Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

PRO is currently experiencing an outage. Some documents and records may not be available on PRO momentarily. We apologize for the inconvenience and are working to restore full access.

Permit Number: T08CM02989
Parcel: 12510069A

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: RESUBMITTAL

Permit Number - T08CM02989
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
09/11/2008 RONALD BROWN BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Approved
09/11/2008 RONALD BROWN ZONING HC SITE REVIEW Approved
09/12/2008 JOHN WILLIAMS COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING Passed
09/26/2008 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Provide accessible showers per Section 608, ICC/ANSI A117.1-2003. Reference: Section 1109.2, IBC 2006.
2. Provide a detail of the water heater installation, including the excess pressure relief, expansion tank, recirculating pump and valves. Clarify how the hot water recirculation system will work as currently shown. Reference: Sections 103.2.3, 605.5, 608.3, and 608.7 UPC 2006.
3. Provide a vacuum relief for storage-type water heaters located above any fixture outlets. Reference: Section 608.7, UPC 2006.
4. The fixture connection sizes called out for the flush valves (water closets and urinals) will result in water velocities greater than 8 FPS. Limit the water velocity to less than 8 FPS for the copper piping. Reference: Section A 6.1, UPC 2006 and IS 3-2003, Section 2.6.
10/02/2008 GERRY KOZIOL WWM REVIEW Denied 1. CONQUISTADOR EXECUTIVE OFFICES
2. BASEMENT & 1ST FLOOR - RECOUNTED ALL WASTEWATER PLUMBING FIXTURES - NEED 5TH FLOOR CREDIT EVALUATION
10/03/2008 RAY MAJUTA ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied Project;T08CM02989
3773 E Broadway
TI Office

The Electrical plans have been denied for the following,

1.Sheet E-5, key note 5, the conductors run from the 400 A switch at the SES to the the wire way show 350 MCM conductors proceted at 400 A , should be 350 A per NEC 310-16. Please verify.
2. Sheet E-5, shows only one conduit run from wireway to disconnects B and C, will the same conduit also carry the load back to the wireway thur thru to the panel? If so a reduction in ampacity would be required,please verify.
3. Sheet E-5, the fault current for panels B and C are above 10 KAIC,please indicate on panels.


Ray T Majuta
DSD Electrical Plan Check
CIty of Tucson
250-837/4988
10/03/08
10/03/08