Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL NEW
Permit Number - T08CM02521
Review Name: COMMERCIAL NEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07/22/2008 | DAVE MANN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 07/22/2008 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | 07/22/2008 Development Services Department Zoning Review Section Terry Stevens Lead Planner Comments: 1. The building plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning could not verify that the building plan was in compliance with the approved development plan. Please submit two copies of the approved and stamped development, landscape, and NPPO plans with the next building plan submittal. 3. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved site/development plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming. |
| 07/22/2008 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. GENERAL: 1/8" LETTERING ON ALL DRAWINGS IS REQUIRED UNLESS A WRITTEN APPEAL IS APPROVED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL, JESSIE SANDERS. THIS APPROVED APPEAL MUST ACCOMPANY DRAWINGS SUBMITTED FOR CHECKING. 2. COVER SHEET: ARE SEISMIC SHELVING DRAWINGS A DEFFERED SUBMITTAL? IF SO, APPROVAL FROM THE BUILDING OFFICIAL IS REQUIRED. 3. SHEET SP2: PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR THE 30' TALL FLAG POLE. 4. SHEET SP2.2: PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR THE BATTERY RECYCLING ENCLOSURE. 5. SHEET A1; FLOOR PLAN: SECTIONS 1-A3.2/4-A3.2/5-A3.2 (ON GRIDS B AND J) INDICATE JOISTS IN WRONG DIRECTION. CLARIFY. 6. SHEET A1; FLOOR PLAN: SECTION 1-A3.2 (ON GRID H) INDICATES JOISTS IN WRONG DIRECTION. CLARIFY. 7. SHEET A1; FLOOR PLAN: SECTIONS 1-A3.5/2-A3.5/3-A3.5 (ON GRIDS 1 AND 8) INDICATE JOISTS IN WRONG DIRECTION. CLARIFY. 8. SHEET A1; FLOOR PLAN: SECTION 1-A3.3 ON GRID B.1 (EAST OF GRID 3.2), INDICATES A STEEL BEAM BEARING ELEMENT. THIS SHOULD BE A JOIST GIRDER. VERIFY. 9. SHEET A6; OFFICE PLAN: IN STOCK ROOM, JIB CRANE KEYNOTE 9.10 IS INCORRECT. VERIFY. 10. SHEET GA2 IS MISSING FROM ONE SET. 11. COVER SHEET: PLACE SEISMIC SHELVING DRAWINGS IN PROPER ORDER IN SET. ALL THREE SHEETS ARE IN THIS SET. 12. SHEET S2.1; DETAIL 16: VERTICAL WALL REINFORCING (2-#6) ARE NOTED AS "CL OF WALL". CLARIFY. 13. SHEET S2; DETAIL 10: MC12 INDICATES "1/2" DIA. X 0'-4" HSA AT 12" OC". HOWEVER, 2 HSA ARE SHOWN. CLARIFY. 14. SHEET S6; DETAIL 9: AT FIN FLR ELEVATION NOTATION, ADD 'REF' TO "FDN PLAN FF EL". 15. SHEET S2; DETAIL 13: LOCATION OF PILASTERS COULD NOT BE LOCATED ON PLAN. VERIFY. 16. SECTION 16-S2: PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR LIGHT POLE FOUNDATION. 17. SHEET S1; DETAIL 12-S2.1: FROM THE TOP OF THE PEDESTAL (99'-4") TO THE TOP OF THE FOOTING (98'-8") IS ONLY 8". PROVIDE AN OPTION FOR EXPANSION/EPOXY ANCHORS IN PLACE OF THE C9 BOLTS (REQUIRE 1'-5" EMBEDMENT PER SCHEDULE). 18. SHEET S3; SECTION 6-S4.1: SECTION REFERS TO S3 FOR POST SIZE. ONE NOTE ON RACK D WAS FOUND. PROVIDE ADDITIONAL NOTES ON OTHER RACKS FOR CLARITY. 19. SECTION 8-S5: TITLE DENOTING "BACK WALL" SHOULD BE REVISED SINCE THIS SECTION IS ALSO CUT ON SIDE WALLS. VERIFY. 20. SHEET S3.1; PHARMACY PLAN: REFERENCE PHARMACY PLAN ON ROOF FRAMING PLAN. DENOTE GRID LINES ON PHARMACY FRAMING PLAN. 21. SECTION 10-S5: WELD NOTE FOR JOIST STABILIZER PLATE (ABOVE) SHOULD GIVE A WELD LENGTH. 22. SECTION 3-S5: WELD NOTE FOR STABILIZER PLATE (BELOW) SHOULD GIVE A WELD LENGTH. 23. SECTION 14-S5.1: ADD NOTE FOR OUTSIDE WALL REINFORCING. |
| 07/24/2008 | JOHN WILLIAMS | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Needs Review | Waiting for approval of structural department for final determination of square footage. |
| 07/29/2008 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Provide the referenced civil drawings showing the size and route of the building sewer and the building water supply along with the location and size of both the water meter and the reduced pressure backflow preventer assembly. Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006. 2. Complete the waste and vent isometrics for the retail and grocery areas by indicating the trap sizes and the pipe sizes. Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006. 3. Coordinate the natural gas schematic, the gas piping on the plumbing plan, and the gas pipe sizing table. Reference: Sections 103.2.3 and 1217.0, UPC 2006. 4. Show how the temperature of the hot water supply to the public lavatory L1 is controlled. Reference: Section 413.1, UPC 2006 and Section 504.3, IECC 2006. 5. Show that the restroom floors slope toward the floor drains. Reference: Section 411.2, UPC 2006. 6. Provide and show on the plans, upper terminal cleanouts on horizontal drainage pipes exceeding 5 feet in length (horizontal drain lines serving sinks require cleanouts regardless of length). Reference: Section 707.4, UPC 2006. 7. The 2-way cleanout shown in Detail 5/A0.0 is in violation of Section 707.6, UPC 2006. (The 2-way cleanout referenced in exception 4, Section 707.4 is a single, approved fitting, not a field assembly of combination wye and 1/8th bends.) 8. Provide justification for the 18-foot long horizontal tailpiece for the floor drain at the compactor pad. Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006. 9. Provide accessible cleanouts in each vent for the combination waste and vent system. Reference: Section 910.8, UPC 2006. |
| 07/31/2008 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Revise the font size used on the drawings to a minimum of 1/8-inch (all upper case). Reference: Section 106.1.1, IBC 2006. 2. The minimum insulation for ducts located in indirectly conditioned spaces within the building envelope is R-4.2 (installed). Reference: Section 503.2.7, IECC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson. 3. The minimum insulation for ducts located outside of the building envelope or in a space that freely communicates with the outside is R-8. Reference: Section 503.2.7, IECC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson 4. Provide information to show how the condensate drain system has been sized. Reference: Section 307.2.2, IMC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson. 5. Section 403.3, IMC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson allows the use of the ASHRAE 62-1-2004 ventilation calculation procedure provided that the default occupant densities and combined outdoor air rates are used. 6. Provide information on the sequence of operation for the pharmacy restroom exhaust to show that recirculation of the air from the restroom will not occur. Reference: Section 403.2.1, IMC 2006. 7. Provide the operating weights for the exhaust hoods and their associated exhaust fans. Reference: Section 106.3.1, IMC 2006. 8. Provide structural calculations and details to show that the Type I and Type II hoods are supported from the building structure in accordance with Section 507.6, IMC 2006. Reference: Section 302.1, IMC 2006. |
| 07/31/2008 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Denied | Provide the referenced civil drawings showing the size of the building water supply along with the location and size of both the water meter and the reduced pressure backflow preventer assembly. Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006. |
| 08/14/2008 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 08/19/2008 | LINDA BUCZYNSKI | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | TRANSMIT ORIGINAL DRAWINGS WITH NEXT SUBMITTAL. PLEASE CALL AT 520.837.4907 OR EMAIL AT Linda.Buczynski@tucsonaz.gov IF YOU CARE TO DISCUSS. 1. Could not discern lighting fixture type in Receiving. Please eliminate overwrites, and resubmit on minimum font size of 1/8". Legibility an issue on this sheet. Interior lighting to be reviewed after this is cleared up. 2. Provide fixture type for flagpole and bollard lights. Not on E1 or E1.1. 3. Add flagpole lighting to lumen count on Sheet E1.3. 4. Please get the lighting fixtures on a single symbol key. Sheets E1.2 and E1.3 do not coincide. 5. Security lighting on Ckts H1P-18 and H1P-20, with 4 and 5 quantity Fixture B (175W MH) respectively, would have 0.70 and 0.88 KVA respectively of connected load, not 0.44 and 0.55. Please clarify. 6. Overwrites on E1.1 Detail 2. See the above, will review this portion after clarifications. 7. Not all lighting fixture types are clear on Detail 1 Sheet E1.1. 8. Provide cut sheets for all exterior lighting. 9. Identify fixture type on Site Lighting Plan, Sheet E1.2. Coordinate with Lighting Fixture Schedule, and clarify lighting source type, and power requirements. This way NEC and Lighting Code compliance may be evaluated. 10. Ckt HIP-20, Detail 3 Sheet E2.3, powers a fan-powered terminal. Panel schedule indicates security lighting. Clarify this, and in all other cases of branch circuit allocation. 11. Panels L4D2-1 and L4D2-2 are both shown on Detail 1 Sheet GE2. However, there is a panel schedule for L4D2 only, a 42-circuit panel. Please clarify. 12. Panel L4D2-1 and XFMR T4D do not appear to have the required depth of Working Clearance. Reference NEC 110.26 (A) (1). 13. Could not determine the power source for Panelboards CHA, CHB, CHC, CHD. 14. Will check service load calculations after comment #13 above is satisfied. Do not see that CHA, CHB, CHC, CHD are included. 15. Please provide exact sizing of Main Bonding Jumper on Detail 2 Sheet E4. Reference NEC 250.24 (C) (1). 16. The feeder to Rack C, ampacity 150A, is not properly protected by the 175A CB at MSB2. 17. Feeder to Panel L4D2, 2/0 Cu with ampacity of 175A, appears to violate NEC 240.21 (C) (2) (b) as it terminates in a 225A CB. 18. On the Fault Analysis Summary, please clarify how H4B and H4C would have 400' and 500' respectively, when they are directly side-by-side in EDC4. Typical for all such cases, please recheck distances. 19. For all series rated panels, specify the line side and load side ratings, and verify compliance with NEC 240.86 (C). 20. Panelboards on the racks are all rated for 10K. However, Rack B and Rack C have greater than 13KA available, per Fault Analysis. 21. Plot location of all Fire Pump-related equipment on the Electrical plans. |
| 08/26/2008 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Denied | 1. WALMART 2. NEED TO BUILD PUBLIC SEWER - NEEDS 8TH FLOOR WASTEWATER PUBLIC SEWER CONTRUCTION PERMIT - NEEDS DSC/WW/1ST FLOOR HOLD HARMLESS LETTER 3. NEED TO SHOW LOCATION METHOD OF CONNECTION TO PUBLIC SEWER 4. NEED TO PERMIT ON - SITE PRIVATE SEWER - NEED DEQ REVIEW & APPROVAL TO CONSTRUCT ON - SITE PRIVATE SEWER 5. NEED COPY OF ON - SITE PRIVATE SEWER FOR BASE MAP UPDATE |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 09/25/2008 | CPIERCE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |