Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE
Permit Number - T08CM03039
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/10/2008 | DAVE MANN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 09/10/2008 | RBROWN1 | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | NOT A COT PROJECT |
| 09/10/2008 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Denied | 10 SEPTEMBER 2008 T08CM03039/VIDAS SERENAS APARTMENTS REVIEWED BY RON BROWN ACCESSIBLE REVIEW 2006 IBC/ICC 117.1 DENIED: SEE COMMENTS BELOW A. THIS SITE HAS BEEN REVIEWED FOR 100% COMPLIANCE AS PER ZONING DEPARTMENT EVALUATION. B. PROVIDE OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION ON COVER SHEET AS PER 2006 IBC, CHAPTER 3. C. DENOTE GOVERNING ACCESSIBILITY CODE; 2006 IBC/ICC 117.1 FOR PRIVATE PROPERTY. D. PROVIDE AND IDENTIFY ACCESSIBLE ROUTE THROUGHOUT SITE FROM ALL STRUCTURES TO PUBLIC R.O.W., PARKING FACILITIES, COMMON AREAS AS PER 2066 IBC, SECTION 1104 AND ICC 117.1, SECTION 402. E. IDENTIFY ONE OF THE ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES AS "VAN ACCESSIBLE" AS PER ICC 117.1, SECTION 502 ON THE SITE PLAN AND DETAIL 3/C1.2. AISLE TO BE 8' WIDE F. PROVIDE "VAN ACCESSIBLE" SIGN ON THE PARKING SIGN. G. PROVIDE LARGE SCALE DETAIL OF ALL TYPES OF INTERIOR CURB AND SIDE WALK RAMPS SHOWING SIZES, DIMENSIONS, ALL SLOPES, DETECTABLE WARNINGS AS REQUIRED AND COMPLYING WITH 2006 IBC, SECTION 1010 AND ICC 117.1, SECTIONS 405 AND 406. H. THE MARCHED CROSSING FROM STONE AV. TO BUILDING "A" MUST HAVE DETECTABLE WARNING STRIPS AT BOTH END OF THE CROSSING. MODIFY THE DETECTABLE WARNING AT THE WEST END FOR ACCESS ONLY ACROSS THE PAAL, NOT TO THE ACCESSIBLE PARKING. I. PROVIDE ACCESSIBLE ROUTE CONNECTION FROM THE WESTERLY END OF THE MARKED CROSSING TO THE EXISTING CONCRETE ACCESSIBLE ROUTE AT THE SIDE OF THE ACCESSIBLE PARKING AISLE ON THE NORTH EAST END OF THE PARKING LOT. REFERENCE ZONING COMMENTS FOR CONCRETE WALK REQUIREMENTS. J. AT ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE EAST OF BUILDING "G", ALL SLOPES IN THIS AREA TO BE NO MORE THAN 2% BOTH WAYS. SHOW SIDE WALK RAMPS AS DETAILED BY DETAIL 3. K. AT WEST SIDE OF BUILDING "I", EXTEND ACCESSIBLE ROUTE SOUTH TO END OF PARKING SPACES. REFERENCE ZONING COMMENTS ABOUT CONCRETE WALK FINISHES. L. SEVERAL SECTIONS OF ACCESSIBLE ROUTE WALKWAYS EXCEED THE MAXIMUM SLOPE REQUIREMENTS AND MUST COMPLY WITH RAMP REQUIREMENTS AS PER 2006 IBC/ICC 117.1, SECTION 405, INCLUDING ALL LANDINGS , SLOPES AND GRAB BARS: 1. A SECTION OF ACCESSIBLE ROUTE WEST OF BUILDING "G" 2. A SECTION OF ACCESSIBLE ROUTE ON EITHER SIDE OF STAIR LOCATED AT THE SOUTH END BETWEEN BUILDINGS "E" AND "F" 3. A SECTION OF ACCESSIBLE ROUTE ON EITHER SIDE OF STAIR LOCATED AT THE NORTH END BETWEEN BUILDINGS "E" AND "F" M. PROVIDE SIDEWALK RAMP DETAIL FOR RAMP AT MOST SOUTHERLY END OF THE MOST WESTERLY MARKED CROSSING. N. PLEASE PROVIDE 2006 IBC/ICC 117.1 DETAILS THAT ALLOW PARALLEL ACCESSIBLE PARKING WITH DIMENSIONS, SIZES, AND ALL DETAILS. IF THERE ARE NONE PLEASE REVISE THE TWO ACCESSIBLE PARALLEL PARKING LAYOUT TO THAT AS OUTLINE IN THE CODE. O. EXTEND ACCESSIBLE ROUTE IN FRONT (AND THE SOUTH SIDE) OF BUILDING "F" AND THEN NORTH ALONG THE WEST SIDE OF THE SAME BUILDING TO THE END OF THE PARKING STALLS. REFERENCE ZONING COMMENTS CONCERNING CONCRETE FINISHES OF ROUTE. END OF COMMENTS |
| 09/11/2008 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | DSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: VIDAS SERENAS APARTMENTS Residential Care Services: Rehabilitation Service or Shelter Care T08CM03039 Site Plan (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: September 10, 2008 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. This site plan was reviewed for compliance with the City of Tucson Development Standards (D.S.) and Land Use Code (LUC) for full code compliance. 2. Based on the "EXISTING AND PROPOSED USE; RESIDENTIAL CARE SERVICE:" shown in the "LAND USE REQUIREMENTS - CITY OF TUCSON" block, provide a copy of the approved site plan that approved the apartment complex as Residential Care Services: Rehabilitation Service or Shelter Care. As the site plan approving the Residential Care Services: Rehabilitation Service or Shelter Care and an expansion calculation was not provided zoning's review is for full code compliance based on a change of use. 3. Based on LUC Subject to section 3.5.7.8.A, F & H the following applies: 3.5.7.8.A Rehabilitation Service or Shelter Care use shall not be located within twelve hundred (1,200) feet, in any direction, from another Rehabilitation Service or Shelter Care use. The applicant for such use must provide an inventory of such uses within twelve hundred (1,200) feet of the site prior to the establishment of the use. 3.5.7.8.F. The site is located at least five hundred (500) feet, measured in a straight line, from the property line to a zone boundary line of R-3 or more restrictive zoning. It appears that this project is located within five hundred (500) feet of an R-2 zone to the east and an R-3 zone to the west. A special exception may be required, see LUC Section 2.4.3.3.B. 4. D.S.2-02.2.1.A.6 Show existing/proposed canopies or balconies on the plan. Provide overall building dimensions on the plan. 5. D.S.2-02.2.1.A.7 As Stone Avenue is an arterial street shown on the MS&R map provide a setback dimension from the future curb to the buildings along Stone Avenue. 6. D.S.2-02.2.1.A.7 Dimension all distances between buildings on the plan. 7. D.S.2-02.2.1.A.9 Per D.S. 2-09.5.2 Show the required five (5) foot access aisle on the detail. 8. D.S.2-02.2.1.A.9 On the off-street bicycle parking detail, include the materials for lighting, i.e. building lighting or site lighting and the number of bicycles it supports. 9. D.S.2-02.2.1.A.10 As Stone Avenue does not appear to be at future width provide the future sight visibility triangles (SVTs) on the plan. 10. D.S.2-02.2.1.A.12 The parking area access lane (PAAL) located east of the parking along the east side of Building G does not appear to meet the twenty-four (24) foot width for a two-way PAAL. Provide a dimension from the parking space to the proposed refuse container location. 11. D.S.2-02.2.1.A.12 The PAAL located southwest of Building F does not meet the minimum twenty-four (24) foot width for a two-way PAAL. 12. D.S.2-02.2.1.A.12 Per D.S 2-08.4.1.B A sidewalk will be provided adjacent and parallel to any PAAL on the side where buildings are located and D.S. 3-05.2.2.B.1 A minimum setback distance of five (5) feet for a pedestrian refuge area must be maintained between any enclosed structure and a PAAL. This said: a. Provide a five (5) foot pedestrian refuge with a minimum four (4) foot sidewalk between the east side of Building A and the proposed building and the PAAL. b. Provide a five (5) foot pedestrian refuge with a minimum four (4) foot sidewalk between the north side of Building G and the PAAL. c. Provide a five (5) foot pedestrian refuge with a minimum four (4) foot sidewalk between the south side of Building F and the PAAL. 13. D.S.2-02.2.1.A.12 Per D.S 2-08.4.1.C A sidewalk will be provided adjacent to any parking space accessed by a PAAL where the space is located on the same side of the PAAL as any building and no other parking spaces or PAALs intervene. This said: a. Provide minimum four (4) foot sidewalk between the west side of Building F and the vehicle parking spaces. b. Provide minimum four (4) foot sidewalk between the west side of Building I and the vehicle parking spaces. 14. D.S.2-02.2.1.A.12 The proposed new gate, called out under keynote 24. located at the east end of Florence Street is required to be twenty-four (24) feet wide if it will be used for two way traffic. 15. D.S.2-02.2.1.A.12 Clarify how the two (2) parallel handicapped vehicle parking spaces will gain access to the pedestrian circulation/accessible route.D.S.2-02.2.1.A.12 Per D.S. 2-08.3.1 a continuous pedestrian. 16. D.S.2-02.2.1.A.12 A continuous pedestrian circulation/accessible route is required. This path must connect all public access areas of the development and the pedestrian circulation path located in any adjacent streets. The areas within the development which must be connected include, but are not limited to, all buildings, all bicycle and vehicle parking areas, all recreation areas, all dumpster areas, and all other common use areas. This said, show the continuous pedestrian circulation/accessible route that connects Building J to the other buildings. 17. D.S.2-02.2.1.A.12 The striped area running from the proposed handicapped vehicle parking space access aisle, located east of Building J, to the proposed sidewalk, located east of the proposed building, is required to be a sidewalk physically separated from any vehicular travel lane by means of curbing, grade separation, barriers, railings, or other means. 18. D.S.2-02.2.1.A.13 If applicable show the location, type, size and height of existing and proposed free standing signage or billboards on the site. 19. D.S.2-02.2.1.A.14 Show the two (2) required fully-dimensioned loading spaces with the maneuvering areas on the plan. 20. D.S.2-02.2.1.A.18 Label both Stone Avenue as MS&R. 21. D.S.2-02.2.1.A.19 Show the future right-of-way (ROW) dimensions on the plan. 22. D.S.2-02.2.1.A.21 Show the future curb location for Stone Avenue and a dimension from the street monument line on the plan. 23. D.S.2-02.2.1.A.25 If applicable show the proposed site lighting layout on the plan. 24. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.31 Show the proposed use as "GENERAL MERCHANCISE SALES "28", SUBJECT TO: SEC. 3.5.9.2.C."and GENERAL MERCHANDISE SALES "34", SUBJECT TO: SEC 3.5.9.2.A". 25. Per D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.3 Provide and overall all site lot coverage calculation on the plan. 26. Per D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.4 It appears that the vehicle parking space calculation in not correct. Zoning was only able to locate forty-four (44) spaces on site, not forty-seven (47) as called out in the calculation, please clarify. 27. Per D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.5 The loading space calculation is not correct. Per LUC Section 3.4.5.4 two (2) 12 x 35 loading spaces are required. 28. Per D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.6 Provide a building expansion calculation on the plan. 29. Additional comments may be forth coming depending on how each comment has been addressed. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956. C:\planning\site\t08cm03039. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised site plan and additional requested documents. |
| 09/19/2008 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. A street landscape border, per Sec. 3.7.2.4 of the LUC, is a landscape area with a minimum width of ten (10) feet, running the full length of the street property line(s) bounding the site except for points of ingress-egress. On streets designated as Major Streets and Routes (MS&R), the street landscape border is measured from the MS&R right-of-way line as determined by LUC 2.8.3.4. The street landscape border scales to less than 10 feet wide. Indicate the location of the Stone Avenue MS&R future right-of-way on the site plan drawing. 2. One (1) canopy tree must be provided for every thirty-three (33) linear feet of landscape border or fraction thereof per LUC 3.7.2.4. Revise street landscape border to indicate that with a length of 70 feet a total of 3 canopy trees are required. 3. It is unclear why a shrub (gopher plant), proposed to be planted from a 1 gallon container, is shown to be larger in the legend and on the map than the proposed canopy trees. The symbols used should indicate the approximate ultimate size/spread of plants on the plan per DS 2-07.2.2.A.c. Also the same symbol used for the gopher plant is used for existing canopy trees. Revise plan to show separate symbols for each type of plant existing and proposed to avoid confusion. Indicate the type(s), by both common and proper names, of the canopy trees existing within the street landscape border along Stone Avenue. Some of the tree symbols used on the drawing are not shown in the legend. Revise plan to indicate all plants, both existing and proposed. 4. Show future and existing sight visibility triangles clearly and correctly on the landscape and site plans. Some of the shrubs proposed, such as Texas ranger, myrtle, and red yucca may not be appropriate within SVT's as they grow higher than 30 inches. DS 2-06.3.8.G 5. Show all parking spaces clearly and completely on the landscape plan. Some of the spaces do not have the striping lines depicted on the landscape plan. Revise. 6. Dimension the minimum width and label the square footage measured from the inside of all tree planters in the vehicle use area. An unpaved area, which is a minimum of thirty-four (34) square feet in area and four (4) feet in width, must be provided for each canopy tree. LUC 3.7.2.3.A.1.c, DS 2-07.2.2.A.2.e 7. As part of Iandscape notes, include a statement that d.g. shall also be used within the right-of-way area between the curb and propoerty line. LUC 3.7.2.4.A.4 8. The landscape plan shall indicate use of all runoff, from individual catch basins around single trees to basins accepting flow from an entire vehicular use area or roof area. LUC 3.7.4.3.B |
| 09/23/2008 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Submit Application for Exception; include acceptable documentation, which clearly indicates that the project will not impact Protected Native Plants. Such documentation includes photographs of the site taken from all sides of the property. Photographs of the site are necessary for NPPO approval per DS 2-15.2.0.C |
| 10/03/2008 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | Indicate which buildings will require the installation of a backwater valve. (Where the finish floor elevation is less than 12 inches above the elevation of the next upstream manhole in the public sewer or private sewer collection system, a backwater valve shall be installed in the building drain or branch of the building drain serving that floor. Floors discharging from above that reference point shall not discharge through the backwater valve.) Reference: Section 710.1, UPC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson. |
| 10/08/2008 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | To: DOWL Engineers DATE: October 8, 2008 166 W. Alamenda Tucson, Arizona 85701 SUBJECT: Vida Serenas Apts., 2835 N. Stone Ave. Site plan T08CM03039 (First Review) T13S, R13E, Section 36 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Site Plan and Drainage Report. The Site Plan (SP) and Drainage Report (DR) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Site Plan: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the SP. 2. The site plan was reviewed for full code compliance. See City of Tucson Zoning for full code compliance designation. 3. As per the Federal ADA requirements, all wheel chair ramps shall have the truncated domes instead of the standard grooves that are shown on COT SD 207. Aside from the Truncated Domes, all wheel chair ramps shall be constructed in accordance with COT SD 207. 4. It is difficult to distinguish what is existing or proposed on the drawing. Perhaps darkening the lines of the new buildings may work. Revise as required. 5. Provide all existing and proposed buildings and structures, including location, size, height, overhangs, canopies, and use per D.S. 2-02.2.1.6. See comment no. 3. 6. Label existing and future sight visibility triangles per D.S. 2-02.2.1.10. Vehicle parking in the future sight visibility is not allowed. Revise as required. 7. Show all points of egress and ingress including locations and width of driveways and parking area access lanes (P.A.A.L.) per D.S. 2-02.2.1.11. Minimum width for a two-way PAAL is 24'. Dimension all width of the access lanes. 8. Please label all vehicular, bicycle, pedestrian, and handicapped circulation clearly identified per D.S. 2-02.2.1.12. Provide a painted sidewalk to the refuse enclosures from a proposed or existing sidewalk. 9. Fully dimensioned loading space(s) and maneuvering area(s) per D.S. 2-02.2.1.14. The refuse service vehicle can only reverse in a straight line 40 feet. A three point vehicle turns will not be allowed. 10. Dimensions on the plan view for the parking areas do not match the dimensions shown on the cross-sections on page C1.3. 11. Please show dimensioned right-of-way, including any applicable Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Plan right-of-way per D.S. 2-02.2.1.19. 12. Curb returns are required at the ingress/egress for all developments along a Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Plan. The minimum Radius for the curb returns are 18'. 13. 5-year threshold retention is a requirement for projects larger than 1 acre. 14. Add the basin(s) maintenance responsibility note per S.M.D.D.F.M. 2.3.1.6 C 1 and 2 to the SP. 15. Sidewalks, curbs and wheelchair ramps are required where applicable per D.S. 3-01.3.0 and installed with "Detectable Warnings" per ADAAG. 16. Dimension from street monument lines to existing and proposed curbs, sidewalks, driveways, and utility lines per D.S. 2-02.2.1.21. 17. Show Site plan number (T0803039) on all sheets per D.S. 2-02.2.1.29. 18. A permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information. 19. Please show a typical cross section of the P.A.A.L. or call out the percentage of slopes. Call out the GB at the D/W, if applicable. 20. Please show the proposed roof drainage patterns, 100% of the 10-year flow must be conveyed under the sidewalks including any other site drainage as well. Please provide supporting calculations to demonstrate compliance with D.S. 3-01.4.4. If the location(s) of the roof scuppers have not yet been decided, a general note indicating sidewalk scuppers will be used when the roof scuppers locations have been designed and located will suffice. 21. Add note: "Depress all landscaped areas 6" maximum for water harvesting". 22. "A grading permit and Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP's) will be required for this project. Submit 2 sets of grading and SWPPP with text, upon completion and submittal of a grading permit application. A grading permit may not be issued prior to site plan approval. Subsequent comments may be necessary, depending upon the nature and extent of revisions that occur to the plans". Drainage Report: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DR. 2. 5-year threshold retention is a requirement for projects larger than 1 acre. 3. A Drainage report is required for any site greater than one acre in size or for any site subject to detention requirements…..per S.M.D.D.F.M., chap. II, 2.1.2. 4. The content and format of the Drainage Report should follow S.M.D.D.F.M., chap. II, 2.2. 5. Show the project address or administration address on the cover sheet of the DR. 6. If applicable, add the basin(s) maintenance responsibility note and checklist per S.M.D.D.F.M. 2.3.1.6 C 1 and 2 to the DR. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 837-4932 or Paul.Machado@tucsonaz.gov Paul P. Machado Senior Engineering Associate City of Tucson/Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 837-4932 office (520) 879-8010 fax C:/2835 N. Stone Ave_Site |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12/10/2008 | CINDY AGUILAR | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 12/10/2008 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |