Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: REVISION - - 1ST
Permit Number - T08CM01562
Review Name: REVISION - - 1ST
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/08/2009 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 10/15/2009 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | The addressing shown on the plans (Buildings 1A, 1B, 2A, 2B, etc) does not correspond to the recorded addresses (Buildings 1, 2, 3, 4, etc.). Revise the plans as required match the records or see Addressing in Pima County to resolve the situation. |
| 10/16/2009 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. The addressing shown on the plans (Buildings 1A, 1B, 2A, 2B, etc) does not correspond to the recorded addresses (Buildings 1, 2, 3, 4, etc.). Revise the plans as required match the records or see Addressing in Pima County to resolve the situation. 2. Revise the riser diagram 2/P1.2 to comply with the requirements of Section 909.1, IPC 2006 (wet venting is restricted to bathroom groups). 3. The scupper design for this building (detail 2/A4.2) shows a 3" dam prior to the overflow. Full flow across the overflow weir is not established with less than 2" of head above the weir. Has the structural design of the roof taken this additional load into account? Reference: Section 1611.1, IBC 2006 and 1107.3, IPC 2006. |
| 10/21/2009 | RAY MAJUTA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11/04/2009 | CPIERCE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 11/04/2009 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |