOTES: REMOVE REFERENCE TO STRUCTURAL. 12. SHEET A3.0; SHEET NOTES: REMOVE REFERENCE TO STRUCTURAL. 13. SHEET A3.1; SHEET NOTES: REMOVE REFERENCE TO STRUCTURAL. 14. SHEET A3.2; SHEET NOTES: REMOVE REFERENCE TO STRUCTURAL. 15. SHEET A4.0; SHEET NOTES: REMOVE REFERENCE TO STRUCTURAL. 16. SHEET A7.0; SECTIONS 1/2/3: SECTIONS INDICATE TRELLIS PER STRUCTURAL. CALCULATIONS ARE REQUIRED FOR THE TRELLIS ROOF, MASONRY SUPPORT WALLS, CONNECTIONS TO THE EXISTING STRUCTURE, ETC. 17. SHEET A7.1; SECTIONS 1/2/3: SEE NOTE 18. 18. SHEET A7.2; SECTION 1: SEE NOTE 18. 19. SHEET A7.0; SECTION 4: METAL WALL STUD SIZE, SPACING, AND CONNECTION TO THE EXISTING STRUCTURE IS REQUIRED, INCLUDING ALL CALCULATIONS AND DETAILS AS REQUIRED. |
| 12/15/2008 | BIANCA RAMIREZ | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 12/24/2008 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 12/30/2008 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Provide all of the plumbing sheets (e.g. P0.1, P3.1, and P4.1) for review. Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006. 2. Revise the water heater detail to show the vacuum relief valve for the storage tank installed per the manufacturer's recommendations (no valve between the vacuum relief and the water heater). Reference: Sections 310.4 and 608.7, UPC 2006. 3. Comment not addressed and the structural drawings have been removed from the drawing set. The structural calculations for the equipment platform do not appear to include the point loads associated with the water heater and water softener. Revise the structural calculations to include the point loads, to show that the water heater and water softener are safely supported. Reference: Sections 310.0 and 314.5, UPC 2006. |
| 12/30/2008 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Provide plans (sheets AC-1, AC-2, and AC-3) dated (i.e. the date that the registrant sealed the drawings) by an Arizona Registrant. Reference: Arizona Revised Statutes 32-125, Board of Technical Registration Rules R4-30-304. 2. Comment not addressed. The approved Appeal to the Building Official allows the use of 3/32-inch font for the drawings, not 1/16-inch font (mechanical and refrigeration sheets). Revise the font size used on the drawings to a minimum of 3/32-inch (all upper case). Reference: Section 106.1.1, IBC 2006. 3. This is not a complete review; further review will be conducted once acceptable plans are submitted. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 01/09/2009 | GERARDO BONILLA | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 01/09/2009 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |