Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - SITE ALL
Permit Number - T08CM02322
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - SITE ALL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/04/2009 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Neither Northerly marked crossings are code compliant: a. The Marked Crossing from the building to Accessible Parking Space is located in a position that require parked autos to back up into the crossing creating a hazardous situation. b. The marked crossing from the parking aisle to the Alvernon pedestrian way is non compliant. Reference ICC/ANSI 117.1, Sections 502.4.1 and 502.8. The parking asile must adjoin the accessible route not be the accessible route. |
| 05/07/2009 | BIANCA RAMIREZ | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: May 7, 2009 SUBJECT: Arquitecto E.J. Ornelas TO: Randy LOCATION: 17Address, T14S, R14E, Section 18, Ward 5 N Alvernon Way REVIEWERS: Bianca Ramirez, CFM ACTIVITY: T0CM02322 (Second Review) RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Site Plan SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Development Services Department has received and reviewed the proposed site plan for the above referenced property. Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the site plan at this time. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the site plan with the next submittal. Site Plan: 1. Full code compliance review required per zoning, full site review will be completed. 2. Lot combo request and recorded Covenant Regarding Development and Use of Real Property required. 3. Complied 4. Revise property description accordingly once lot combo has been completed. 5. Complied 6. Verify that all necessary existing and future sight visibility triangles are shown within site plan per D.S. 2-02.2.1.10. 7. Complied 8. Complied 9. Complied 10. Complied 11. Complied 12. Please list estimated cut & fill quantities per D.S. 2-02.2.1.17. It appears that cut and fill will not be occurring for the proposed patio. However, as part of the site submittal requirement estimated cut and fill quantities are required to be indicated on the plans so that it is clear to the inspector that no cut in fill is to be taking place. If not cut and fill is taking place indicate the quantity of zero (0) on the plan. Estimated cut and Fill: Cut = 0 and Fill = 0 will suffice. 13. DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.18: Revise the site plan to call out Pima Street and Alvernon Way as a Major Streets and Routes (MS&R). Provide a note stating that the site plan is in conformance with the MS&R overlay zone criteria. 14. Show dimensioned right-of-way, including any applicable Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Plan right-of-way per D.S. 2-02.2.1.19. Please show label dimensioned for both existing and future right-of-ways per D.S. 2-02.2.1.19. Provide letter from Craig as discussed at counter 5/7/09. 15. DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.19: Label the 11-foot future sidewalk and curb area on the site plan to verify that all improvements are located outside of the future ROW. 16. Complied 17. Dimension from street monument lines to existing and proposed curbs, sidewalks, driveways, and utility lines per D.S. 2-02.2.1.21. 18. Complied 19. Please provide existing topographic contours at intervals not exceeding two (2) feet and/or spot elevations as pertinent and Bench Mark based on City of Tucson Datum, including City Field Book and page number per D.S. 2-02.2.1.23. Provide contour interval on plan. 20. Complied 21. Provide the site plan activity number in the lower right hand corner of each sheet per D.S. 2-02.2.1.29. 22. A permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information. 23. Acknowledges 24. Complied 25. A floodplain use permit will be required if any work taking place within the identified floodplain limits. 26. Add note: "Depress all landscaped areas 6" maximum for water harvesting". 26. Complied 27. Revise handicap sign to read $532 FINE. 27. Additional comments may be forthcoming. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 837-4928 or Bianca.Ramirez@tucsonaz.gov Bianca C. Ramirez Engineering Associate City of Tucson/Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 837-4928 office (520) 879-8010 fax |
| 05/13/2009 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | Include with re-submittal DDO approval documentation. Indicate on the lower right hand corner of the site plan, the case number, date of approval, and any conditions imposed. |
| 05/18/2009 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | DSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: 1711 N. Alvernon - Convenience Store Expansion T08CM02322 Site Plan (4th Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: May 18, 2009 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. This site plan was reviewed for compliance with the City of Tucson Development Standards (D.S.) and Land Use Code (LUC) for full code compliance for the full site due to a greater than 25% expansion of building area. 2. This comment was not addressed. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.11 The area shown as striped running from the accessible vehicle parking space access aisle to the sidewalk along Alvernon Way is required to be a sidewalk, physically separated from the vehicle use area and a minimum of 4'-0" wide. 3. This comment was not addressed. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.9 The proposed location of the bicycle parking does not meet the requirements of D.S. 2-09.4.1 either relocate to meet the 50' requirement or apply for a Development Standard Modification Request (DSMR). If a DSMR is applied for and approved provide the DSMR Case number, date of approval, what was approved and any conditions of approval on the site plan. 4. This comment was not addressed. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.12 Per D.S. 2-08.3.1 Within all development, a continuous pedestrian circulation path is required. This path must connect all public access areas of the development and the pedestrian circulation path located in any adjacent streets. The area within the development which must be connected include, but are not limited to, all buildings, all bicycle and vehicle parking areas. This said provide the required pedestrian circulation path to the bicycle parking area. 5. This comment has not been addressed. The bicycle parking calculation is not correct. As stated below per LUC Section 3.3.3.5 the minimum number of bicycle parking spaces is two (2) the calculation shows one (1) required. Also per the provided calculation one (1) bicycle parking space is provided but the detail shows that four (4) are provided, please clarify. D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.4 The bicycle parking space calculation in not correct. Per LUC Section 3.3.4 RETAIL TRADE USE GROUP, General Merchandise Sales Bicycle: Eight (8) percent - fifty (50) percent Class 1 and fifty (50) percent Class 2. Per LUC Section 3.3.3.5 Bicycle Parking Requirements. The number of required bicycle parking spaces is calculated as a percentage of the total number of motor vehicle parking spaces provided. If the calculated number of required bicycle parking spaces is less than two (2), the minimum number of required spaces is two (2). Per LUC Section 3.3.7.8.A Any use providing less than fifty (50) motor vehicle parking spaces may substitute Class 2 spaces for Class 1 spaces. This said the required number of bicycle parking spaces is two (2) Class 2. 6. Depending on how the above comments are addressed addition comments may be forth coming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956. C:\planning\site\t08cm02322 RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised site plan and additional requested documents. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 05/28/2009 | CPIERCE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 05/28/2009 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |