Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Number: T08CM03326
Parcel: 13727635B

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: COMMERCIAL TI

Permit Number - T08CM03326
Review Name: COMMERCIAL TI
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
10/10/2008 DAVE MANN FIRE REVIEW Approved
10/10/2008 SREEVES1 ADA REVIEW Passed
10/13/2008 RONALD BROWN ZONING HC SITE REVIEW Passed REFERENCE SITE H/C FOR ACCESSIBLE REVIEW
10/13/2008 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Denied DSD TRANSMITTAL

FROM: Steve Shields
Lead Planner

PROJECT: Grijalva School Park
T08CM03326
Building Plan (1st Review)

TRANSMITTAL DATE: Qctober 13, 2008

1. The building plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed.

2. Zoning could not verify that the building plan was in compliance with the approved site plan. Please submit two copies of the approved and stamped site, landscape, and NPPO plans with the next building plan submittal.

3. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved and stamped site plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956

C:\planning\grading\t08cm03326.doc

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED:
10/13/2008 RONALD BROWN BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 13 OCTOBER 2008
T08CM03326/GRIJALVA SCHOOL PARK - CITY OF TUCSON, PARKS AND
RECREATION DEPARTMENT
REVIEWED BY RON BROWN

ACCESSIBLE REVIEW
STRUCTURAL REVIEW

DENIED: SEE COMMENTS BELOW

SHEET HS2.01
1. AS THERE ARE NO DETAILS AND STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS FOR THE HEXAGON GROUP RAMADA, WE ASSUME IT IS TO BE A DEFERRED SUBMITTAL. ALL DEFERRED SUBMITTALS MUST HAVE APPROVAL OF THE BUILDING OFFICIAL. PLEASE SEND A LETTER OF NOTIFICATION AND APPROVAL TO MR. JESSIE SANDERS, ACTING BUILDING OFFICIAL AND INCLUDE COPY OF APPROVAL CORRESPONDENCE WITH RESUBMITTAL.
SHEET CG1.03
2. NOTE 8 REFERS TO COT STD DTL 213. THIS IS FOR WEDGE CURBS. WEDGE CURBS ARE NOT SHOWN ON ANY OF THE SITE PLANS.

END OF REVIEW
10/16/2008 GERRY KOZIOL WWM REVIEW Passed
10/20/2008 BIANCA RAMIREZ ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied DATE: October 20, 2008
SUBJECT: Site Plan
TO: Steve Hagedorn
LOCATION: 1795 W Drexel Road, T15S, R13E, Section 10, Ward 1
REVIEWERS: Bianca Ramirez, CFM
ACTIVITY: T08CM03326 (First Review)


RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Site Plan, Hydrology and Hydraulic Report

SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Development Services Department has received and reviewed the proposed site plan for the above referenced property. Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the site plan at this time. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal.

Please include a response letter to the commends along with the corrected copies of the site plan.

Site Plan:

1. The most recent aerial photo of the building does not match what is depicted on the site plan. Please modify site plan to represent actual parcel property boundaries on site plan.
2. Please label lot dimensions and bearings per D.S. 2-02.2.1.5.
3. Provide all existing and proposed buildings and structures, including location, size, height, overhangs, canopies, and use per D.S. 2-02.2.1.6.
4. DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.10: Provide existing and future site visibility triangles (SVT), labeled and dimensioned. Refer to DS Sec.3-01.5.3 for line of site matrix for SVTs.
5. Label width of driveways and parking area access lanes (P.A.A.L.) per D.S. 2-02.2.1.11. Dimension driveways and PAALs.
6. DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.11 & DS Sec.3-01.3.2.C: Label radii for concrete curbs per City of Tucson/Pima County Standard Detail 213 (PC/COT SD 213) at the driveway entrance along S Oak Tree Drive
7. Call out radius on plans for curb islands.
8. Please label all width of vehicular, bicycle, pedestrian, and handicapped circulation clearly identified per D.S. 2-02.2.1.12.
9. Please list estimated cut & fill quantities per D.S. 2-02.2.1.17. If not cut and fill is taking place indicate the quantity of zero (0) on the plan. Estimated cut and Fill: Cut = 0 and Fill = 0 will suffice.
10. Please show dimensioned right-of-way for Oak Tree Drive and Drexel Road and lable as public per D.S. 2-02.2.1.19.
12. DS Sec. 2-05.2.4.H.2: Provide the right-of-way (ROW) recordation information for Drexel Road and Oak Tree Drive..
13. Verify that all easement of record have been graphically shown on the plan together with recording docket and page per D.S. 2-02.2.1.20.
14. Dimension from street monument lines to existing and proposed curbs, sidewalks, driveways, and utility lines per D.S. 2-02.2.1.21.
15. Show all fences, walls, or vegetation for screening and sight visibility by type, material, height, location and spacing per D.S. 2-02.2.1.27.
16. Show site plan activity number in the lower right hand corner of each sheet.
17. A permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information.
18. Add note: "Depress all landscaped areas 6" maximum for water harvesting".
19. Provide location of trash pick up along with maneuverability as well as details for trash enclosure or appropriate documentation from Env. Services.
20. Provide spot elevation for flowline of channel to show adequate flow and convayance in channel. Minimum 1% is needed.
21.. Additional comments may be forthcoming.

Hydrology and Hydraulic Report - Approved

If you have any questions, I can be reached at 837-4928 or Bianca.Ramirez@tucsonaz.gov

Bianca C. Ramirez
Engineering Associate
City of Tucson/Development Services Department
201 N. Stone Avenue
P.O. Box 27210
Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210
(520) 837-4928 office
(520) 879-8010 fax
10/23/2008 RAY MAJUTA ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied Project: T08CM03326
Grijalva School Park

The Electrical Plans have been denied for the following items, please address individually and indicate actions taken to resolve them

1.The City of Tucson Outdoor Lighting calculations did not include the four 1000 w HPS lights at the basketball court. Under which exemptiom was this excluded?
2.Provide the fault current figures for the services and panels
3.Provide the schedule and load calculations for the 480 Volt Pedistal which includes 2-20 A 3P breakers and 1-30 A 3p breaker. Note that the load summary on Sheet E5.02 indicates 120 Amps for the Booster Pump Service.
4.The Park Service load is 54 Amps on the load summary,
however Panel A shows 61 Amp load.
5.Panel A Sheet E5.02 shows a load of 20 Amps on circuits 17,19, on a 20 Amp circuit breaker?
6.Note that the Booster Pump will require a disconnect means unless located with-in sight from controller.

RT Majuta
DSDS Elect Plan CK
City of Tucson
10/27/08
520-837-4988
11/03/2008 ROBERT SHERRY MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Passed
11/03/2008 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Provide the civil plans that show the location and size of the water supply piping to the drinking fountain as referenced in Detail 6/HS2.01.
2. Show the location of the connection point to the existing drain line for the drinking fountain being relocated, along with the drain pipe size and invert.
11/03/2008 ROBERT SHERRY WATER REVIEW Denied Revise the drawings to show the location and sizes of the domestic water meter and the backflow preventer.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
12/08/2008 CINDY AGUILAR OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
12/08/2008 SUE REEVES REJECT SHELF Completed