Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

The login landing page when selecting 'View' is still occurring and is still pending further investigation. 

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T08CM02132
Parcel: 121080080

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: SITE

Permit Number - T08CM02132
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
07/01/2008 DAVE MANN FIRE REVIEW Approved
07/01/2008 RBROWN1 ADA REVIEW Passed NOT A COT PROJECT
07/01/2008 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Denied DSD TRANSMITTAL

FROM: Steve Shields
Lead Planner

PROJECT: Allsport Academy
T08CM02132
Site Plan (1st Review)

TRANSMITTAL DATE: July 2, 2008

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed.

1. This site plan was reviewed for compliance with the City of Tucson Development Standards (D.S.) and Land Use Code (LUC) for full code compliance.

2. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.5 Provide the lot bearings on the plan.

3. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.6 For the existing building provide overall dimensions, height, overhangs, canopies and use on the plan.

4. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.8 The drop-off space shown at the southeast corner is not allowed within the sight visibility triangle (SVT), relocate.

5. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.8 Based on the last approved restriping plan and current aerial photos it appears that a re-strip is proposed for the south parking area. Provide a detail for a standard vehicle parking space.

6. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.9 On the provided off-street bicycle parking, including materials for lighting.

7. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.10 As the right-of-way for Speedway Blvd. is not at future width show the future SVT's on the plan.

8. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.11 The southern entrance parking area access lane (PAAL) off of Speedway Blvd. Does not meet the minimum twenty-four (24) foot width for a PAAL with 90 degree parking.

9. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.12 The dimensions shown near the Class 2 bicycle parking do not appear to add up. There is a six (6) foot plus an eight (8) foot dimension that equals fourteen (14) feet and then near the bicycle parking there is a five (5) foot and a four (4) foot along with the required six (6) foot bicycle parking which equals fifteen (15) feet, please clarify.

10. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.12 It does not appear that the four (4) minimum with for a sidewalk is maintained between the proposed handicapped ramp and the existing planter, please clarify.

11. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.13 If applicable provide the location, type, size and height of existing and proposed freestanding signage and billboards.

12. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.19 Show the future right-of-way for Speedway Blvd. on the plan.

13. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.20 If applicable show all easements of record graphically on the plan together with recording docket and page reference.

14. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.21 Show the future curb on the plan.

15. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.25 If applicable provide existing and proposed freestanding lighting layout and type. Provide a detail; list the height of pole and type of lighting.

16. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.28 Show the existing zoning of the adjacent parcels, including those across streets and alleys.

17. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.31 Under "LAND USE CODE DATA: USAGE:" the existing use should be listed as "ALOCHOLIC BEVERAGE SERVICE" and the proposed use should be "EDUCATIONAL USE: clarify if this is an Elementary or Secondary School and add the subject to: "Sec. 3.5.3.7" to the proposed use.

18. D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.2 Under "LAND USE CODE DATA: GROSS ARE" clarify if this is building gross area or what?

19. D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.3 Provide a Floor Area Ration (FAR), allowed and provided, on the plan.

20. D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.4 Until the use is clarified, Elementary or Secondary School see comment 17 above, the parking calculation can not be verified.

21. D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.4 In the parking calculation provide the required and provided number of parking spaces.

22. D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.4 The bicycle parking spaces calculation appears to be incorrect. Per LUC 3.3.4 CIVIC USE GROUP, Educational Use, Bicycle: One (1) space per ten (10) students and employees. The bicycle parking calculation does not appear to include the employees.

23. D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.5 Under the "LAND USE CODE DATA: REQUIRED LOADING" revise the LUC reference to read "3.4.5.4" and provide the number of loading spaces provided. Also please clarify what a "LADONG SPACE" is.

24. Additional comments may be forth coming depending on how each comment has been addressed.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956.

C:\planning\site\t08cm02132

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised site plan and additional requested documents.
07/01/2008 RONALD BROWN ZONING HC SITE REVIEW Denied 1 JULY 2008
T08CM02132/ALL SPORT ACADEMY
REVIEWED BY RON BROWN

ACCESSIBLE REVIEW
2006 IBC/ICC 117.1

DENIED: SEE COMMENTS BELOW

SITE PLAN
1. CLARIFY SLOPES OF CONCRETE WALK (ACCESSIBLE ROUTE) WITH SPOT GRADES AS PER ICC 117.1, SECTION 403.3.
2. IDENTIFY "VAN ACCESSIBLE" SPACE
3. ACCESS AISLE RAMP DOES NOT WORK. NEEDS 4' WIDE LANDING AT TOP OF RAMP AND 4' CLEARANCE AROUND PLANTER BOX. REDESIGN AND PROVIDE LARGE SCALE DETAIL.
KEYED NOTES
4. NOTE 2 NEEDS TO READ "2006 IBC/ICC 117.1, SECTION 405 AND 406" NOT "COT 207". DETECTABLE WARNINGS NOT REQUIRED IN THIS SITUATION BY ICC 117.1, OWNER'S OPTION.
5. NOTE 4, NO DETAIL 14, SHEET 5 PROVIDED
CURB ACCESS RAMP DETAIL
6. FLARED SIDES NO GREATER THAN 1:10 SLOPE, SECTION 406.3
7. I DON'T THINK THREE RAMPS CONVERGING ON ONE ANOTHER ALL AT THE SAME SLOPE OF 1:12 WILL WORK AS DETAILED. GEOMETRICALLY IMPOSSIBLE. BETTER RETHINK THIS ONE
8. ADD THIS DETAIL TO HANDICAP (ACCESSIBLE) PARKING SPACE LAYOUT DETAIL ABOVE.
HANDICAP (ACCESSIBLE)/VAN ACCESSIBLE PARKING AND STANDARD PARKING
9. SHOW MAX 2% SLOPE FOR ALL ACCESSIBLE PARKING AREAS
10. DRAW IN RAMP, ACCESSIBLE ROUTE WALKWAY, PLANTER, BUILDING EDGE, AND INCLUDE BOTH ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES PLUS DIMENSIONS AND SLOPE COMPLIANCES.
HANDICAP (ACCESSIBLE) PARKING SIGN
11. PROVIDE A "VAN ACCESSIBLE" SIGN ATTACHED TO THE POLE.

END OF REVIEW
07/03/2008 PETER MCLAUGHLIN LANDSCAPE REVIEW Denied 1. Within vehicular use areas, one (1) canopy tree is required for each 10 motor vehicle parking spaces or fraction thereof, and every parking space shall be located within forty (40) feet of the trunk of a canopy tree (as measured from the center of the tree trunk) per LUC 3.7.2.3.A.1.a. Revise plan drawing to include required canopy trees for new parking area and provide a canopy tree calculation on a landscape/irrigation plan.

2. Provide a copy of the last approved landscape plan and site plan. Additional comments may apply upon resubmittal.
07/03/2008 PETER MCLAUGHLIN NPPO REVIEW Passed
07/24/2008 JASON GREEN ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied DATE: July 24, 2008
SUBJECT: 6211 E Speedway Blvd Site Plan- Engineering Review
TO: Moses Montoya
LOCATION: T14S R14E Sec01 Ward 6
REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM
ACTIVITY: T08CM02132 (Site Plan)


SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Development Services Department has received and reviewed the site plan (T08CM02132) for the above referenced property. Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the site plan application at this time. The following items need to be addressed:


SITE PLAN COMMENTS:

1) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.5: Revise the site plan to provide the lot bearing along with the shown lot dimensions.

2) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.8: Revise the site plan to label and dimension the existing vehicular use area (north side of building) to verify conformance with the minimum requirements of DS Sec.3-05. Or provide a copy of the last approved site plan that shows the existing vehicular use areas to be in conformance with the Development Standards.

3) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.8: Revise the site plan to dimension the minimum 24-foot PAAL widths for all two-way traffic (12-foot for one-way traffic unless used as a Fire Access Lane then 20-foot minimum) at all locations on the site plan. All driveway entrances must also meet the minimum 24-foot width requirements for 2-way traffic.

4) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.8: Revise the site plan to clearly dimension wheel stop barrier or curbing for the parking spaces located along any adjacent landscape areas and/or pedestrian circulation paths. The barriers are to be set at 15.5-feet to accommodate the required 2.5-foot overhang to prevent encroachment or damage to the proposed landscape area and/or the required clear 4-foot pedestrian path.

5) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.8: Refer to comments from Ron Brown, RA Structural Plans Examiner for all handicap and ANSI Standard requirements that apply to this project.

6) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.10: Revise the site plan to provide the future sight-visibility triangles (SVTs) for all existing driveways. Improvements can not be located within either the existing or future SVTs, revise the plan accordingly.

7) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.19: Revise the site plan to label Speedway Blvd as a Public Road. Clearly label the centerline of the road.

8) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.19: Revise the site plan to label the shown right-of-way for Speedway Blvd as existing. Label and dimension the future MS&R right-of-way width (120-feet) for Speedway Blvd on the site plan.

9) DS Sec.2-01.2.1.A.20: Verify that all existing easements are drawn with recordation information, location, width, and purpose of on the site plan.

10) DS Sec.2-01.2.1.A.21: Provide dimensions from the street monument lines to the existing curb line and label and dimension the future right-of-way, future curb and 6-foot sidewalk.

11) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.32: Revise the site plan to provide a detail to show that the existing refuse enclosure meets the minimum requirements of DS Sec.6-01. Refer to DS Sec.6-01.4.2 for specifications and requirements on access, placement of containers, bin enclosure and construction.

12) Be advised that further comments may be forth coming on resubmittal of the site plan.


GENERAL COMMENTS:

Please provide a revised site plan that addresses the comments provided above. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments. Enclose "redlines" with the resubmittal package.

Further comments may be generated upon resubmittal of the site plan review.

If you have any questions or to schedule an appointment I can be reached at 837-4929.




Jason Green, CFM
Senior Engineer Associate
Engineering Division
COT Development Services

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
08/06/2008 CPIERCE1 OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
08/06/2008 SUE REEVES REJECT SHELF Completed