Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T08CM02804
Parcel: 12307229B

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: RESUBMITTAL

Permit Number - T08CM02804
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
11/12/2008 MARTIN BROWN FIRE REVIEW Approved
11/12/2008 TERRY STEVENS ZONING REVIEW Denied 11/12/2008

Development Services Department
Zoning Review Section

Terry Stevens
Lead Planner

Comments:

1. The building plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed.

2. Zoning could not verify that the building plan was in compliance with the approved development plan. Please submit two copies of the approved and stamped development, landscape, and NPPO plans with the next building plan submittal.

3. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved site/development plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming.
11/13/2008 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Comment not resolved. Provide material standards for all plumbing fixtures being selected by the owner. Show the information on the drawings; in lieu of material standards, manufacturer and model information is sufficient. Reference: Section 401.1, UPC 2006.
2. Comment not addressed. Provide CW shut off valves for each building entrance. Reference: Section 605.2, UPC 2006.
3. Comment not resolved. The note "Based upon shell bldg engineer's calculations…" is not applicable since there are no shell building plans. Provide water pressure and water pipe sizing calculations. Reference: Section 610.1, UPC 2006.
4. Include the four hose bibbs in the water demand calculations. Reference: Section 610.1, UPC 2006.
5. Comment not addressed. Coordinate the water service piping for the irrigation system, for both size and layout, with the plumbing drawings.
6. The floor-ceiling assembly between the first and second stories is fire-rated. Provide specifications and details to show how the fire-rating will be preserved at the combustible and non-combustible piping penetrations. Reference: Section 1502.0, UPC 2006.
7. Show how the use of an air admittance valve as a cleanout complies with Sections 707.1, 707.2, and 707.3, UPC 2006.
8. Show that detail 209 provides adequate access space per Section 707.10, UPC 2006.
9. The manufacturer's cut sheet for the tankless water heater indicates a maximum delivery of 5 GPM with a 65 degree Fahrenheit rise (40-105) but the hot water demand for the apartment is 9 GPM. Clarify how one unit can supply the demand for hot water. Reference: footnote 3, Table 6-5 and Chart A3, Appendix A, UPC 2006.
11/13/2008 ROBERT SHERRY WATER REVIEW Approved
11/14/2008 ROBERT SHERRY MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Comment not resolved. Provide sufficient detail on the drawings to evaluate the energy compliance of the building envelope. The information shall, as a minimum, include U-factors of the envelope systems and fenestration components (Do the windows really have a U-value of 4? What is the U-value and the SHGC for the glass block?), along with the R-values of the insulation. Note that the provided calculations are for Pima, Arizona, which is a small town northwest of Safford, Arizona. Use "Pima County < 4,000 feet". Reference: Section 101.4, International Energy Conservation Code 2006.
2. Clarify the nature of FC-1; does it have a horizontal discharge per the equipment schedule or does it have a vertical discharge as shown on the floor plan and detail 102/M-2. Reference: Section 304.1, IMC 2006.
3. Show how the plenum under FC-1 is to be constructed. Reference: Section 602.2, IMC 2006.
4. Clarify how the secondary condensate drain for FC-1 will be installed. Detail 102/M-2 shows a water level detection device per Section 307.2.3 (4) but detail 208/P2.1 shows a secondary condensate drain connecting to the primary condensate drain in violation of Section 307.2.3, IMC 2006.
5. Revise details 106 and 108 on sheet M-3 as required, showing how they are to be installed on the roof being provided by the architect: clay tile with a 12:5 slope. Reference: Sections 106.3.1 and 304.1, IMC 2006.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
11/25/2008 CINDY AGUILAR OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
11/25/2008 SUE REEVES REJECT SHELF Completed