Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Active
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - T08CM02920
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Active
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/07/2008 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Denied | Please include the following design criteria to the plans. 1. The standard to be used in development of sprinkler system. (NFPA 13, NFPA 13R, or NFPA 13D) 2. The hazard classification of the building, including any special hazards. 3. The density required of the water supply. For this information to not be required on these plans, the fire protection drawings would have to be "sealed." In discussions with Foothills Fire Protection, they do not intend to seal their drawings. Therefore, this information is required on these plans. |
| 10/09/2008 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 10/15/2008 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Denied | NEED TO PERMIT ON-SITE PRIVATE SEWER- NEED DEQ REVIEW & APPROVAL TO CONSTRUCT ON-SITE PRIVATE SEWER- MIKE REDMOND 740-3340- NEED COPY OF PRIVATE SEWER FOR BASE MAP UPDATE NEED PCRWRD REVIEW & APPROVAL TO TAP MANHOLE FOR PRIVATE SEWER- ROY MONTOYA-740-6480- (1801 W VALENCIA RD IS ADMIN ADDRESS) BUILDING PLUMBING FLOOR PLAN DOES NOT MATCH ON-SITE PRIVATE SEWER PLAN PER S08-043 |
| 10/20/2008 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | DSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: New Day Care at Shops at Midvale Park T08CM02920 Building Plan (2nd Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: October 20, 2008 1. The building plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning could not verify that the building plan was in compliance with the stamped approved tentative plat/development plan. Please submit two copies of the stamped approved tentative plat/development plan, landscape, and NPPO plans with the next building plan submittal. Zoning may not be able to approve the building plan until the final plat has been approved. 3. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved and stamped site plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956 C:\planning\grading\t08cm02920 RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised site plan and additional requested documents |
| 10/21/2008 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. The size calculation for the thermal expansion tank for water heaters WH-1 and WH-2 uses a final temperature of 110 degrees Fahrenheit and a relief valve setting of 80 PSI. Detail 16/P-3 shows an operating temperature of 140 degrees Fahrenheit and does not indicate the presence of a secondary relief valve set for 80 PSI. (The standard T&P valve supplied with the water heater is set for 212 degrees Fahrenheit and 150 PSI.) Coordinate the drawings and the calculations. Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006. 2. Cleanouts shall be sized per Table 7-6, UPC 2006. Each change in pipe size for which the required cleanout size is different must be provided with a cleanout of the proper size. (e.g. see the drain pipe running under room 140; the cleanout for the drinking fountain is for a 3" pipe but there is no cleanout provided where the pipe transitions to a 4" pipe) Reference: Section 707.11, UPC 2006. |
| 10/21/2008 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Denied | The submitted civil plans show a 1" water service to the building and no reduced pressure backflow preventer assembly; sheet P-1 indicates a 2-1/2" water service and a 2" water meter (by the civil) and allows the option of a double check valve assembly in lieu of the required reduced pressure backflow preventer assembly. (The water calculations also utilize the pressure drop of a double check valve assembly and not a reduced pressure backflow preventer assembly. Provide a site drawing showing the size and route of the building water supply along with the location and size of both the water meter and the required reduced pressure backflow preventer assembly. Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006. |
| 10/22/2008 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: October 22, 2008 SUBJECT: 1801 W Valencia Road Building Plan- 2nd Engineering Review TO: WLB Group LOCATION: T15S R13E Sec15 Ward 1 REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM ACTIVITY: T08CM02920 (Building Plan) SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Development Services Department has received the building plan (T08CM02920) for the above referenced property. Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the building plan application at this time. The following items need to be addressed: BUILDING PLAN COMMENTS: 1) Engineering could not verify that the building plan was in compliance with the stamped approved tentative plat/development plan. Please submit two copies of the stamped approved tentative plat/development plan, landscape, and NPPO plans with the next building plan submittal. Engineering may not be able to approve the building plan until the final plat has been approved. 2) Engineering will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved and stamped tentative plat/development plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming. GENERAL COMMENTS: Please provide a revised building plan that addresses the comments provided above. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments. Further comments may be generated upon re-submittal of the building plan review. If you have any questions or to schedule an appointment I can be reached at 837-4929. Jason Green, CFM Senior Engineer Associate Engineering Division COT Development Services |
| 10/23/2008 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | Justify the ventilation calculations for RTU-20 that refer to the Aquarium Room (111) as "storage". Reference: Section 403.3, IMC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson. |
| 10/24/2008 | RAY MAJUTA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/28/2008 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | RECEIVED |