Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Number: T08CM02643
Parcel: 138071030

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: RESUBMITTAL

Permit Number - T08CM02643
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
09/19/2008 JASON GREEN ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied DATE: September 19, 2008
SUBJECT: 802 W Calle Francita- Enclosure of a carport to an existing single-family residence
TO: Victoria Aguilar
LOCATION: T15S R13E Sec11, Ward 1
REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM
ACTIVITY: T08CM02643 (Site Plan) and T08OT01838 (Floodplain Use Permit)


SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Development Services Department has received and reviewed the Site Plan (T08CM02643), Floodplain Use Permit (T08OT01838), Proposed cost estimate and a property report from CRS/PowerTool Real Estate for the enclosure of the existing carport for the above referenced property and does not recommend approval of the Site Plan or Floodplain Use Permit at this time.

The subject property is located within a mapped City of Tucson Flood Hazard Area as shown on the Flood Hazard Maps associated with a tributary of the Mission Park Wash. Any improvements to the existing structure are considered a substantial improvement to an existing floodprone structure if the value of the new improvement is 50% or more than the assessed/appraised value of the existing structure. Please note that as per the Substantial Improvement & Substantial Damage Rule: A Guideline for Permitting, dated October 2003 only one 3-foot wide doorway may be provided between the common wall of the existing structure and the new improvement. If more than one 3-foot wide linking doorway is proposed for the new improvement, and/or the improvements are determined to be substantial, then the entire existing structure and improved portions of the structure must be brought into compliance by elevation of the floors 1-foot above the regulatory flood elevation. In order to help you permit the addition we will need the following information from you.

1) Restated: The cost estimate submitted (in pencil and without a contractor's logo or the name of the person who prepared the estimate) does not satisfy the requirements per the National Flood Insurance Program. Provide a cost estimate, prepared by a licensed contractor or professional construction estimator, for the carport enclosure showing fair market value of the material and labor. Please refer to the relative portions of the Handbook for Arizona Communities on Floodplain Management and the National Flood Insurance Program attached to the hard copy of this letter and plans.

2) Restated: Provide an assessed or appraised value of the existing single family. The assessed or appraised value is for the structure only (excluding land value). The assessed value can be provided by the latest assessment rolls of the county assessor prior to the improvements being started or from a licensed appraiser. This comment was not fully addressed. The supplemental information provided for the Property Report does not separate the land value from the structure value therefore can not be used. Per research from the Pima County Assessors Office it has been determined that the last assessed value for the property that separated the structure value from land value is from 2006 at a value of $44,079, structure only (see enclosed print out of the 2006 assessed value). Unless a new assessed value is provided that separates the structure form land value or an appraisal is performed the 2006 assessed value can be used (50% of the 2006 assessed value is ~$22, 040).

3) Restated: If the cost estimate provided exceeds the 50% threshold then a hydraulic analyses performed by an Arizona Registered Civil Engineer is required to calculate water surface elevations and flow velocities during the 100-year flood event. The analysis must evaluate channel and over bank flow depths and velocities, and scour depths. The lowest finished floor elevation of the proposed enclosure and the single-family residence must be a minimum of one foot above the computed 100-year water surface elevation of the adjacent wash, evaluated at the upstream end of both of the structures. A site plan drawn to scale is needed showing the proposed building location, vertical datum used for calculating the water surface elevation, locations of hydraulic cross sections, floodplain limits, the lowest finished floor elevation for the proposed enclosure and single-family residence, and a detail of the foundation demonstrating that it is founded below the maximum scour depth. The site plan must be sealed by the engineer.

4) Restated: Cumulative values shall be accounted for the building structure, so that tracking of the 50% status is current. No person shall repair or alter property in a piecemeal manner so as to avoid the provisions of Section 26-4.1.a.3, Chapter 26-Floodplain and Erosion Hazard Management.


GENERAL COMMENTS:

Please provide a revised cost estimate from a licensed contractor or professional construction estimator or a new assessed or appraised value of the structure (excluding land value) that address the comments provided above. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments.

If you have any questions, I can be reached at 837-4929.



Jason Green, CFM
Senior Engineer Associate
Engineering Division
Development Services
09/30/2008 KEN VAN KARSEN BUILDING-RESIDENTIAL REVIEW Approved

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
10/06/2008 DELMA ROBEY OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed