Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - SITE ALL
Permit Number - T08CM02440
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - SITE ALL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11/10/2008 | DAVE MANN | FIRE | REVIEW | Denied | Fire sprinklers will be required. Show location of fire service. |
| 11/10/2008 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 11/12/2008 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | DSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Terry Stevens Lead Planner PROJECT: T08CM02440 1106 N. Camilla Blvd. Site Plan TRANSMITTAL DATE: 11/12/08 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with redlines and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. DS 2-02.2.1.7 Per LUC Sec. 3.2.3.1.D this project has a perimeter yard indicator of "CC". Per LUC Sec. 3.2.6.4 the required setback when adjacent to a C-2 zoned property is the height of the structure. The proposed building does not meet this requirement for setbacks from the south property line based on a wall height of 21'-9" (includes the parapet wall height) + 6" from finished floor to grade for a total wall height of 22'-3" which is then the required setback for the proposed building. Revise dimension on the site plan (indicating a 10' setback) as well as detail #8 on sheet C5. Clearly indicate on details 7 & 8 of C5 that all wall height measurements are from the adjacent grade and not finished floor. On detail #7 of C5 the indicated wall height must include the 1' - 6" parapet and the 6" from finished floor to grade. The tallest wall height is then 22'-3", ¾ of this height is then 16'-6" which is the required setback. The second floor wall height is then 17'- 7", ¾ of this height is then 13'- 2" which is the required setback. Per LUC Sec. 3.2.6.6 overhangs are allowed to project 2' into the required setback. The overhangs indicated on detail #7 are projecting 2'-6" into the required setback, Provide the dimensioned length of all overhangs. Revise. A Design Development Option (DDO) can be applied for to reduce the required setbacks. 2. Clearly indicate the required curbing on the east side of parking space #40. 3. In the land use code data on sheet C1 in the perimeter yard portion, revise note to read: "North/East: Greater of 10 feet or ¾ times the wall height." 4. The height of the south and east buildings as indicated on the site plan appear to be in conflict with the height of the north building and details 7 & 8. Revise. 5. Provide a pedestrian circulation path to the stairs located on the west side of the north building. The pedestrian circulation path should be relocated north of the trash enclosure and then connect to the ROW sidewalk. A relocation of the trash enclosure would be required. The crosswalk indicated can then be removed from conflicting with the maneuverability area for the trash enclosure. Clearly indicate location of all stairs and provide direction of either up or down. Clearly indicate width and location of balconies for access to the second floor.. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Terry Stevens, (520) 837-4961 C:\planning\cdrc\DSD\T08CM02440-2.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised site plan and additional requested documents |
| 11/20/2008 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | Within vehicular use areas, every (uncovered) parking space shall be located within forty (40) feet of the trunk of a canopy tree (as measured from the center of the tree trunk) per LUC 3.7.2.3.A.1.a. Some of the trees along the south property line do not fall within 40 feet of a canopy tree trunk. |
| 11/21/2008 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | NPPO | REVIEW | Approved | Exception. |
| 11/25/2008 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Provide the basis for the size of the domestic water service pipe and for the buildings (e.g. water pressure range, developed length, fixture units, etc). Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006. 2. Tucson Water will provide only one meter per building and the utility water meter size shall be determined by the water demand. Since individual dwelling units in new multi-family housing are required to have individual water meters, private meters will be needed. 3. Revise the site utility plan to show the location of the reduced pressure backflow assembly on the drawings, specify the reduced pressure backflow assembly being installed, and indicate the size of the assembly. Reference COT Ordinance 9976, http://www.tucsonaz.gov/water/docs/backflow-ord.pdf 4. Provide cleanouts in the building sewer at intervals not exceeding 100 feet. Reference: Section 719.1, UPC 2006. 5. Clarify the material proposed for use for the building sewers (SAS). Reference: Section 701.1, UPC 2006. |
| 12/11/2008 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | December 12, 2008 Camilla Place T08CM02440 1. Solid waste truck access to the container location doesn't seem to meet the accessibility standard of Development Standard 6-01. With the location change requested by the zoning reviewer to provide safe pedestrian circulation, the maneuverability will be adversely impacted. Discuss the access with Andy Vera at Environmental Services for acceptable access. |