Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - SITE ALL
Permit Number - T08CM03344
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - SITE ALL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/09/2009 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | DSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Terry Stevens Lead Planner PROJECT: T08CM03344 4701 E. Broadway Site Plan TRANSMITTAL DATE: 1/09/09 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with redlines and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. Keynote #11 (detail E sheet 3) indicates a raised sidewalk along the north side of the proposed building. The response comments indicate this sidewalk is flush with the pavement. Clarify. 2. If the use of the existing north building is General Merchandise Sales "28", subject to: Sec. 3.5.9.2.C, change the use in note #3 and on the building footprint indicate Retail -Take Out Only. 3. This comment must be addressed prior to the site plan being approved. This site contains two (2) separate parcels therefore you will need to show how the parcels can work as stand alone parcels if sold separately or provide a Pima County Tax Parcel Combo and a recorded covenant regarding development and use of real property. Forms may be found at http://www.tucsonaz.gov/dsd/Forms_Fees___Maps/Applications/applications.html If the Pima County Tax Parcel Combo cannot be completed (possibly because of different owners), the covenant regarding development and use of real property must be completed. Provide a copy for review. Provide a note on the plans indicating recording docket and page for the covenant. A document that provides the cross access, parking, and pedestrian circulation will be required to be completed. Add the recordation information (docket and page number) of the document to the site plan. Provide a copy for review. 4. Revise the bicycle parking calculations to show what is being provided. There does not appear to be any class one bicycle parking lockers being provided nor are they required. There appears to be 4 class two bicycle parking spaces being provided. Revise calculations. Provide a dimensioned detail of the class two bicycle parking areas clearly indicating required clearances from the rack and location and size of the access aisle. The access aisle for the rack at the northwest corner of the proposed building appears will interfere with the pedestrian circulation path to the east of the rack. 5. Remove the City of Tucson DSD/CDRC approval stamp from all sheets. This stamp is used only for development plan, plats, etc. not site plans. 6. Based on the response to the above comments and changes to the plans, additional comments may be forth coming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Terry Stevens, (520) 837-4961 C:\planning\cdrc\DSD\T08CM03344-2.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised site plan and additional requested documents |
| 01/12/2009 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Denied | 12 JANUARY 2009 T08CM03344/LUCKY WISHBONE AT 4701 E. BROADWAY REVIEWED BY RON BROWN CODE REVIEW 2006IBC/ICC ANSI 117.1 DENIED: SEE COMMENTS BELOW A. AT NORTH ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE: 1. THE HANDICAP SIGN MUST BE LOCATED OUTSIDE THE BOUNDARIES OF THE PARKING AREA; 18'-0". B. NOTE 13 IS USED TO REFERENCE DOT STANDARD 207. ALL DOT STANDARDS ARE FOR RIGHT OF WAY DEVELOPMENT ONLY. ANY RAMP LOCATED WITHIN THE PROPERTY IS GOVERNED BY THE 2006 IBC/ICC (ANSI) 117.1, SECTION 406. PLEASE PROVIDE A NOTE REFERENCING ICC 117.1, SECTION 406 AND ADD A NEW LARGE SCALE DETAIL OF RAMP SHOWING COMPLIANCE. C. SPOT GRADES SHOW ACCESSIBLE ROUTE NORTH OF THE PROPOSED BUILDING TO BE FLUSH WITH THE PARKING PAVING WHILE NOTE REFERENCE 11 DICTATES A 6" HIGH CURB DIFFERENTIATION. PLEASE CLARIFY. D. AS PER DEVELOPMENT STANDARD 2-08.5.1 (A), ALL WALKWAYS ARE TO BE A MINIMUM OF 4' WIDE: 1. AT THE SOUTHERN END OF THE MARKED CROSSING, THE 2' WIDE DETECTABLE WARNING CUTS THE ACCESSIBLE ROUTE TO ONLY 3' WIDE. PLEASE WIDEN THE WALKWAY TO 4' BEHIND THE DETECTABLE WARNING STRIP. 2. PLEASE WIDEN THE SHORT SECTION OF 3' WIDE WALKWAY AT THE SOUTH EAST CORNER OF THE NEW BUILDING TO 4'. E. CHANGE NOTE 23 TO REFERENCE 2006 IBC/ICC (ANSI) 117.1, SECTION 406.12 END OF REVIEW |
| 01/16/2009 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | Any revisions made to the site plan based on other reviewers' comments must also be reflected on the landscape plan. |
| 02/05/2009 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | February 5, 2009 The site plan will be approved on the next submittal if the following conditions are met: 1. The activity number T08CM03344 is on the site plan in place of "T08CM0XXXX." 2. The "Preliminary Review Not for Construction or Recording" notation is removed from the engineer's seal. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 02/10/2009 | CINDY AGUILAR | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 02/10/2009 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |