Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: REVISION - SITE
Permit Number - T08CM03258
Review Name: REVISION - SITE
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12/02/2009 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 12/02/2009 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | DSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Terry Stevens Lead Planner PROJECT: T09CM03258 202 E. Speedway Blvd. Site Plan - Revision TRANSMITTAL DATE: 12-03-09 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with redlines and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. This plan must be submitted and approved by the HPZ (Historic Preservation Zone) before approval by the zoning department will be granted. 2. Provide on the site plan the future and existing sight visibility triangles for both entrances to this site. 3. Per DS 2-09.3.2 Pedestrian Sidewalks. The bicycle access through the development will be separate from pedestrian ways. The location of the class two bicycle parking spaces does not meet this requirement. A relocation of the bicycle parking is required or a DSMR (Development Standards Modification Request) is required. If DSMR is approved for this project, please add the DSMR number, date of approval, what the DSMR is for and any conditions of approval on the site plan. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Terry Stevens, (520) 837-4961 C:\planning\cdrc\DSD\T08CM03258.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised site plan and additional requested documents |
| 12/04/2009 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 12/07/2009 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | All field revisions have been corrected and/or addded to the plan set per review with the Eng Field Inspector. However the revised plan set must include the sight visiblity triangles at all PAAL entrances as shown on the last approved plan set. Once the new revised sets get stamped approved they become the last approved plan for Record keeping purposes and must have all information per Development Standards 2-02. Once correction is made the plan set can be walked through the counter for stamped aprpoval. Please make arrangements in advance to ensure that I am available prior to coming down, 837-4929. Jason Green, CFM |
| 12/09/2009 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 12/09/2009 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Plans must be submitted and approved by the HPZ Division prior to landscape approval 2. Include previously approved landscape plans for reference. 3. The site plan and landscape plan must show identical site layout to avoid conflict between the two plans. Ensure that all changes to the site plan are reflected on the landscape plan. 4. Additional comments may apply. |
| 12/28/2009 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Provide a clear and complete site utility plan showing, site sewer from the connection to the public sewer to the connections at the building drains. Include locations of clean outs, changes of direction, and location of back water valve(s). Include the size and location of the water meter and the reduced pressure assembly. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 01/04/2010 | CPIERCE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 01/04/2010 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |