Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - T08CM03258
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/18/2009 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS DURING SUBSEQUENT REVIEWS. 2. PREVIOUS COMMENT 3; SHEET G2: CURRENT BUILDING CODE IS 2006 IBC. REVIEW AND REVISE. 3. SHEET A0.2; DETAIL 3: REFER DETAIL TO STRUCTURAL DETAIL 227. VERIFY. 4. SHEET A0.2; DETAIL 4: REFER DETAIL TO STRUCTURAL DETAIL 228. VERIFY. 5. SHEET A0.2; DETAIL 5: CHANGE DETAIL TO MATCH STRUCTURAL. REFER TO STRUCTURAL DETAIL 109. 6. SHEET A7; SHEET S1.5: IF THERE IS TO BE AN OPTION OF METAL OR WOOD WALL STUDS, THE STRUCTURAL PLANS/DETAILS/NOTES MUST ALSO INDICATE THIS. VERIFY AND COORDINATE WITH STRUCTURAL. 7. SHEET A14; TYPICAL ACCESSORY MOUNTING HEIGHTS DETAIL: LOCATE THE VERTICAL GRAB BAR WITH A HORIZONTAL DIMENSION FROM THE WALL PER ICC/ANSI A117.1-2003, FIGURE 604.5.1. |
| 05/19/2009 | ERIC NEWCOMB | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. SEE BUILDING COMMENTS. |
| 06/01/2009 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Comment not addressed. Clarify the relative location of the existing reduced pressure backflow preventer for building water service. If it is located immediately after the existing water meter, a second backflow preventer, located at the new building is not required but if two reduced pressure backflow preventers are installed in series, the pressure drops associated with them shall be included in the water calculations. Reference: Section 27-76, Article V, Chapter XXVII, Tucson Code and Section 610.2, UPC 2006. 2. Comment not addressed. Coordinate the design of the water service piping to the new building as noted on sheet UT-1. The civil drawing shows a 1-1/4" water service but keynotes 1 and 2 call for a 1" service. 3. Comment not addressed. Clarify the size of the roof drain and overflow drain leaders. Sheet A6.1 calls out 8" pipes but detail 1/A6.2 shows 3" pipes. Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2003. 4. Comment not addressed. Revise the roof drainage calculations (A6.1) using the roof data from this activity and the correct code edition. Reference: Section 1106.0, UPC 2006. 5. Comment not addressed. Revise the termination of the secondary (overflow) rainwater leader so that it terminates above grade in a location observable by the building occupants or maintenance personnel. Reference: Section 1101.11.2.2.1, UPC 2006. |
| 06/01/2009 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Comment not addressed, submitted calculations are for Pima County >4,000 feet. Provide energy code compliance calculations (for Pima County < 4,000 feet). Provide sufficient detail on the drawings to evaluate the energy compliance of the building envelope. The information shall, as a minimum, include U-factors of the envelope systems and fenestration components, along with the R-values of the insulation. Reference: Sections 101.4 and 104.2, International Energy Conservation Code 2006. 2. Comment not addressed. If the building energy compliance is not in accordance with ASHRAE 90.1, the duct insulation shall be determined by Section 503.2.7, IECC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson. Reference: Section 501.2, IECC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson. |
| 06/05/2009 | RAY MAJUTA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 06/11/2009 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Approved |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 06/16/2009 | CINDY AGUILAR | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 06/16/2009 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |