Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - T08CM03315
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/18/2009 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Needs Review | |
| 05/19/2009 | SEPTIC APPROVAL | WWM | REVIEW | Denied | need to submit septic package per Pima Co DEQ |
| 05/22/2009 | ELIZABETH EBERBACH | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: June 5, 2009 TO: Karen Cesare, Jeff Stanley PE SUBJECT: New Single-Family Residence - Engineering Site Plan Review LOCATION: 1475 N Houghton Rd, Ward 2, T14S R15E Section2 PARCEL: 133-03-3080 REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM, Elizabeth Leibold PE ACTIVITY NUMBERS: T08CM03315 (Site Plan) SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Development Services Department has received and reviewed the Site Plan application (T08CM03315) for the above referenced property and does not recommend approval of the Site Plan at this time. The following information is required: SITE PLAN COMMENTS: 1) Clarify General Note # 6 on the grading plan sheet regarding 100-year floodplain conditions for site, and any need for an elevated finish floor, based on hydrology report. Although the subject property is located within a Shaded Zone X 500-year floodplain as shown on the Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM), Community- Panel No. 040073-04019C-2257K, effective date July 24, 2000, there may be local 100-year floodplain. 2) TC Sec.26-5: Provide an engineering study prepared by a state-registered professional civil engineer that addresses the requirements outlined in section 26-5.2 if it is determined by the civil engineer that this property is affected by a regulatory 100-year floodplain. Provide hydrology report addressing the following items: a) Show existing culverts entering/exiting site from offsite watersheds. b) Label type, size, length, and inverts for pipes in report exhibit and on site/grading plan. c) Explain impact of potential flow from these pipes and proposed FFE. d) Describe floodplain conditions for this property. 3) Provide 2 separate cross section through the house (North-South and East-West) showing all dimensions, setbacks, elevations (existing and proposed), etc to verify conformance with the grading standards and to show any extended pad erosion protection if affected by floodplain. 4) Revise the Site Plan and /or supplemental grading plan sheet to label the proposed spot elevations on the plan to show access road elevations, drainage, slopes and driveway access to the proposed residence. 5) A grading permit application is required. Plans may be titled Site/Grading Plan for resubmittal if all the grading information is provided on plans. 6) Provide total disturbance area. 7) All site plans (Overlay Site Plan and SFR Site Plan) must match. All comments posted under the Overlay review, Activity #T08SA00370, must be shown on both site plans prior to approval. 8) Topography does not reflect conditions for site. Revise. Show elevated access road at frontage and to north of proposed house. 9) On Landscape Plan/NPPO sheet, assure floodplain information matches site plan and overlay plan sheets. 10) Utility easements are shown at location of entrance to (4)24-in CMP pipes. Relocate so that there is no conflict with conveyance area for pipes. For resubmittal, please provide the grading permit application, 2 copies of the site/grading plans with supporting documents including hydrology report, floodplain use permit application if applicable, response letter, and any other supporting documentation. I can be reached at 837-4934 if you have questions. Elizabeth Leibold, PE Civil Engineer Engineering Division Development Services Department |
| 05/22/2009 | SREEVES1 | BUILDING-RESIDENTIAL | REVIEW | Needs Review | |
| 06/08/2009 | MICHAEL ST. PAUL | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL FROM: Michael St.Paul, Planning Technician PROJECT: T08CM03315 (T08SA00370 for SCZ & T09BU00774 Grad) 1475 North Houghton Road SFR 2nd review (133-03-3080) TRANSMITTAL: June 9, 2009 COMMENTS: Please attach a response letter with the next submittal, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. This review is for a single family residential (SFR) in the SR zone (LUC Section 2.2.4.2.A.1). The Development Designator is "C" (LUC Section 3.2.3.1.A) and the Perimeter Yard Indicator is BB (LUC Section 3.2.6.4). 2. The statement identifying the SCZ overlay "T08SA00370 - approved / there are not any conditions of approval" is a bit premature. The overlay was denied and has not yet been resubmitted. 3. The overlay must be approved as a condition of site plan approval. 4. Please see the SCZ overlay review T08SA00370. The plot plan and the SCZ overlay plan should be identical. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 06/19/2009 | DELMA ROBEY | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 06/19/2009 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |