Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL NEW
Permit Number - T08CM01578
Review Name: COMMERCIAL NEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/21/2008 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 05/22/2008 | RAY MAJUTA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 05/27/2008 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. SHEET G1; CODE REQUIREMENTS SUMMARY: REFERENCED CODE SECTIONS AND TABLES FOR OCCUPANT LOAD/NUMBER OF EXITS/MAXIMUM TRAVEL DISTANCE ARE INCORRECT. VERIFY. 2. GENERAL: 1/8" LETTERING ON ALL DRAWINGS IS REQUIRED UNLESS A WRITTEN APPEAL IS APPROVED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL, JESSIE SANDERS. THIS APPROVED APPEAL MUST ACCOMPANY DRAWINGS SUBMITTED FOR CHECKING. 3. SHEET A5; ELEVATION 3: VERTICAL GRAB BAR IS REQUIRED PER ANSI A117.1, FIG. 604.5.1. 4. SHEET A5; ELEVATION 3: LOCATE TOILET TISSUE DISPENSER PER ANSI A117.1, FIG. 604.7. 5. SHEET A5; ELEVATION 3 AND 5: REMOVE QUESTION MARKS. 6. SHEET A1; FLOOR PLAN: HIGH/LOW DRINKING FOUNTAIN (OR POINT OF USE FOUNTAIN) IS REQUIRED PER IBC 1109.5.1. SINCE DRINKING FOUNTAIN IS ON THE EXTERIOR, SHOW IT ON THE SITE PLAN ALONG WITH ACCESSIBILITY. 7. SHEET S0.1; GENERAL NOTES: ALL DEFERRED SUBMITTALS MUST BE APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL. THIS APPROVED APPEAL MUST ACCOMPANY DRAWINGS SUBMITTED FOR CHECKING. 8. SHEET S0.1; STANDARD STRUCTURAL NOTES: NOTE I INDICATES 2003 IBC. VERIFY ALL DESIGN MEETS THE 2006 IBC. 9. SHEET S0.1; STANDARD STRUCTURAL NOTES; NOTE III: 3000 P.S.I. CONCRETE REQUIRES SPECIAL INSPECTION PER IBC 1704.4(2.3). 10. SHEET S1.1; FOUNDATION PLAN: KEYNOTE 5 SHOULD BE NOTED AS 'TYPICAL AT RE-ENTRANT CORNERS'. VERIFY. 11. CALCULATIONS PAGE 1: REVIEW CALCULATIONS AND REVISE AS REQUIRED TO MEET 2006 IBC. VERIFY. |
| 05/27/2008 | JOHN WILLIAMS | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Completed | Impact Fee's Do Apply; Southeast District; 1,702 Square Feet; $8,296.19 |
| 06/02/2008 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | 06/02/2008 Development Services Department Zoning Review Section Terry Stevens Lead Planner Comments: 1. The building plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning could not verify that the building plan was in compliance with the approved development plan. Please submit two copies of the approved and stamped development, landscape, and NPPO plans with the next building plan submittal. 3. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved site/development plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming. |
| 06/18/2008 | LAITH ALSHAMI | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | Laith Alshami, Engineering and Floodplain Review, 06/19/2008 Esperanza En Escalante (T08CM01578, Ref. D06-0002) The subject project has been reviewed. The Building Plan can not be approved at this time. Submit two copies of the approved and stamped development plan with the next building plan submittal in order to verify that the building plan is in compliance with the approved Development Plan. |
| 06/18/2008 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 06/20/2008 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Provide energy code compliance calculations. Reference: Section 101.4, International Energy Conservation Code 2006. 2. Provide sufficient detail on the drawings to evaluate the energy compliance of the building envelope. The information shall, as a minimum, include U-factors of the envelope systems and fenestration components, along with the R-values of the insulation. Reference: Section 104.2, IECC 2006. 3. Provide information to show that the termination of the restroom exhaust complies with the requirements of Section 401.4.2, IMC 2006. The fan schedule calls for a wall cap located above the drinking fountain but the general notes call for a roof cap. 4. Provide information on the sequence of operation for the restroom exhaust to show that recirculation of the air from the restroom will not occur (i.e. note that the exhaust fan shall operate continuously when the building is occupied). Reference: Section 403.2.1, IMC 2006. |
| 06/20/2008 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Provide a site drawing showing the size, route, and slope of the building sewer and the location of the water meter and backflow preventer. Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006. |
| 06/20/2008 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Provide a letter from Tucson Water confirming that the use of a 5/8" water meter (3/4" meters are not available from Tucson Water) will be allowed for this project (18.5 fixture units equates to a demand of 13 GPM) |