Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - SITE ALL
Permit Number - T08CM02919
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - SITE ALL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/15/2008 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 10/16/2008 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | MOVE THE DETECTABLE WARNING PAD OUT OF THE PAAL AND ONTO THE LANDING OF THE ENTRANCE DOOR TO THE KIOSK. |
| 10/17/2008 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | DSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Fry's Fuel Center - 555 E. Grant Road T08CM02919 Site Plan (2nd Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: October 17, 2008 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. This site plan was reviewed for compliance with the City of Tucson Development Standards (D.S.) and Land Use Code (LUC) for full code compliance for the fuel center only. 2. Provide a copy of the approved site/development plan drawings that includes the last approved parking calculation. 3. This comment has not been addressed correctly. The existing SVT for the near side of the entrance off of Grant Road and the far side for 1st Avenue are not shown correctly. This SVT should line up with the proposed widening of the entrance. Verify all SVT issues with your Engineering reviewer. D.S.2-02.2.1.A.10 The sight visibility triangles (SVT's) shown on the plan are not shown correctly, see engineering comments. Also if applicable show future SVT's on the plan. Both Grant Road and 1st Avenue are arterial streets and there may also be intersection widening required, see engineering comments. 4. Zoning acknowledges that a Development Standards Modification Request (DSMR) will be applied for. Once/if approved provide on the plan, the DSMR number, date of approval, what was modified and any conditions. D.S.2-02.2.1.A.12 Per D.S. 2-08.3.1 Within all development, a continuous pedestrian circulation/accessible route path is required. This path must connect all public access areas of the development and the pedestrian circulation path located in any adjacent streets. The areas within the development which must be connected include, but are not limited to, all buildings, all bicycle and vehicle parking areas, all recreation areas, all dumpster areas, and all other common use areas. This said, show the required pedestrian circulation/accessible route to Grant Road and to the existing shopping center. 5. This comment was not addressed, see additional comments below. Per D.S. 2-02.2.2.B When the proposed site is part of a larger site, the calculations encompass the entire site, whether existing or proposed. This said all calculations required under D.S. 2-02.2.2.A are required for the entire site. Once the calculations are revised to include the entire site Zoning will be able to review the calculations. a. D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.3 Based on development designators "28" & "34" lot coverage is not applicable. Remove all references to "LOT COVERAGE" from the plan. Provide a floor area ratio (FAR) calculation based on LUC 3.2.11 and an allowed FAR of 0.35. b. D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.4 The provided vehicle parking calculation is not correct. The area called out as "#6 3,111 SQ SF (EXISTING) (E) RESTAURANT 505 E. GRANT RD" is not part of this site, remove the square footage from the parking calculation. "BUILDING 4" does not exist as for this calculation, remove the square footage from the parking calculation. Add the square footage for the kiosk to the parking calculation. Zoning came up with a total square footage, once the above corrections are made, of 101,613/200 = 508 vehicle parking spaces required. Based on my research the last approved site plan shows 538 vehicle parking spaces provided. After deleting 31 for this project I come up with 507 provided on site. This said the project is 1 vehicle space short of the required, therefore a Board of Adjustment for Variance is required. c. D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.6 Provide a building expansion/reduction calculation. Zoning acknowledges that there will be a reduction in building area. 6. Additional comments may be forth coming depending on how each comment has been addressed. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956. C:\planning\site\t08cm02919-2nd. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised site plan and additional requested documents. |
| 10/28/2008 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Submit a landscape plan to verify that the entire fuel center meets minimum requirements of DS 2-07 & LUC 3.7 2. A street landscape border, per Sec. 3.7.2.4 of the LUC, is a landscape area with a minimum width of ten (10) feet, running the full length of the street property line(s) bounding the site except for points of ingress-egress. On streets designated as Major Streets and Routes (MS&R), the street landscape border is measured from the MS&R right-of-way line as determined by LUC 2.8.3.4. 3. Street landscape borders shall be located entirely on site, except that, if approved by the City Engineer or designee, up to five (5) feet of the required ten (10) foot width be placed within the adjacent right-of-way. If necessary obtain permission for use of the ROW. 4. Non-required landscaping may be placed in the public right-of-way, if the landscaping is approved by the City Engineer or designee and complies with the City Engineer's requirements on construction, irrigation, location, and plant type. 5. Fifty (50) percent or more of the street landscape border area must have shrubs and vegetative ground cover per LUC 3.7.2.4 6. Indicate square footage of all landscaped areas and calculation of the percentage of vegetative coverage per DS 2-07.2.2.2.g. 7. One (1) canopy tree must be provided for every thirty-three (33) linear feet of landscape border per LUC 3.7.2.4. 8. A 30" continuous screen along street frontages for vehicle use area must be provided per LUC Table 3.7.2-I 9. Any screen or vegetation higher than thirty (30) inches must be located outside of the sight visibility triangle. 10. The planting plan and layout calculations will include location, size, and name of existing vegetation to remain in place and material and areas of inert ground cover. 11. All landscape areas will be depressed to accept water flow from roofs, PAAL, and parking areas. Show by detail or spot elevations how landscape areas will accommodate water harvesting. 12. Include with re-submittal DSMR approval documentation. Indicate on the lower right hand corner of the site plan, the case number, date of approval, and any conditions imposed. 13. The site plan and landscape plan must show identical site layout to avoid conflict between the two plans. Ensure that all changes to the site plan are reflected on the landscape plan. 14. Additional comments may apply. |
| 10/29/2008 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 11/07/2008 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11/12/2008 | CPIERCE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 11/12/2008 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |