Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL TI
Permit Number - T08CM02778
Review Name: COMMERCIAL TI
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/15/2008 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | DSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: T08CM02778 Building Plan (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: August 15, 2008 1. The building plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Provide a copy of the approved development plan and revised parking calculations with the next submittal. 3. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved and stamped site plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956 C:\planning\grading\t08cm02778.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised site plan and additional requested documents |
| 08/15/2008 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Denied | Please indicate whether or not the building contains fire sprinklers. |
| 08/15/2008 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. 1/8" LETTERING ON ALL DRAWINGS REQUIRED UNLESS A WRITTEN APPEAL IS APPROVED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL, JESSIE SANDERS. THIS APPROVED APPEAL MUST ACCOMPANY DRAWINGS SUBMITTED FOR CHECKING. 2. SHEET a0.20; OCCUPANCY ANALYSIS: IN WAITING AREA, WHAT FUNCTION DOES THE 15 SF/PERSON NUMBER COME FROM IN TABLE 1004.1.1? VERIFY. 3. SHEET a2.00: REVIEW IBC SECTION 1014 FOR EXIT ACCESS AND MEANS OF EGRESS THROUGH RESTRICTED SPACES/ROOMS. 4. SHOW MEANS OF EGRESS PER IBC SECTION 106.1.2. 5. PROVIDE COST BREAKDOWN OF PROJECT, INDICATING COST OF ACCESSIBILITY ISSUES (MAXIMUM 20% REQUIRED) PER IBC SECTION 3409.7. 6. SHEET M2.01: ARE ALL AC AND CU UNITS ON ROOF NEW? IF SO, MUST PROVIDE STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS FOR NEW LOADS ON EXISTING ROOF STRUCTURE. IF NOT, PROVIDE INFORMATION COMPARING NEW UNIT WEIGHTS WITH OLD UNITS. 7. SHEET M0.02; AIR HANDLER UNIT DETAIL: PROVIDE SPECIFIC DETAIL OF HOW NEW UNIT IS ATTACHED TO EXISTING STRUCTURE. |
| 08/19/2008 | ERIC NEWCOMB | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. SEE BUILDING COMMENTS FOR ACCESSIBILITY ISSUES. |
| 08/22/2008 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Revise the font size used on the drawings to a minimum of 1/8-inch (all upper case). (A 3/32" font may be allowed with an appeal to the building official.) Reference: Section 106.1.1, IBC 2006. 2. Correct the room areas used for the outside air calculations and see Section 403.2.3, IMC 2006 for calculation of the common ventilation system requirements. 3. Revise the schedule for the fan coils to include their operating weight and the external static pressure at their operating point. Reference: Section 106.3.1, IMC 2006. 4. The shell drawings for this building used a maximum operating weight of 45 pounds for the fan coils serving the first floor of the building. The specified fan coils appear to have an operating weight closer to 120 pounds; provide structural calculations and architectural details showing how the fan coils are to be supported from the structure. Reference: Section 302.1, IMC 2006. 5. Assuming that the condensate drain pan shown in the "condensate piping at unit detail" is the internal drain pan for the unit, connected to the primary condensate drain, clarify how the "secondary discharge to drain pan" in the "air handler unit detail" complies with the requirements of Section 307.2.3 IMC 2006. 6. Provide information to show how the condensate drains serving multiple fan coils have been sized. Reference: Section 307.2.2, IMC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson. 7. Smoke detectors located return air ducts, shall be upstream of any outside air connections. Reference: Section 606.1, IMC 2006. 8. Show how the placement of the exhaust outlets conforms to the requirements of Section 401.4.2, IMC 2006. 9. Provide a specification for EF-3. Reference: Section 106.3.1, IMC 2006. |
| 08/22/2008 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. The applicable code for all commercial plumbing projects is the 2006 Uniform Plumbing Code with Local Amendments. Provide an approved appeal to the building official if the plans are to be reviewed to the 2006 IPC (sheet A0.00). 2. Revise the font size used on the drawings to a minimum of 1/8-inch (all upper case). (A 3/32" font may be allowed with an appeal to the building official.) Reference: Section 106.1.1, IBC 2006. 3. The shell drawings for this building used a water demand of 57 GPM as the basis for design of the building water service. This activity proposes a demand of 58 GPM for a space of 5,446 square feet out of a total building area of 24,687 square feet. Clarify how the water demand for the remaining tenant spaces will be accommodated. Reference: Section 610.1, UPC 2006. 4. Provide water isometrics and waste and vent isometrics. Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006. 5. Provide the minimum plumbing facilities required by Table 2902.1 and Section 2902.2, IBC 2006, for business occupancy (e.g. a drinking fountain). 6. Provide a fixture description for the shower, P14. Reference: Sections 401.1, 411.0, and 418.0 UPC 2006. 7. Provide access and working space for the water heater. Reference: Section 505.3, UPC 2006. 8. Indicate where details 1, 2, and 5 on sheet P0.03 occur. Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006. 9. Indicate where fixtures P-13 and P-15 occur. Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006. 10. Indirect waste receptors (detail 5/P0.03) shall not be installed in a closet or cupboard. Reference: Section 804.1, UPC 2006. 11. Provide information to show that the stand pipe drain (detail 5/P0.03) complies with Sections 411.1 and 804.1, UPC 2006. |
| 08/22/2008 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 09/10/2008 | JOHN WILLIAMS | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Passed | |
| 09/10/2008 | LINDA BUCZYNSKI | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | TRANSMIT ORIGINAL DRAWINGS WITH NEXT SUBMITTAL. PLEASE CALL AT 520.837.4907 OR EMAIL AT Linda.Buczynski@tucsonaz.gov IF YOU CARE TO DISCUSS. 1. Revise the font size used on the drawings to a minimum of 1/8-inch. Reference: Section 106.1.1, IBC 2006. 2. Please add the following note in a prominent place on the plans: "All work in patient care areas shall comply with NEC 517.13." 3. It appears that the overcurrent protection for the electrical load violates NEC 422.11 (E) (3). 4. Please add WH-1 to the SES load calculations. 5. Faults F1, F2, F3, and F4 scale out to be aprox. 55', 29', 27', and 70', respectively, not 82', 106', 175', and 215". Please clarify, and recalculate as necessary. 6. Fill in the blanks on the Service Equipment Rating Information. |
| 09/12/2008 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Approved |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 09/23/2008 | CINDY AGUILAR | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 09/23/2008 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |