Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE
Permit Number - T08CM02322
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/18/2009 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 02/18/2009 | RBROWN1 | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | NOT A COT PROJECT |
| 02/18/2009 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | DSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: 1711 N. Alvernon - Convenience Store Expansion T08CM02322 Site Plan (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: February 23, 2009 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. This site plan was reviewed for compliance with the City of Tucson Development Standards (D.S.) and Land Use Code (LUC) for full code compliance for the full site due to a greater than 25% expansion of building area. 2. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.2 As this project consists of two (2) parcels, 122-16-232A, 122-16-229B, provide an approved Pima County Lot Combination Request Form and a recorded Covenant Regarding Development and Use of Real Property with the next submittal. The property description (legal description) should be corrected to include both parcels. 3. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.6 Provide the height of the existing canopy, overall and clear. 4. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.7 Show the location of future curb and provide a setback dimension from the existing canopy to the back of future curb for both Alvernon and Pima. All setbacks shall be measured from the existing canopy. The setbacks listed under Zoning Information are incorrect. The street setbacks are 21' or the Height of the structure, measured from the back of future curb. Setbacks the R-2 zoned property should be listed as 1-1/2 times the height of the existing canopy. 5. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.8 Provide a detail for a standard vehicle parking space on the site plan. 6. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.9 As the proposed use is General Merchandise Sales provide the required bicycle parking on the plan along with a detail that includes materials for lighting, paving, and security; fully dimensioned layout; location; specific type of rack and the number of bicycles it supports; 7. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.10 Show the future sight visibility triangles (SVTs) on the plan. 8. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.11 Clearly indicate on the plan weather the parking area access lanes (PAALs), along the east and west side of the existing canopy, are one-way or two-way. Once this comment and comment 3 have been addressed additional comments may be forth coming in regards to PAAL widths. 9. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.11 It appears that the area shown at the northeast corner of the building is striped pavement. This area is required to be sidewalk. 10. Per D.S. 3-05.2.3.C.1 A vehicular use area must be provided with post barricades or wheel stop curbing designed to prevent parked vehicles from extending beyond the property lines; damaging adjacent landscaping, walls, or buildings; or overhanging adjacent sidewalk areas or unpaved areas on or off site and to prevent vehicles from driving onto unimproved portions of the site. This said provide some type of barrier to prevent vehicles from entering the basin and landscape areas and to prevent vehicles from overhanging any property lines. 11. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.13 Provide the type, size and height of the existing sign called out under keynote 13. 12. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.19 Provide a fully dimensioned right-of-way, including any applicable Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Plan right-of-way for both Alvernon and Pima. Based on the MS&R maps there is intersection widening that is applicable for this intersection. 13. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.20 If applicable show all easements of record must be graphically shown on the plan together with recording docket and page reference. 14. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.28 Clearly show the zoning boundary between the C-1 and R-2 zoning on parcel 122-16-229B. 15. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.31 Provide the existing use on the plan. The proposed use should be listed as "GENERAL MERCHANDISE SALES "28", SUBJECT TO: SEC. 3.5.9.2.C" 16. D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.4 The vehicle parking space calculation in not correct. Per LUC Section 3.3.3.8 Fractional Amounts. When the final result of the calculation of required motor vehicle and bicycle parking spaces results in a fractional number, a fraction of one-half (½) or more is adjusted to the next higher whole number, and a fraction of less than one-half (½) is adjusted to the next lower whole number. This said the Required number of vehicle parking spaces is seven (7). 17. D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.4 The bicycle parking space calculation in not correct. Per LUC Section 3.3.4 RETAIL TRADE USE GROUP, General Merchandise Sales Bicycle: Eight (8) percent - fifty (50) percent Class 1 and fifty (50) percent Class 2. Per LUC Section 3.3.3.5 Bicycle Parking Requirements. The number of required bicycle parking spaces is calculated as a percentage of the total number of motor vehicle parking spaces provided. If the calculated number of required bicycle parking spaces is less than two (2), the minimum number of required spaces is two (2). Per LUC Section 3.3.7.8.A Any use providing less than fifty (50) motor vehicle parking spaces may substitute Class 2 spaces for Class 1 spaces. This said the required number of bicycle parking spaces is two (2) Class 2. 18. Based on the current aerial photos it appears that the R-2 zoned portion of this site is being used for storage. Storage is not an allowed use in the R-2 zone and all items must be removed from the site. 19. Depending on how the above comments are addressed addition comments may be forth coming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956. C:\planning\site\t08cm02322 RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised site plan and additional requested documents. |
| 02/24/2009 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. A street landscape border, per Sec. 3.7.2.4 of the LUC, is a landscape area with a minimum width of ten (10) feet, running the full length of the street property line(s) bounding the site except for points of ingress-egress. 2. Include with re-submittal DDO approval documentation. Indicate on the lower right hand corner of the site plan, the case number, date of approval, and any conditions imposed. 3. The site plan and landscape plan must show identical site layout to avoid conflict between the two plans. Ensure that all changes to the site plan are reflected on the landscape plan. |
| 02/25/2009 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Approved | Exception |
| 02/26/2009 | BIANCA RAMIREZ | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | Cannot Approve site plan until all zoning comments have been addressed. |
| 03/09/2009 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. NOTES: a. AT NOTE 24, FILL IN THE BLANK WITH 5'. THIS WILL PROVIDE A 3' CLEAR ACCESSIBLE ROUTE BEHIND THE REQUIRED 2' DEEP DETECTABLE WARNING AT THE MARKED CROSSING. b. AT NOTE 25, DELETE THE REFERENCE TO COT SD 207, THIS IS FOR PUBLIC RIGHTS OF WAY ONLY. REFERENCE 2006 IBC, ICC ANSI 117.1, SECTION 405, SIDEWALK RAMPS AND 406.12 MARKED CROSSINGS. 2. AT THE MARKED CROSSINGSTO PIMA STREET, PROVIDE A LARGE SCALE DETAIL OF BOTH ENDS OF THE MARKED CROSSING SHOWING ALL COMPLIANT DIMENSIONS, SLOPES, RAMPS, DETECTABLE WARNINGS AND SPOT GRADES TO SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION S 404, 406.12, 406 .14 AND 403.3. 3. TWO DETECTABLE WARNINGS AT THE ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE ARE NOT REQUIRED. ONLY ONE IS REQUIRED JUST AT THE EDGE OF THE CONCRETE LANDINGS AND THE ASPAHLT PAVING PRIOR TO ENTERING THE MARKED CROSSING AREA. a. PROVIDE A LARGE SCALE DETAIL ON THE MARKED CROSSING TO ALVERNON ROAD OF BOTH ENDS OF THE MARKED CROSSING SHOWING ALL COMPLIANT DIMENSIONS, SLOPES, RAMPS, DETECTABLE WARNINGS AND SPOT GRADES TO SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION S 404, 406.12, 406 .14 AND 403.3. b. NEED A RAMP TO THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY CONCRETE PEDESTRIAN WAY? CLARIFY GRADE DIFFERENTATION WITH SPOT GRADES. 4. PROVIDE A LARGE SCALE DETAIL OF THE ACCESSIBLE PARKINGS SHOWING ALL DIMENSIONS, SLOPES (PROVIDE SPOT GRADES), RAMPS AISLES AND ACCESS TO THE CONCRETE ACCESSIBLE ROUTE (CONCRETE WALKWAY). a. PROVIDE AN ACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGNAGE DETAIL WITH "VAN ACCESSIBLE" SIGNAGE. END OF REVIEW |
| 03/11/2009 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | Provide the rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole and the first floor elevation. Determine the need for a backwater valve per Section 710.1, UPC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson. |