Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

PRO is currently experiencing an outage. Some documents and records may not be available on PRO momentarily. We apologize for the inconvenience and are working to restore full access.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T08CM02688
Parcel: 105102520

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: RESUBMITTAL

Permit Number - T08CM02688
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
09/11/2008 RAY MAJUTA ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Approved
09/16/2008 ERIC NEWCOMB BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Approved
10/01/2008 ROBERT SHERRY MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Provide updated mechanical energy code compliance calculations. Provide the envelope energy calculations (they were not submitted with the shell package). (Note that Pima, Arizona is a town located in Graham County, northwest of Safford, Arizona. Energy calculations for Tucson using COMcheck should be done using Pima County < 4,000 feet. You will find Pima County by using the drop-down menu under "Codes" on the tool bar of COMcheck.) Reference: Section 101.4, International Energy Conservation Code 2006.
2. Correct keynote 21 on sheet P-1 to show the condensate drain line for RTU-1 and RTU-2 as 1" in size where it drops down the wall to the floor sink. Reference: Section 307.2.2, IMC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson.
3. Coordinate the air flow rates for EF-2 and EF-4 as shown in the exhaust fan schedule and the outside air calculations. Reference: Section 106.3.1, IMC 2006.
4. Provide details to show how the Type I and Type II hoods are supported from the building structure. Reference: Section 302.1, IMC 2006.
5. Comment not resolved; no interlock detail is apparent on the electrical sheets. Provide information to show how the Type I hood is to be interconnected to the kitchen equipment as noted in the exhaust fan schedule on sheet M-3. Reference: Sections 106.3.1 and 507.2.1.1, IMC 2006.
10/01/2008 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Revise the sizes of the waste piping per Table 7-5, with no more than 35 fixture units on a horizontal 3" waste pipe. Reference: Section 703.2, UPC 2006.
2. Provide a direct waste connection for the wash and rinse sections of the 3-compartment sink, with an indirect connection for the sanitizing compartment only. Reference: Sections 304.0 and 801.2.3, UPC 2006.
3. Provide a direct waste connection for the soiled dish table sink (#19). Reference: Section 304.0, UPC 2006.
4. Based on the water calculations provided on sheet P-1, the existing hose bibbs, and the provisions for future development of the adjoining suite (13 fixture units per the shell drawings), the existing 1-1/4" water supply is inadequate to support the proposed demand. Reference: Section 610.1, UPC 2006.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
10/06/2008 GERARDO BONILLA OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed