Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Number: T08CM03403
Parcel: 105110660

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: COMMERCIAL TI

Permit Number - T08CM03403
Review Name: COMMERCIAL TI
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
10/17/2008 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Approved
10/17/2008 ROBERT SHERRY MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Provide plans sealed by an Arizona Registrant, i.e. sign and date all of the submitted sheets. Reference: Arizona Revised Statutes 32-125, Board of Technical Registration Rules R4-30-304.
2. Revise the font size used on the drawings to a minimum of 1/8-inch (all upper case). Reference: Section 106.1.1, IBC 2006.
3. Provide a copy of the approved drawings for the shell package of the building to establish the existing conditions of the tenant space. Reference: Sections 106.1 and 106.3, IBC 2006
4. Provide mechanical energy code compliance calculations using the correct climate zone for Pima County < 4,000 feet
5. Show the size, routing, and termination of the condensate drains. Condensate drains may not terminate over a roof drain or gutter unless the roof drain or gutter terminates at or above grade in an area capable or absorbing the condensate flow without surface drainage. Reference: Section 307.2, IMC 2006 and Section 814.0, UPC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson.
6. Provide calculations demonstrating adequate ventilation. Note that ventilation for restrooms in public spaces requires a minimum of 75 CFM of mechanical exhaust per water closet or urinal. Reference: Sections 401.2 and 403.3, IMC 2006.
7. Clarify if the massage room falls under the requirements of the City of Tucson ordinance relating to massage establishments.
10/17/2008 RAY MAJUTA ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Needs Review
10/17/2008 ROBERT SHERRY WATER REVIEW Denied Provide a copy of the approved drawings for the shell package of the building to establish the existing conditions with regard to the location and size of the existing water meter and backflow preventer. Reference: Sections 106.1 and 106.3, IBC 2006, and COT Ordinance 9976, http://www.tucsonaz.gov/water/docs/backflow-ord.pdf
10/17/2008 ERIC NEWCOMB BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Approved
10/17/2008 CPIERCE1 WWM REVIEW Needs Review
10/17/2008 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Provide plans sealed by an Arizona Registrant, i.e. sign and date all of the submitted sheets. Reference: Arizona Revised Statutes 32-125, Board of Technical Registration Rules R4-30-304.
2. Revise the font size used on the drawings to a minimum of 1/8-inch (all upper case). Reference: Section 106.1.1, IBC 2006.
3. Provide a copy of the approved drawings for the shell package of the building to establish the existing conditions of the tenant space. Reference: Sections 106.1 and 106.3, IBC 2006.
4. Provide a complete plumbing plan, including the water and waste and vent isometrics. Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006.
5. Provide a design for the mounting shelf for the water heater along with structural calculations to show that the water heater is safely supported. Reference: Sections 310.0 and 314.5, UPC 2006.
6. Show that the location of the reduced pressure backflow preventer conforms to the access and clearance requirements of Section 603.3.4, UPC 2006.
7. Show how the new water and waste piping relates to the existing systems. Reference: Section 101.5.1, UPC 2006.
8. Provide a vacuum relief for storage-type water heaters located above any fixture outlets. Reference: Section 608.7, UPC 2006.
9. Provide pressure-absorbing devices for the water connections to appliances equipped with quick-acting or solenoid valves. Reference: Section 609.10, UPC 2006.
10. Provide a vent for each fixture trap (e.g. the floor drains). Reference: Sections 901.0 and 910.1, UPC 2006.
10/17/2008 JASON GREEN ENGINEERING REVIEW Approved
10/17/2008 DAVE MANN FIRE REVIEW Approved
10/17/2008 ENEWCOM1 ADA REVIEW Passed
10/17/2008 BETH GRANT COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING Needs Review
10/17/2008 ERIC NEWCOMB ZONING HC SITE REVIEW Approved