Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL NEW
Permit Number - T08CM02990
Review Name: COMMERCIAL NEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/05/2008 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Denied | Please include the following design criteria to the plans. 1. Flow data (static pressure, residual pressure, GPM) Available from the Fire Department (520) 791-3234 2. The standard to be used in development of sprinkler system. (NFPA 13, NFPA 13R, or NFPA 13D) 3. The hazard classification of the building, including any special hazards. 4. The density required of the water supply. Also, please include code anaylsis. |
| 09/05/2008 | SREEVES1 | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 09/05/2008 | JOHN WILLIAMS | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Passed | |
| 09/10/2008 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. 1/8" LETTERING IS REQUIRED ON ALL DRAWINGS UNLESS A WRITTEN APPEAL FOR 3/32" LETTERING IS APPROVED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL, JESSIE SANDERS. THIS APPROVED APPEAL MUST ACCOMPANY DRAWINGS SUBMITTED FOR CHECKING. 2. SHEET A2.0; FLOOR PLAN: REMOVE NOTES EAST OF GRID LINE O INDICATING NEW/EXISTING BUILDING. VERIFY. 3. SHEET A2.0; FLOOR PLAN: NOTE ABOVE PLAN AT GRID 1 INDICATING NEW/EXISTING BUILDING IS REVERSED. VERIFY. 4. SHEET A3.0 SOUTH ELEVATION; SHEET A7.2 SECTION 3: ELEVATION INDICATES TOP OF MASONRY IS 26'-0", WHILE SECTION INDICATES 28'-0". CLARIFY. 5. SHEET A3.1 NORTH ELEVATION; SHEET A7.0 SECTION 1: ELEVATION INDICATES TOP OF MASONRY IS 16'-0", WHILE SECTION INDICATES "TO BE VERIFIED". CLARIFY. 6. SHEET A4.0 SECTION 1; SHEET A7.4 SECTION 3: TOP OF PARAPET CONFIGURATION AND ELEVATION VARY IN THESE TWO SECTIONS. CLARIFY. 7. CALCULATIONS SHEET 14; SECTION 2/S5.1: LEDGER CONNECTION TO MASONRY DIFFERS BETWEEN CALCULATION AND SECTION. CLARIFY. 8. GET SHEET S5.1 INSERTED INTO THE SET. 9. CALCULATIONS SHEET 25; SECTION 5/S5.2: CALCULATION FOR ML3 (WHICH IS ML2 ON PLAN) CALLS FOR 2-#5 TOP AND BOTTOM, WHILE SECTION INDICATES 2-#4 TOP. CLARIFY. 10. CALCULATIONS SHEET 32: IS DEFLECTION OF 3.226" (L/204) ACCEPTABLE? 11. CALCULATIONS SHEET 44-61 (MW1-MW7); GENERAL NOTES ON S0.1: THE VERTICAL REINFORCING IN MASONRY WALL CALCULATIONS DIFFERS FROM THE MASONRY GENERAL NOTE. CLARIFY. 12. CALCULATIONS SHEET 64a-64f; SHEET S1.1: JAMB PIERS AND THEIR FOOTINGS (P2/P3) IN THE CALCULATIONS DO NOT MATCH THE FOUNDATION PLAN. CLARIFY. 13. SHEET S2.1: SECTION CUT ON THE NORTH WALL NEAR GRID LINE 5 NEEDS TO BE COMPLETED. 14. SHEET S2.1; ROOF FRAMING PLAN: SECTION CUT 9/S5.1 AT GRIDS B AND 5 IS 'SIMILAR' CONDITION (GIRDER ON ONE SIDE PER 10/S5.1). VERIFY. 15. SECTIONS 2&3/S4.2: BOXED NOTE REFERRING TO SECTION NEEDS TO BE COMPLETED. 16. SHEET S4.2; SECTION 4: MOVE P.E. STAMP SO SECTION INFORMATION IS NOT OBSCURED. 17. SHEET S5.1; SECTION 11: SEAT FOR GIRDER TRUSS REQUIRES PLATE DIMENSIONS/THICKNESSES/WELDS. 18. SHEET S5.2; SECTION 2: PROVIDE MISSING INFORMATION IN NOTE AT JOIST STIFFENER. |
| 09/11/2008 | ERIC NEWCOMB | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 09/12/2008 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | DSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: 3372 S 6th Ave T08CM02990 Building Plan (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: September 12, 2008 1. The building plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning could not verify that the building plan was in compliance with the approved revised development plan. Please submit two copies of the approved and stamped development, landscape, and NPPO plans with the next building plan submittal. 3. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved and stamped development plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956 C:\planning\grading\t08cm02990.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised site plan and additional requested documents |
| 09/12/2008 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | The revision to the development plan must be approved before the building plan is approved. |
| 09/16/2008 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Provide a design for the underslab plumbing. 2. Provide roof drainage calculations and the sizes of the roof drains and rain leaders. 3. Revise the design of the overflow drain to comply with the requirements of Section 1105.2, UPC 2006. |
| 09/16/2008 | RAY MAJUTA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 09/16/2008 | CAGUILA1 | WWM | REVIEW | Needs Review | |
| 09/16/2008 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | Provide energy calculations for the building envelope. |
| 09/16/2008 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Denied | Provide location and sizes for the water meter and backflow preventer serving this building. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 09/16/2008 | CINDY AGUILAR | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |