Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T08CM02805
Parcel: 12307229B

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: RESUBMITTAL

Permit Number - T08CM02805
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
11/12/2008 MARTIN BROWN FIRE REVIEW Approved
11/12/2008 TERRY STEVENS ZONING REVIEW Denied 11/12/2008

Development Services Department
Zoning Review Section

Terry Stevens
Lead Planner

Comments:

1. The building plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed.

2. Zoning could not verify that the building plan was in compliance with the approved development plan. Please submit two copies of the approved and stamped development, landscape, and NPPO plans with the next building plan submittal.

3. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved site/development plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming.
11/13/2008 ROBERT SHERRY WATER REVIEW Approved
11/14/2008 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Comment not addressed. Provide CW shut off valves for each building entrance. Reference: Section 605.2, UPC 2006.
2. Comment not resolved. The note "Based upon shell bldg engineer's calculations…" is not applicable since there are no shell building plans. Provide water pressure and water pipe sizing calculations. Reference: Section 610.1, UPC 2006.
3. Comment not addressed. Coordinate the water service piping for the irrigation system, for both size and layout, with the plumbing drawings.
4. Comment not addressed. Provide roof drainage calculations and clarify the roof design. Reference: Section 1106.0, UPC 2006.
11/14/2008 ROBERT SHERRY MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Comment not resolved. Provide sufficient detail on the drawings to evaluate the energy compliance of the building envelope. The information shall, as a minimum, include U-factors of the envelope systems and fenestration components (Do the windows really have a U-value of 4? What is the U-value and the SHGC for the glass block?), along with the R-values of the insulation. Note that the provided calculations are for Pima, Arizona, which is a small town northwest of Safford, Arizona. Use "Pima County < 4,000 feet". Reference: Section 101.4, International Energy Conservation Code 2006.
2. Show how the fan coils (FC-2, FC-3, and FC-4) are being connected to the building structure and provide calculations to show that the building structure is not being adversely affected. Reference: Section 302.1, IMC 2006.
3. Provide mounting details and calculations to show that the building structure is not being adversely affected by the installation of the condensing units; CU-1, CU-2, CU-3, and CU-4. Reference: Section 302.1, IMC 2006.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
11/25/2008 CINDY AGUILAR OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
11/25/2008 SUE REEVES REJECT SHELF Completed