Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL TI
Permit Number - T08CM03161
Review Name: COMMERCIAL TI
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/30/2008 | JOHN WILLIAMS | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Passed | |
| 09/30/2008 | ENEWCOM1 | ADA | REVIEW | Denied | 1. SEE BUILDING COMMENTS. |
| 10/01/2008 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. SEE COMMENTS FROM ACTIVITY #T08CM03160. |
| 10/02/2008 | DAVE MANN | FIRE | REVIEW | Denied | Please provide location(s) of new and/or existing fire hydrants, with dimensions to property lines. Refer to C.O.T. amendments to the 2006 IFC (section 508) for spacing requirements. Verify occupancy classification with building department. Fire department approved lock box will be required at access gate. Please include the following design criteria to the plans. 1. Flow data (static pressure, residual pressure, GPM) Available from the Fire Department (520) 791-3234 2. The standard to be used in development of sprinkler system. (NFPA 13, NFPA 13R, or NFPA 13D) 3. The hazard classification of the building, including any special hazards. 4. The density required of the water supply. Define where fire sprinklers will be installed, and how they will be supplied. Alley on west side of project does not appear to meet requirements for fire department access . |
| 10/06/2008 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Section R4-30-304 of the Rules of the Arizona State Board of Technical Registration, states that a notation shall be placed beneath the seal, either written, typed, or electronically generated, that provides the day, month, and year of the expiration of current registration. (Effective March 8, 2008). 2. Indicate the minimum required size of the combined condensate drain pipe for HP-4 and HP-5. Reference: Section 307.2.2, IMC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson. 3. Provide an auxiliary drain pan or secondary drain system for HP-1. Reference: Section 307.2.3 IMC 2006. |
| 10/06/2008 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Section R4-30-304 of the Rules of the Arizona State Board of Technical Registration, states that a notation shall be placed beneath the seal, either written, typed, or electronically generated, that provides the day, month, and year of the expiration of current registration. (Effective March 8, 2008). 2. Provide information to show that the location for WH-3 provides adequate space for maintenance and removal without structural modifications. Reference: Section 309.0, UPC 2006. |
| 10/06/2008 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Denied | Provide a site utility plan showing the location of the reduced pressure backflow assembly (if one serves this building) and water meter for this building and indicate the sizes of the backflow assembly and water meter. Reference: COT Ordinance 9976, http://www.tucsonaz.gov/water/docs/backflow-ord.pdf |
| 10/07/2008 | ERIC NEWCOMB | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. SEE BUILDING COMMENTS. |
| 10/07/2008 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Denied | need 5th floor credit evaluation |
| 10/09/2008 | RAY MAJUTA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | Remarks with permit T08CM03160 |
| 10/09/2008 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Needs Review | |
| 10/14/2008 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | DSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: 2835 N Stone Avenue T08CM03160, T08CM03161, T08CM03162, T08CM03163, T08CM03164, T08CM03165, T08CM03166, T08CM03167, T08CM03168 Building Plan (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: October 14, 2008 1. The building plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning could not verify that the building plan was in compliance with the approved site plan. Please submit two copies of the approved and stamped site, landscape, and NPPO plans with the next building plan submittal. 3. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved and stamped site plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956 C:\planning\grading\t08cm03160.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11/03/2008 | CINDY AGUILAR | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 11/03/2008 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |