Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL TI
Permit Number - T08CM03053
Review Name: COMMERCIAL TI
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/11/2008 | DAVE MANN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 09/11/2008 | RBROWN1 | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | not a cot project |
| 09/11/2008 | RONALD BROWN | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. NEED STRUCTURAL COMPARISION OF REMOVED ROOFING SYSTEM VS NEW ROOFING SYSTEM 2. NEED STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS FOR NEW HVAC UNITS ON ROOF |
| 09/11/2008 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 09/12/2008 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | Coordinate the mechanical and architectural drawings. The architectural drawings call for the installation of 3 rooftop unit but the mechanical (and structural) drawings call for only two rooftop units. |
| 09/12/2008 | LINDA BUCZYNSKI | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | Sarah: At this location I found that the grounding electrodes at the transformers need to be #2, the bond on the secondary of T2 needs to be #4, "KVA" needs to be changed to read "KV" for the 750 KVA transformer (referring to the 30 KV), and "42000" rated IAC for Panel H1 needs to be changed to read "65000" on the panel schedule. These are the same changes we applied to Project T08CM03052. Also, at this location, AC1 and AC2 have a Maximum Overcurrent Protection Device rating of 15A per Sheet M1.0, so the disconnects must be fused for 15A, or we can change the 20A circuit breakers. Also, it is not clear that there is a maintenance receptacle for these, and I might have made the wrong assumption in thinking we were OK in this regard on the other permit. Now, this big ticket item is this: the stubouts to the 750 KVA transformers at both locations imply future secondaries, which makes sense given the size of the transformer. But without knowing whether or not to consider this to be a supervised location, and without knowing the primary protection it is not possible to determine compliance with NEC Table 450.3 (A). Depending on the above, there may be a need for a set of breakers or fuses grouped in one location per Footnote 2. I'd like to discuss this, but I'm scheduled for my exit interview. Don't know how long it will be this PM, but there's still tomorrow!! Linda Buczynski, P.E. Electrical Plans Examiner City of Tucson 520.837.4907 www.cityoftucson.org |
| 09/12/2008 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 09/12/2008 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 09/15/2008 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 10/13/2008 | CAGUILA1 | WWM | REVIEW | Needs Review | |
| 10/13/2008 | BETH GRANT | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Needs Review | |
| 10/13/2008 | CAGUILA1 | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Needs Review |