Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - T08CM02688
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/11/2008 | RAY MAJUTA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 09/16/2008 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 10/01/2008 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Provide updated mechanical energy code compliance calculations. Provide the envelope energy calculations (they were not submitted with the shell package). (Note that Pima, Arizona is a town located in Graham County, northwest of Safford, Arizona. Energy calculations for Tucson using COMcheck should be done using Pima County < 4,000 feet. You will find Pima County by using the drop-down menu under "Codes" on the tool bar of COMcheck.) Reference: Section 101.4, International Energy Conservation Code 2006. 2. Correct keynote 21 on sheet P-1 to show the condensate drain line for RTU-1 and RTU-2 as 1" in size where it drops down the wall to the floor sink. Reference: Section 307.2.2, IMC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson. 3. Coordinate the air flow rates for EF-2 and EF-4 as shown in the exhaust fan schedule and the outside air calculations. Reference: Section 106.3.1, IMC 2006. 4. Provide details to show how the Type I and Type II hoods are supported from the building structure. Reference: Section 302.1, IMC 2006. 5. Comment not resolved; no interlock detail is apparent on the electrical sheets. Provide information to show how the Type I hood is to be interconnected to the kitchen equipment as noted in the exhaust fan schedule on sheet M-3. Reference: Sections 106.3.1 and 507.2.1.1, IMC 2006. |
| 10/01/2008 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Revise the sizes of the waste piping per Table 7-5, with no more than 35 fixture units on a horizontal 3" waste pipe. Reference: Section 703.2, UPC 2006. 2. Provide a direct waste connection for the wash and rinse sections of the 3-compartment sink, with an indirect connection for the sanitizing compartment only. Reference: Sections 304.0 and 801.2.3, UPC 2006. 3. Provide a direct waste connection for the soiled dish table sink (#19). Reference: Section 304.0, UPC 2006. 4. Based on the water calculations provided on sheet P-1, the existing hose bibbs, and the provisions for future development of the adjoining suite (13 fixture units per the shell drawings), the existing 1-1/4" water supply is inadequate to support the proposed demand. Reference: Section 610.1, UPC 2006. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/06/2008 | GERARDO BONILLA | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |