Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T08CM02434
Parcel: 107020130

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: SITE

Permit Number - T08CM02434
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
07/14/2008 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Denied DSD TRANSMITTAL

FROM: Steve Shields
Lead Planner

PROJECT: Copper/State Bolt & Nut Co.
T08CM02434
Site Plan (1st Review)

TRANSMITTAL DATE: July 14, 2008

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed.

1. This site plan was reviewed for compliance with the City of Tucson Development Standards (D.S.) and Land Use Code (LUC) for full code compliance.

2. It appears that there is some type of lot line re-alignment or lot split proposed for this project. The lot line re-alignment/lot split must be approved by the City of Tucson prior to approval of this site plan.

3. D.S.2-02.2.1.A.5 Remove the existing lot line between the lots and revise the lot dimensions to reflect the new property line dimensions.

4. D.S.2-02.2.1.A.5 As there is additional angled parking proposed provide a detail for the angled parking. Ensure to include the "A" Parking Angle, "B" Space Width, "C" Space Depth and "E" Curb Length dimension on the detail.

5. D.S.2-02.2.1.A.5 The wheel stop location dimension is not shown correctly. Per D.S. 3-05.2.3.C.2 When wheel stop curbing is used, it is to be located two and one-half (2½) feet from the front of the parking space. (See Figure 5.). This dimension is not from the center of the wheel stop.

6. D.S.2-02.2.1.A.12 A continuous pedestrian circulation path/accessible route is required to connect all areas of the development and the pedestrian circulation path located in any adjacent streets. This said a sidewalk is required to connect the proposed parking along the northwest and northeast side of the property to the existing continuous pedestrian circulation path/accessible route.

7. D.S.2-02.2.1.A.12 The approved site plan for this parcel and the one to the southeast provided a continuous pedestrian circulation path/accessible route between buildings. This continuous pedestrian circulation path/accessible route must be maintained as the two (2) parcels were developed as one. By relocated the existing handicapped parking space it appears that this route has been removed.

8. D.S.2-02.2.1.A.12 The handicapped vehicle ramps shown on the site plan do not appear to match what is shown on the grading plan, please clarify.

9. D.S.2-02.2.1.A.12 Per D.S. 3-05.2.3.C.1 some type of barrier will be required along the entire length of the northwest side of the proposed Parking Area Access Lane (PAAL) to prevent vehicles from accessing an un-improved area.

10. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.13 If applicable provide the location, type, size and height of existing and proposed freestanding signage and billboards.

11. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.14 Show the maneuvering area for the loading space on the plan.

12. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.20 There are two (2) 15'x20' TEP easements located at the northwest/southwest corner of the two (2) parcels, show on the plan along with the recordation information.

13. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.20 Per the final plat for this subdivision the 21'-8" sewer easement called out along the northeast property line should only be 20'-0", clarify.

14. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.20 Per the final plat for this subdivision the 19'-6" drainage easement called out along the northeast property line should only be 19'-0", clarify.

15. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.20 A twenty-four (24) foot ingress/egress easement will be required for the twenty-four (24) PAAL along the northwest property line. Show the easement along with the recordation information on the plan.

16. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.25 If applicable provide existing and proposed freestanding lighting layout and type. Provide a detail; list the height of pole and type of lighting

17. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.25 Show the existing zoning for the parcels to the northeast.

18. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.31 Show the existing use on the plan

19. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.31 The proposed use under "ZONING CODE CHECK" shows "GENERAL MANUFACTURING", within the footprint of the existing building the use shows "S-2 STORAGE = PRIMARY USE OF T.I." please clarify the proposed use. If the proposed use is General Manufacturing, add the subject to: Sec. 3.5.5.1.B, .F, .G, and .H for the proposed use.

20. As the last approved site plan shows parcels 107-02-0130 and 107-02-0140 developed as one (1) site, sharing common elements, the required calculations for D.S.2-02.2.2.A need to include both parcels. Additional comments maybe forth coming.

21. D.S.2-02.2.2.A.4 For clarification the bicycle parking calculation is based on total number of vehicle parking spaces provided not the number of vehicle parking spaces required.



22.

23. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.31 List the existing use and provide the subject to, General Manufacturing "34", subject to: Sec. 3.5.5.1.B, .F, .G, and .H for the proposed use.

24. Additional comments may be forth coming depending on how each comment has been addressed.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956.

C:\planning\site\t08cm02300

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised site plan and additional requested documents.
07/15/2008 DAVE MANN FIRE REVIEW Denied Code review section of plans indicate S-2 occupancy. The tenent will be storing significant quantities of aeresol paint cans, a hazardous material.
Please revise classification.
Indicate location of existing fire hydrant(s), with dimensions to property lines.
Indicate location and size of fire service line.
07/17/2008 RONALD BROWN ZONING HC SITE REVIEW Denied 1. AS REQUIRED BY ZONING COMMENT 6, A CONCRETE ACCESSIBLE ROUTE ON NORTHWEST AND NORTH EAST SIDE MUST BE PROVIDED. THE PREFERRED SEPARATION FROM THE PARKING PAVING AREA IS A 6" HIGH SIDEWALK AND CURB.
2. DELETE THE TWO DETECTABLE WARNINGS SHOWN AT THE END OF THE EXISTING SIDEWALK TO REMAIN AND THE NEW CONCRETE WALK CONNECTION TO THE PUBLIC R.O.W. AT NORTH END OF FREEWAY INDUSTRIAL LOOP.
2. DETECTABLE WARNINGS AT ACCESSIBLE PARKING AISLES ARE IN WRONG POSITION AND ARE NOT REQUIRED. DELETE OR MOVE TO SIDEWALK AREA.
3. PROVIDE SPOT GRADES ALONG ACCESSIBLE ROUTE TO SHOW SLOPE COMPLIANCE WITH 2006 IBC/ICC 117.1, SECTION 403.3.
4. MAXIUM SLOPES FOR SIDEWALK RAMPS AT PARKING AISLES IS 1:12; SECTION 405.
5. SHOW RAMP ON EAST SIDE OF EAST ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE SIDEWALK RAMP
6. NOTE 8, SHEET A1.0 CHANGE TO 4' WIDE CONCRETE WALKWAY, ACCESSIBLE ROUTE.
7. DETAIL5/A1.1:
A. RAMP SLOPE TO BE 1:12 NOT 1:15
B. PROVIDE 4' WALK BEHIND THE 2' WIDE DETECTABLE WARNING
C. DETECTABLE WARNING NOT REQUIRED BY ICC 117.1, OWNER OPTION
D. MAX SLOPE FOR ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE AND ASILE IS 1:48, BOTH WAYS
8. DETAIL 3/A1.1: OBTAIN ACCESSIBLE SIGNAGE FROM PARKWISE REFERENCE, CONTACT DON ANGEL,
429-3318. CHANGE FINE TO $518.00
9. DELETE DETAIL 7/A1.1, NOT NEEDED
07/23/2008 BIANCA RAMIREZ ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied DATE: July 23, 2008
SUBJECT: Site Plan
TO: MPE
LOCATION: 3162 N Freeway Industrial, T13S, R13E, Section 34, Ward 1
REVIEWERS: Bianca Ramirez, CFM
ACTIVITY: T08CM02434 (First Review)


RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Site Plan

SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Development Services Department has received and reviewed the proposed site plan for the above referenced property. Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the site plan at this time. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal.

Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the site plan.

Site Plan:

1. The most recent aerial photo of the property does not match what is depicted on the site plan. Please modify site plan to represent actual dimensions and/or clarify. If appears that the development incorporates multiple lot within the design. See zoning comments for comments regarding requirements for lot(s).
2. . Site plan is to meet all minimum Federal ADA requirements. See comments from Ron Brown, RA, Structural Plans Examiner for all handicap access requirements.
3. Provide the following information as part of the location map information required: Section, Township, and Range along with section lines and section corners clearly identified.
4. Verify that all lot bearings have been called out on site plan per D.S. 2-02.2.1.5
5. Modify site plan to call out all existing and future sight visibility triangles per D.S. 2-02.2.1.10.
6. Verify that all points of egress and ingress are identified on site plan. Include all locations, width of driveways and parking area access lanes (P.A.A.L.) per D.S. 2-02.2.1.11.
7. Fully dimension maneuvering area(s) per D.S. 2-02.2.1.14. Provide (label and dimension) the required onsite maneuvering area for the loading zone that is shown adjacent to the proposed building. Refer to AASHTO for the national standards for turning radii. The maneuverable area has to be provided onsite for the loading zone. If onsite maneuverability can not be achieved then a variance must be submitted and approved for offsite maneuvering within the public right of way. If a variance is applied for then the site plan cannot be approved until such variance is approved.
8. Please provide Drainage patterns and finished grades per D.S. 2-02.2.1.16.
9. Please list estimated cut & fill quantities on site plan per D.S. 2-02.2.1.17. Disclaimer is acceptable but actual cut and fill quantities should be called out on the site plan.
10. DS Sec.2.02.2.1.A.16: Provide drainage arrows and locations of all concentration points. Specifically show roof down spout locations proposed buildings at pedestrian circulation areas. A detail for the dimension of the proposed scuppers that are used for collecting onsite roof drainage at all pedestrian sidewalk is required, refer to City of Tucson details. Any scuppers proposed under the sidewalk will be designed and constructed to convey the 10-year flood flow. Provide a drainage statement showing scupper calculations that demonstrate that the 10-year flood flow is contained under the sidewalk.
11. Clearly indicated whether Freeway Industrial Loop is either public or private.
12. Show existing and future right-of-way dimensions per D.S. 2-02.2.1.19. If the dimension for both existing and future ½ right of way is the same label as Existing/Future ½ ROW on site plan.
13. DS Sec. 2-05.2.4.H.2: Provide the right-of-way (ROW) recordation information for Mountain Ave and 21st St.
14. Verify that all easement of record have been graphically shown on the plan together with recording docket and page per D.S. 2-02.2.1.20.
15. Call out dimensions from street monument lines to existing and proposed curbs, sidewalks, driveways, and utility lines per D.S. 2-02.2.1.21.
16. Please provide existing topographic contours at intervals not exceeding two (2) feet and/or spot elevations as pertinent and Bench Mark based on City of Tucson Datum, including City Field Book and page number per D.S. 2-02.2.1.23. Provide contour interval on plan.
17. Verify that site plan show all fences, walls, or vegetation for screening and sight visibility by type, material, height, location and spacing per D.S. 2-02.2.1.27.
18. Show site plan activity number in the lower right hand corner of all sheets per D.S. 2-02.2.1.29.
19. Show refuse container location, size, and access thereto fully dimensioned per D.S. 2-02.2.1.32 and D.S. 6-01.0.
20. A permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information.
21. Please show a typical cross section of the P.A.A.L. or call out the percentage of slopes. Call out the grade break at the driveway, if applicable.
22. List the consulting engineer and the owner/developer on the plans with the pertinent information.
23. Add note: "Depress all landscaped areas 6" maximum for water harvesting".
24. Indicate all symbols on plans and reference in legend.
25. Call out Freeway Industrial Loop as a "Local" Street.
26. Fence appears to be located within SVT, please clarify.
27. Revise site plan so that proposed development is not located within any identified and/or recorded easement(s).
28. Additional comments may be forthcoming.

Drainage Report:

1. Revise drainage report to include address identified on site plan application.
2. Revise location map so that it can be read.
3. Additional comments may be forthcoming.

If you have any questions, I can be reached at 837-4928 or Bianca.Ramirez@tucsonaz.gov

Bianca C. Ramirez
Engineering Associate
City of Tucson/Development Services Department
201 N. Stone Avenue
P.O. Box 27210
Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210
(520) 837-4928 office
(520) 879-8010 fax
07/31/2008 JOE LINVILLE LANDSCAPE REVIEW Denied 1) Show and identify existing plants to remain in place on the landscape plan. DS 2-07.2.2.A.1.e. Show the existing irrigation system.

2) Rigid irrigation pipes and flexible drip system irrigation lines under paved surfaces will be contained in pipe sleeves. DS 2-06.5.4.A.2

3) Vegetation or structures higher than thirty (30) inches must be located outside of the sight visibility triangles far enough to eliminate conflicts as the plants mature. Revise the landscape plan to locate red bird of paradise. LUC 3.7.3.4

4) A vehicular use area must be provided with post barricades or wheel stop curbing designed to prevent parked vehicles from extending beyond the property lines; damaging adjacent landscaping, walls, or buildings and to prevent vehicles from driving onto unimproved portions of the site.
per DS 3-05.2.3.C. Revise the plans as necessary to provide a suitable barrier along the northwest boundary of the parking lot.

5) Revise the landscape plans to show the limits of grading. DS 2-07.2.2.B.5

6) Revise the plans to indicate a refuse pickup/storage location. DS 2-02.2.1.A.32

7) All easements of record must be graphically shown on the plan together with recording docket and page reference. Is an easement for the development on LOT 7 anticipated? DS 2-02.2.1.A.20

8) The required landscape inspections required for previous development on the site may not have been completed. We have not verified that the approved landscape plan has been implemented. Approvals for this portion of the project may affect the availability of additional approvals.
08/06/2008 JOE LINVILLE NPPO REVIEW Approved Exception per landscape plan approval.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
08/20/2008 THAUSER1 OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
08/20/2008 GERARDO BONILLA REJECT SHELF Completed