Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - SITE ALL
Permit Number - T08CM02322
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - SITE ALL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/04/2009 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | DSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: 1711 N. Alvernon - Convenience Store Expansion T08CM02322 Site Plan (3rd Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: May 4, 2009 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. This site plan was reviewed for compliance with the City of Tucson Development Standards (D.S.) and Land Use Code (LUC) for full code compliance for the full site due to a greater than 25% expansion of building area. 2. This comment was not fully addressed. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.11 The area shown as striped running from the accessible vehicle parking space access aisle to the sidewalk along Alvernon Way is required to be a sidewalk, physically separated from the vehicle use area and a minimum of 4'-0" wide. 3. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.9 The proposed location of the bicycle parking does not meet the requirements of D.S. 2-09.4.1 either relocate to meet the 50' requirement or apply for a Development Standard Modification Request (DSMR). If a DSMR is applied for and approved provide the DSMR Case number, date of approval, what was approved and any conditions of approval on the site plan. 4. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.12 Per D.S. 2-08.3.1 Within all development, a continuous pedestrian circulation path is required. This path must connect all public access areas of the development and the pedestrian circulation path located in any adjacent streets. The area within the development which must be connected include, but are not limited to, all buildings, all bicycle and vehicle parking areas. This said provide the required pedestrian circulation path to the bicycle parking area. 5. This comment has not been addressed. The bicycle parking calculation is not correct. As stated below per LUC Section 3.3.3.5 the minimum number of bicycle parking spaces is two (2) the calculation shows one (1) required. Also per the provided calculation one (1) bicycle parking space is provided but the detail shows that four (4) are provided, please clarify. D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.4 The bicycle parking space calculation in not correct. Per LUC Section 3.3.4 RETAIL TRADE USE GROUP, General Merchandise Sales Bicycle: Eight (8) percent - fifty (50) percent Class 1 and fifty (50) percent Class 2. Per LUC Section 3.3.3.5 Bicycle Parking Requirements. The number of required bicycle parking spaces is calculated as a percentage of the total number of motor vehicle parking spaces provided. If the calculated number of required bicycle parking spaces is less than two (2), the minimum number of required spaces is two (2). Per LUC Section 3.3.7.8.A Any use providing less than fifty (50) motor vehicle parking spaces may substitute Class 2 spaces for Class 1 spaces. This said the required number of bicycle parking spaces is two (2) Class 2. 6. Depending on how the above comments are addressed addition comments may be forth coming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956. C:\planning\site\t08cm02322 RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised site plan and additional requested documents. |
| 05/04/2009 | BIANCA RAMIREZ | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Needs Review | |
| 05/04/2009 | CPIERCE1 | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Needs Review | |
| 05/04/2009 | CPIERCE1 | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Needs Review |