Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - T08CM03466
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11/25/2008 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. WITHOUT FIRST REVIEW SET, THIS SET IS CONFUSING. WHERE PLANS ARE CLOUDED AS 'PERMIT RESUBMITTALS' (SEE SHEET A2.3 FOR EXAMPLE), IT IS NOT CLEAR WHAT IS CHANGED. PROVIDE FIRST REVIEW SET, AND MAKE IT VERY CLEAR ON A SHEET BY SHEET BASIS WHAT IS CHANGING, WHAT IS REVISED, AND WHAT IS EXISTING. IS THE ONLY REVISED ITEM IN THE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS THE MEZZANINE FRAMING PLAN, DETAILS, AND GENERAL NOTES ON S1.0? PLEASE INCLUDE THE FIRST REVIEW SET ALONG WITH THE NEXT SUBMITTAL. THE ORIGINAL 9 BUILDING COMMENTS WERE ADDRESSED AND APPROVED. |
| 11/25/2008 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 11/25/2008 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 11/26/2008 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Approved | NOT A COT PROJECT |
| 12/02/2008 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 12/02/2008 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Provide sheets P1.2 and P2.2 for review. Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006. 2. Comment not addressed. Per Table 402.4(2), IFGC, a demand of 250 CFH at 20 feet developed length requires a 1" pipe. Resize the low pressure gas piping serving AC-7 per Table 402.4(2), IFGC for the specified gas demand and developed length or provide calculations justifying the submitted pipe size. Reference: Section 402.3, IFGC 2006. 3. The water heater and water softener appear to be located on an equipment platform that is located above the fixture outlets. Provide a vacuum relief valve for the storage tank. Reference: Section 608.7, UPC 2006. 4. The structural calculations for the equipment platform do not appear to include the point loads associated with the water heater and water softener. Revise the structural calculations to include the point loads, to show that the water heater and water softener are safely supported. Reference: Sections 310.0 and 314.5, UPC 2006 5. Three-compartment sinks that do not use all of the compartments for food preparation (e.g. pot washing sinks) shall have only the compartment that is required for sanitizing indirectly wasted. (Sinks that are located in an area that cannot be vented, such as a counter or bar, may be indirectly wasted per Section 801.3, UPC 2006.) Reference: Sections 304.0 and 801.2.3, UPC 2006. 6. Show the size, routing, and termination of the condensate drain for AC-9. Reference: Section 307.2, IMC 2006 and Section 814.0, UPC 2006. |
| 12/02/2008 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Provide plans (sheets AC-1, AC-2, and AC-3) sealed and dated by an Arizona Registrant. Reference: Arizona Revised Statutes 32-125, Board of Technical Registration Rules R4-30-304. 2. The approved Appeal to the Building Official allows the use of 3/32-inch font for the drawings, not 1/16-inch font (mechanical and refrigeration sheets). Revise the font size used on the drawings to a minimum of 3/32-inch (all upper case). Reference: Section 106.1.1, IBC 2006. 3. Comment not addressed (sheet AC-1). This project is under the jurisdiction of the City of Tucson; the 2006 International Mechanical Code with Local Amendments is the relevant code for this project. 4. This is not a complete review; further review will be conducted once acceptable plans are submitted |
| 12/04/2008 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Denied | MISSING PLUMBING DRAWINGS, NEED TO RESUBMIT W/ APPROVED SHELL DRAWINGS |
| 12/10/2008 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Needs Review | |
| 12/10/2008 | SREEVES1 | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Needs Review |