Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL TI
Permit Number - T08CM03166
Review Name: COMMERCIAL TI
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/30/2008 | ENEWCOM1 | ADA | REVIEW | Denied | 1. SEE BUILDING COMMENTS. |
| 09/30/2008 | JWILLIA5 | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. SEE BUILDING COMMENTS. |
| 10/01/2008 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. SEE COMMENTS FROM ACTIVITY #T08CM03160. |
| 10/01/2008 | JOHN WILLIAMS | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Completed | |
| 10/02/2008 | DAVE MANN | FIRE | REVIEW | Denied | Please provide location(s) of new and/or existing fire hydrants, with dimensions to property lines. Refer to C.O.T. amendments to the 2006 IFC (section 508) for spacing requirements. Verify occupancy classification with building department. Fire department approved lock box will be required at access gate. Please include the following design criteria to the plans. 1. Flow data (static pressure, residual pressure, GPM) Available from the Fire Department (520) 791-3234 2. The standard to be used in development of sprinkler system. (NFPA 13, NFPA 13R, or NFPA 13D) 3. The hazard classification of the building, including any special hazards. 4. The density required of the water supply. Define where fire sprinklers will be installed, and how they will be supplied. Alley on west side of project does not appear to meet requirements for fire department access . |
| 10/07/2008 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Denied | need 5th floor credit evaluation |
| 10/09/2008 | RAY MAJUTA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | Comments on permit T08CM03160 |
| 10/09/2008 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Needs Review | |
| 10/14/2008 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | DSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: 2835 N Stone Avenue T08CM03160, T08CM03161, T08CM03162, T08CM03163, T08CM03164, T08CM03165, T08CM03166, T08CM03167, T08CM03168 Building Plan (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: October 14, 2008 1. The building plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning could not verify that the building plan was in compliance with the approved site plan. Please submit two copies of the approved and stamped site, landscape, and NPPO plans with the next building plan submittal. 3. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved and stamped site plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956 C:\planning\grading\t08cm03160.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: |
| 10/14/2008 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Section R4-30-304 of the Rules of the Arizona State Board of Technical Registration, states that a notation shall be placed beneath the seal, either written, typed, or electronically generated, that provides the day, month, and year of the expiration of current registration. (Effective March 8, 2008). 2. Provide energy code compliance calculations for the new building addition using the correct location (Pima County <4,000 ft, not Pima, Arizona). Reference: Section 101.4, International Energy Conservation Code 2006. 3. Provide structural calculations to verify that the roof is capable of supporting the additional dead load due to the installation of the roof top unit, RTU-1. Reference: Section 302.1, IMC 2006 4. Show that the termination point for the condensate drain from RTU-1 is to an area that will accommodate the condensate with no surface runoff. Reference: Section 307.2.1, IMC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson. 5. Provide an auxiliary drain pan or secondary drain system for HP-1. Reference: Section 307.2.3 IMC 2006. |
| 10/14/2008 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Section R4-30-304 of the Rules of the Arizona State Board of Technical Registration, states that a notation shall be placed beneath the seal, either written, typed, or electronically generated, that provides the day, month, and year of the expiration of current registration. (Effective March 8, 2008). 2. Provide the total connected load for the gas meter serving this building, the pipe size(s), and the developed pipe length. Reference: Section 1209.1, UPC 2006. 3. Keynote 12 on sheet P141 calls for a Wade model L111 tempering valve; if this is the correct manufacturer, provide listing information for the valve. Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006. 4. Clarify the status of the water heaters (WH-4). Keynote 9 on sheet P141 refers to existing water heaters being reinstalled but water heater schedule on sheet P200 appears to indicate that they are new. 5. Provide a detail of the installation of the WH-4 units, including the means being used to control thermal expansion. 6. Justify the installation of a cap on the vent for the existing backwash drain. Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006. 7. Provide roof drainage calculations and plans. Provide sizing information for the roof scuppers and downspouts. Provide overflow protection for the roof. Reference: Sections 1101.11 and 1106.0, UPC 2006. |
| 10/14/2008 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Denied | Provide a site utility plan showing the location of the reduced pressure backflow assembly and water meter for this building and indicate the sizes of the backflow assembly and water meter. Reference: COT Ordinance 9976, http://www.tucsonaz.gov/water/docs/backflow-ord.pdf |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11/03/2008 | CINDY AGUILAR | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 11/03/2008 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |