Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Number: T08CM02288
Parcel: 120063210

Address:
4301 S 6TH AV

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: SITE

Permit Number - T08CM02288
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
07/02/2008 RONALD BROWN ZONING HC SITE REVIEW Denied 2 JULY 2008
T08CM02288/RETAIL-OFFICE STORES
REVIEWED BY RON BROWN

ACCESSIBLE REVIEW
2006 IBC/ICC 117.1

DENIED: SEE COMMENTS BELOW

SHEET C-03
1. DETAIL 1:
a. AS PER 2006 IBC/ICC 117.1, SECTION 502.4.3, ACCESS AISLES SHALL EXTEND THE FULL LENGTH OF THE PARKING SPACES THEY SERVE. MAKE AISLE 18'-0" LONG, MOVE 4' WIDE LOADING RAMP UP TO TOP EDGE OF EXTENDED AISLE AND MAKE IT SIX FEET LONG
b. RELOCATE SIGN TO CENTER LINE OF PARKING SPACE AND JUST OUTSIDE THE REQUIRED 18' LENGTH REQUIRED.
c. CORRECT SCALE TO 3/16"
2. DETAIL 7:
a. BOTTOM OF MAIN SIGN TO BE 7' ABOVE FINISHED GRADE.
3. DETAIL 12:
a. MINIMUM WIDTH OF SIDEWALK TO BE 4'
b. MAXIMUM SLOPE TO BE 1:12

END OF REVIEW
07/03/2008 MARTIN BROWN FIRE REVIEW Approved
07/08/2008 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Denied DSD TRANSMITTAL

FROM: Steve Shields
Lead Planner

PROJECT: 4301 S. 6th
T08CM02288
Site Plan (1st Review)

TRANSMITTAL DATE: July 8, 2008

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed.

1. This site plan was reviewed for compliance with the City of Tucson Development Standards (D.S.) and Land Use Code (LUC) for full code compliance.

2. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.7 The building setback shown to E. Columbia Street is not correct. This setback should be twenty-one (21) feet measured from the nearest travel lane.

3. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.8 Zoning acknowledges Detail 3/C3, provide a detail for a standard vehicle parking space.

4. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.9 Zoning acknowledges Detail 4/C3, clarify how the bicycle parking will be lit.

5. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.11 Per Pavement Improvement Plan I-97-064, Sheet 11, As-Built, the entrance parking area access lane (Driveway) off of E. Columbia Street is only twenty (20) feet wide. Show the drive as built.

6. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.12 Per D.S. 2-08.3.1 provide the accessible route to the refuse location.

7. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.13 if applicable provide the location, type, size and height of existing and proposed freestanding signage and billboards.

8. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.14 A ten (10) foot by eighteen (18) foot loading space is required.

9. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.20 If applicable show all easements of record graphically on the plan together with recording docket and page reference.

10. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.25 If applicable provide existing and proposed freestanding lighting layout and type. Provide a detail; list the height of pole and type of lighting.

11. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.28 Show the existing zoning of the adjacent parcels, including those across streets and alleys. Provide the zoning for the parcels on the other side of both streets.

12. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.31 Provide the existing and proposed use on the plan. Zoning acknowledges that under "ZONING INFORMAITON - ART.2: ZONES" you have shown allowed use change this to proposed and add the existing.

13. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.31 Zoning acknowledges that 300 gal. roll-out bins are proposed. Provide documentation from solid waste that approves this type of refuse collection.

14. D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.3 Provide Zoning acknowledges the allowed Floor Area Ratio (FAR) provided, provide the proposed FAR on the plan.

15. D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.4 Provide a parking calculation that shows the total number of required and provided vehicle parking spaces.

16. D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.5 The loading space calculation is not correct. Per 3.4.5.6 one (1) ten (10) by eighteen (18) foot loading space is required.

17. Additional comments may be forth coming depending on how each comment has been addressed.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956.

C:\planning\site\t08cm02288

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised site plan and additional requested documents.
07/18/2008 PETER MCLAUGHLIN NPPO REVIEW Approved NPPO Exception.
07/18/2008 PETER MCLAUGHLIN LANDSCAPE REVIEW Denied 1. Both the proper and common name of each type of plant material must be listed and a separate symbol must be used for each species of canopy tree, shrub, and groundcover. Include locations, size, and proper and common names of all proposed as well as existing vegetation to remain in place. Provide a legend to indicate the type of vegetation. DS 2-07.2.2.A.d

2. Within vehicular use areas, one (1) canopy tree is required for each 10 motor vehicle parking spaces and every parking space shall be located within forty (40) feet of the trunk of a canopy tree (as measured from the center of the tree trunk) per LUC 3.7.2.3.A.1.a

3. Landscape plan shall include complete irrigation specification design and layout per DS 2-06.5.4.A & DS 2-06.5.4.B including source of irrigation, sleeves for driveways and sidewalks, locations of valves, low-flow bubblers or drip irrigation. The irrigation lines are not shown in all required locations.

4. An interior landscape border is required adjacent to the R-3 zoned property to the east in the area where the dumpster is located and where the water harvesting basin is. Relocate dumpster to allow room for the required landscape border. Detail all required landcsaping and irrigation within the interior landscape border. Revise the keynote label 13 in this area to indicate that this is a interior landcape border, not a street landscape border. LUC Table 3.7.2-I

5. Revise the landscape plan to include the following calculations:
a. Square footage of the site.
b. Square footage of the oasis allowance area and calculation if applicable.

6. Revise the 6th Avenue street landscape border calculation to indicate that with 90 linear feet of border a minimum of 3 canopy trees are required. LUC 3.7.2.4

7. Specify use of decomposed granite within the right-of-way.

8. Any changes to the site plan must be reflected in the landscape plan. LUC 3.7.2.7

9. Additional comments may apply upon resubmittal.
07/18/2008 BIANCA RAMIREZ ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied DATE: July 18, 2008
SUBJECT: Site Only
TO: Jaca Design
LOCATION: 4301 S 6th Ave, T14S, R13E, Section 36, Ward 5
REVIEWERS: Bianca Ramirez, CFM
ACTIVITY: T08CM02288 (First Review)


RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Site Plan

SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Development Services Department has received and reviewed the proposed site plan for the above referenced property. Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the site plan at this time. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal.

Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the site plan.

Site Plan:

1. The most recent aerial photo of the building does not match what is depicted on the site plan. Please modify site plan to represent actual footprint of building and/or clarify. If there have been demolition permits issued indicate demolition permit numbers on the site plan.
2. Site plan is to meet all minimum Federal ADA requirements. See comments from Ron Brown, RA, Structural Plans Examiner for all handicap access requirements.
3. Please revise location map to include section 6 and to provide the Section, Township and Range per D.S. 2-02.2.1.4.
4. Provide all existing and proposed buildings and structures, including location, size, height, overhangs, canopies, and use per D.S. 2-02.2.1.6. Aerial photo indicated that there are two (2) structures on the site.
5. Verify that all Sight Visibility Triangles have been labeled and depicted correctly per D.S. 2-02.2.1.10.
6. DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.12: Revise the site plan to show the required 6-foot wide sidewalk with curb along the street frontage of 6th Ave. Label and dimension on the site plan. Per the adopted Mayor and Counsel policy all sidewalks along MS&R right-of-ways for arterial and collector streets require 6-foot wide sidewalks.
7. There does not appear to be a loading zone provided on site plan. See zoning requirements for loading zone requirements. Fully dimensioned loading space(s) and maneuvering area(s) per D.S. 2-02.2.1.14.
8. Please provide Drainage patterns and finished grades per D.S. 2-02.2.1.16.
9. Please list estimated cut & fill quantities per D.S. 2-02.2.1.17.
10. DS Sec.2.02.2.1.A.16: Provide drainage arrows and locations of all concentration points. Specifically show roof down spout locations proposed buildings at pedestrian circulation areas. A detail for the dimension of the proposed scuppers that are used for collecting onsite roof drainage at all pedestrian sidewalk is required, refer to City of Tucson details. Any scuppers proposed under the sidewalk will be designed and constructed to convey the 10-year flood flow. Provide a drainage statement showing scupper calculations that demonstrate that the 10-year flood flow is contained under the sidewalk.
11. Provide a note stating that the site plan is in conformance with the MS&R overlay zone criteria.
12. DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.19: Label the 9-foot future sidewalk and curb area on the site plan to verify that all improvements are located outside of the future ROW. Indicate whether identified roads are public or private.
13. Verify that all easement of record must be graphically shown on the plan together with recording docket and page per D.S. 2-02.2.1.20.
14. Dimension from street monument lines to existing and proposed curbs, sidewalks, driveways, and utility lines per D.S. 2-02.2.1.21.
15. Please provide existing topographic contours at intervals not exceeding two (2) feet and/or spot elevations as pertinent and Bench Mark based on City of Tucson Datum, including City Field Book and page number per D.S. 2-02.2.1.23.
16. Verify that all fences, walls, or vegetation for screening and sight visibility are shown by type, material, height, location and spacing per D.S. 2-02.2.1.27.
17. Show site plan activity number in the lower right hand corner of each sheet per D.S. 2-02.2.1.29.
18. Per conversation at counter the location of the refuse container is to be modified for location and access thereto per D.S. 2-02.2.1.32 and D.S. 6-01.0. Ensure that refuse detail meets all the minimum standards, including but not limited to the concrete approach slab. Refer to Figure 3, 6-01 for refuse container details.
19. DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.32: Label and show the maneuverability for refuse vehicles in plan view at the proposed refuse container location. Current positioning of trash area does not allow for 14' X 40' clear approach, show access dimensioning to proposed trash enclosure. Skewing trash enclosure should address this problem.
20. Pedestrian access is required to the location of the trash enclosure. Please provide stripped crosswalk across PAAL for pedestrian access.
21. A permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information.
22. Please show a typical cross section of the P.A.A.L. or call out the percentage of slopes. Call out the grade break at the driveway, if applicable.
23. List the owner/developer on the plans with the pertinent information.
24. Add note: "Depress all landscaped areas 6" maximum for water harvesting".
25. All symbols on plans need to be indicated in legend. Indicate all symbols in legend.
26. DS 3-05.2.2.D -Provide dimension for back up spur.
27. Verify that all keynotes are referenced to appropriate area(s).
28. Change handicap FINE amount to read $518.
29. 2-02.2.1.A.8: Dimension existing parking along Columbia Street.
30. Additional comments may be forthcoming.

Hydrologic/Hydraulic Report:

1. Provide explanation of how parcel is affected by properties located to the east of parcel.
2. Verify that discharge is adequately represented in report.
3. Provide calculations for standard weir and orifice calculations as outlined within report.
4. Provide manning's n calcuation(s) as referenced in report.
5. Provide drainage exhibit defining the drainage characteristics for the design of the project.
Verify that the exhibit shows that Q's entering and exiting the site. In addition, identify that locations of the basins and drainage features such as weirs and orifice(s). Include any setbacks from the proposed buildings.
6. Provide Geotechnical Report for minimum setback recommendations and perc tests.
7. Revise drainage report and project design to meet the minimum critical basin requirements per 10-01.2.1.
8. Additional comments may be forthcoming.


If you have any questions, I can be reached at 837-4928 or Bianca.Ramirez@tucsonaz.gov

Bianca C. Ramirez
Engineering Associate
City of Tucson/Development Services Department
201 N. Stone Avenue
P.O. Box 27210
Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210
(520) 837-4928 office
(520) 879-8010 fax

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
07/31/2008 VFLORES1 OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
07/31/2008 SUE REEVES REJECT SHELF Completed