Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: CELL TOWER/ANTENNAS
Permit Number - T08CM02663
Review Name: CELL TOWER/ANTENNAS
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/04/2008 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 08/06/2008 | JAY HOGAN | COMMUNICATIONS | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 08/11/2008 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | DSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: 4110 S. Houghton T08CM02663 Cell Tower (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: August 11, 2008 1. The Cell Tower plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning acknowledges receipt of the approved Special Exception but was not able to find any documentation that approved the Scenic Corridor Overlay Zone. Zoning cannot approve the cell tower plan until documentation approving the Scenic Corridor Overlay Zone has been provided. 3. Zoning will re-review the Cell Tower plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved Special Exception process and Scenic Corridor Overlay Zone. Additional comments may be forthcoming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956 C:\planning\grading\t08cm02663.doc |
| 08/12/2008 | RAY MAJUTA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 08/13/2008 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. 1/8" LETTERING ON ALL DRAWINGS REQUIRED UNLESS A WRITTEN APPEAL IS APPROVED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL, JESSIE SANDERS. THIS APPROVED APPEAL MUST ACCOMPANY DRAWINGS SUBMITTED FOR CHECKING. 2. SPECIAL INSPECTIONS REQUIRED FOR THOSE ITEMS LISTED IN WORKFLOW UNDER 'CONDITIONS'. 3. SHEET A-4; PAGE 6 OF CALCULATIONS FOR PRE-FAB BUILDING: THE REINFORCEMENT IN THE CALCULATIONS (3-#5 TOP, MIDDLE AND BOTTOM) DOES NOT AGREE WITH THE REINFORCEMENT SHOWN IN SECTION 3/A-4. CLARIFY. 4. SHEET A-4; FLOOR PLAN: FOOTING DENOTED IN SECTION 4/A-4 IS LOCATED ON THE FOUNDATION PLAN IN THE MIDDLE OF THE BUILDING. THIS DOES NOT FALL UNDER THE INTERIOR WALL INDICATED ON THE FLOOR PLAN. CLARIFY. 5. DUPONT BUILDING CALCULATIONS PAGE 1: UPDATE CALCULATIONS FOR 2006 IBC REQUIREMENTS. 6. DUPONT BUILDING CALCULATIONS PAGE 1: REVISE SOIL REPORT INFORMATION PER SHEET SP-2. 7. SHEET A-5; PAGE 3 OF CALCULATIONS FOR WALL DESIGN: SECTION 3/A-5 DENOTES WALL ABOVE GRADE AS 6'-0" MINIMUM, WHILE THE CALCULATION ONLY CONSIDERS 6'-0" MAXIMUM HEIGHT. COORDINATE. 8. SHEET A-5; SECTION 3: NOTE INDICATES BLOCK IS 4"X8"X16", BUT SHOWN AS 8"X8". CLARIFY. |
| 08/21/2008 | DROBEY1 | PLANNING-CITY HALL | REVIEW | Needs Review |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 09/11/2008 | DELMA ROBEY | APPROVAL SHELF | Completed |
| 09/11/2008 | DELMA ROBEY | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 09/11/2008 | DELMA ROBEY | REJECT SHELF | Completed |