Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - T08CM02778
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/03/2008 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 10/07/2008 | RONALD BROWN | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. OK 2. SHEET a0.20; OCCUPANCY ANALYSIS: IN WAITING AREA, WHAT FUNCTION DOES THE 15 SF/PERSON NUMBER COME FROM IN TABLE 1004.1.1? VERIFY. RESUBMITTAL COMMENTS: THE WAITING AREA OCCUPANT LOAD OF 1/15 FOR AIRPORT TERMINALS. THIS IS A "B" BUSINESS OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION: 1/100. RECALCULATE OCCUPANT USING 1/100. 3. SHEET a2.00: REVIEW IBC SECTION 1014 FOR EXIT ACCESS AND MEANS OF EGRESS THROUGH RESTRICTED SPACES/ROOMS. RESUBMITTAL COMMENTS: SECTION 1014.2.2/IBC 2006 RESTRICTS EGRESS THROUGH STORAGE ROOMS. RECONFIGURE EGRESS EXITS. 4. OK 5. PROVIDE COST BREAKDOWN OF PROJECT, INDICATING COST OF ACCESSIBILITY ISSUES (MAXIMUM 20% REQUIRED) PER IBC SECTION 3409.7. RESUBMITTAL: VALUATIONS DO NOT HAVE TO BE FINAL BID COSTS. THEY MAY BE BUDGETARY, GUSSESTIMATE AND/OR BALLPARK FIGURES. PLEASE PROVIDE COST BREAKDOWN AND SHOW APPROXIMATE ACCESSIBALE VALUE PERCENTAGE. 6. SHEET M2.01: ARE ALL AC AND CU UNITS ON ROOF NEW? IF SO, MUST PROVIDE STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS FOR NEW LOADS ON EXISTING ROOF STRUCTURE. IF NOT, PROVIDE INFORMATION COMPARING NEW UNIT WEIGHTS WITH OLD UNITS. RESUBMITTAL COMMENTS: NO RESPONSE PROVIDED 7. SHEET M0.02; AIR HANDLER UNIT DETAIL: PROVIDE SPECIFIC DETAIL OF HOW NEW UNIT IS ATTACHED TO EXISTING STRUCTURE. RESUBMITTAL COMMENTS: NO RESPOSED PROVIDED NEW COMMENTS: 8. AT NURSES COUNTER (SPACE 120) PROVIDE AN ACCESSIBLE PORTION OF THE SERVICE COUNTER FOR COMPLIANCE WITH ANSI 117.1, SECTION 904.3.1 AND 904.3.2 |
| 10/07/2008 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Denied | SEE BUILD FOLDER FOR COMMENTS |
| 10/16/2008 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. The shell drawings supplied as reference and the revised plumbing drawings for this project do not indicate the installation of a new, independent water service for suite 101. Provide a reference drawing showing that a new, separate water service has been installed for this suite. Reference: Sections 103.2.3 and 610.1, UPC 2006. 2. The specified water heater (Ruud ES120) has a shell diameter of 30.25" and the distance from the front of the control panel to the opposite side of the water heater is 36". The water heater must pass through an opening only 2'-4" wide and operate in a space only 3'-2" x 4'-0". Considering the manufacturer requires a minimum of 18" clearance from the control panel to combustible construction with additional space allowed for inspection and servicing, the planned installation appears to be at odds with the manufacturer's requirements. Provide access and working space for the water heater. Reference: Section 505.3, UPC 2006. 3. Provide upper terminal cleanouts on horizontal drainage pipes exceeding 5 feet in length (horizontal drain lines serving sinks require cleanouts regardless of length). Reference: Section 707.4, UPC 2006. |
| 10/17/2008 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | DSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Davita Medical Offices T08CM02778 Building Plan (2nd Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: October 17, 2008 1. The building plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning acknowledges receipt of the approved Tentative Plat/Development Plan. 3. Provide a current rent roll for all tenants within Lot #4 so that compliance to the approved parking calculations can be verified. 4. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved and stamped site plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956 C:\planning\grading\t08cm02778.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised site plan and additional requested documents |
| 10/20/2008 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Revise the architectural detail 23/A9.10 to show that the connections to the wood I-joists are being made per the joist manufacturer's requirements. Reference: Section 302.1, IMC 2006. 2. Comment not resolved; see AC-1 and AC-3, AC-4 and AC-6. Combining two AC units of any size requires a minimum drain size of 1". Provide information to show how the condensate drains serving multiple fan coils have been sized. Reference: Section 307.2.2, IMC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson |
| 10/21/2008 | RAY MAJUTA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | Approved last comments issued by Linda Buzcinsky on9/10/08----per RTMajuta,10/21/08 |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/23/2008 | DELMA ROBEY | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 10/23/2008 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |