Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - T08CM02989
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/11/2008 | RONALD BROWN | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 09/11/2008 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 09/12/2008 | JOHN WILLIAMS | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Passed | |
| 09/26/2008 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Provide accessible showers per Section 608, ICC/ANSI A117.1-2003. Reference: Section 1109.2, IBC 2006. 2. Provide a detail of the water heater installation, including the excess pressure relief, expansion tank, recirculating pump and valves. Clarify how the hot water recirculation system will work as currently shown. Reference: Sections 103.2.3, 605.5, 608.3, and 608.7 UPC 2006. 3. Provide a vacuum relief for storage-type water heaters located above any fixture outlets. Reference: Section 608.7, UPC 2006. 4. The fixture connection sizes called out for the flush valves (water closets and urinals) will result in water velocities greater than 8 FPS. Limit the water velocity to less than 8 FPS for the copper piping. Reference: Section A 6.1, UPC 2006 and IS 3-2003, Section 2.6. |
| 10/02/2008 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Denied | 1. CONQUISTADOR EXECUTIVE OFFICES 2. BASEMENT & 1ST FLOOR - RECOUNTED ALL WASTEWATER PLUMBING FIXTURES - NEED 5TH FLOOR CREDIT EVALUATION |
| 10/03/2008 | RAY MAJUTA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | Project;T08CM02989 3773 E Broadway TI Office The Electrical plans have been denied for the following, 1.Sheet E-5, key note 5, the conductors run from the 400 A switch at the SES to the the wire way show 350 MCM conductors proceted at 400 A , should be 350 A per NEC 310-16. Please verify. 2. Sheet E-5, shows only one conduit run from wireway to disconnects B and C, will the same conduit also carry the load back to the wireway thur thru to the panel? If so a reduction in ampacity would be required,please verify. 3. Sheet E-5, the fault current for panels B and C are above 10 KAIC,please indicate on panels. Ray T Majuta DSD Electrical Plan Check CIty of Tucson 250-837/4988 10/03/08 10/03/08 |