Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE
Permit Number - T08CM01560
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/20/2008 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Denied | Per C.O.T. amendments to the 2006 IFC (Section 508), distance to fire hydrant(s) exceeds allowable distances. Install fire sprinklers or an additional hydrant. |
| 06/20/2008 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. NO MORE THAN 20% OF THE CONSTRUCTION BUDGET MUST BE ATTRIBUTED TO ACCESSIBLE UPGRADES. PROVIDE SUMMARY AND COST BREAKDOWN ANALYSIS. 2. PROVIDE ACCESSIBLE ROUTE CONNECTION TO BELLEVUE STREET R.O.W. WALK WAY. 3. HOW DOES EXISTING ACCESSIBLE PARKING GET TO CONCRETE ACCESSIBLE ROUTE WALKWAY? 4. NEW COVERED ACCESSIBLE ROUTE WALKWAY TO BE CONCRETE WALK WAY WITH 6" HIGH CURB. 5. PROVIDE SLOPES OF EXISTING AND NEW CONCRETE ACCESSIBLE ROUTE. 6. IDENTIFY ONE ACCESSIBLE SPACE AS VAN ACCESSIBLE 7. PROVIDE PARKING SIGN DETAIL 8. CONNECT CONCRETE ACCESSIBLE ROUTE WALKWAY OF BOTH BUILDING ACCESSIBLE ROUTES. 9. NEW ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE DOES NOT WORK. REDESIGN AND SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH 2006 IBC/ICC117.1, SECTIONS 405, 406 AND 502. SHOW ACCESS TO ACCESSIBLE ROUTE. |
| 06/27/2008 | HEATHER THRALL | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Heather Thrall Senior Planner PROJECT: T08CM01560, 3830 E. Bellevue Street New Building for existing Office site "Our Family Facility" 1st Review TRANSMITTAL DATE: June 27, 2008 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with redlines and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. This project was reviewed for compliance with the Land Use Code (LUC) and Development Standards (DS). Site plan content was reviewed under DS 2-02. 2. This project was reviewed solely for the new development area, and is under a 25% expansion, which would have required full code compliance. 3. Per DS 2-02.2.1.6, regarding buildings; A) for records and permits, please provide a height and dimension the existing and proposed addition footprint on the south building. B) provide an explanation or documentation as to why the south building is located over the east property line. Check with building codes on this issue as well. C) an aerial photo and last approved site plan show a carport to the south side of the main building. This site plan omits it. Call it out, or if it is to be demolished, provide demo permit number. D) darken location of covered walkway for greater clarity (appears it's along back up spur but hard to see E) dimension covered walkway for permitting, records and inspections F) note vertical clearance 7' minimum please for covered walkway. G) declare use of new building - offices? Storage? Both - specify please. H) is there a perimeter wall or fence on the west lot line - keynote 4. Per DS 2-02.2.1.8, regarding parking: A) in detail of typical parking, show wheel stops for all spaces to allow 2'6" overhang and a minimum of a 15'6" deep parking space before the wheel stop B) in spaces behind large office building, show that the spaces will be a minimum of 15'6" deep before the wheel stop. Show distance from wheel stop to wall of building. C) provide wheel stops for new parking at southeast. D) declare width of first parking space on right side of PAAL that enters off the alley - must be 10' wide when abutting vertical object over 6" in height, per DS 3-05.2.1.B.2 Or show that the fence is 1'6" away from parking space. E) per DS 3-05.2.1.B.2, enlarge parking space width next to dumpster to 10' 5. Per DS 2-02.2.1.9, regarding bicycle parking: A) Per LUC 3.3.3.5 and 3.3.4, provide 2 bike spaces, one class 1 and 1class 2 - as the site has 9 new parking spaces, bike parking should be provided for the new addition. B) provide a detail of the two types of bike parking C) provide class 2 bike parking within 50' of main building entry. 6. Per DS 2-02.2.1.11, provide dimension for new back up spur in middle parking lot. Ensure depth in accordance with DS 3-05. Note, back up spur must be 3' away from building - appears covered walk way may be an issue if supports in way of spur. 7. Per DS 2-02.2.1.12, regarding pedestrian access: A) declare sidewalk width under covered walkway B) declare sidewalk route under covered walkway with darkened lines 8. Per DS 2-02.2.1.13 declare any new free-standing lighting and signage with heights. 9. Per DS 2-02.2.1.14, per LUC 3.4.5.6., for combined square footage of new addition and existing structure, provide one loading zone space at 10x18 and provide in a calculation. 10. Per DS 2-02.2.1.20, please note all recordation information for easements. 11. Per DS 2-02.2.2.A.2 & 3, please provide a floor area ratio calculation for each building in relation to the square footage of the site - and an overall floor area ratio. 12. Please note, depending upon responses, further review comments may be forthcoming. I may be reached at Heather.Thrall@tucsonaz.gov or at 837-4951. HCT C:\planning\site\DSD\T08CM01560 3830 e bellevue.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised site plan |
| 06/30/2008 | BIANCA RAMIREZ | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: June 30, 2008 SUBJECT: Site TO: Reliable Permits LOCATION: 3830 E Bellevue Street, T14S, R14E, Section 4, Ward 6 REVIEWERS: Bianca Ramirez, CFM ACTIVITY: T08CM01560 (First Review) RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Site Plan SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Development Services Department has received and reviewed the proposed site plan for the above referenced property. Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the site plan at this time. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the site plan. Site Plan: 1. Please provide project address per D.S. 2-02.2.1.3. 2. Please provide section corners, north arrow and scale of 3" = 1mile clearly labeled per D.S. 2-02.2.1.4. 3. Label and dimension existing and future sight visibility triangles per D.S. 2-02.2.1.10. 4. Clearly label all points of egress and ingress including locations and width of driveways and parking area access lanes (P.A.A.L.) per D.S. 2-02.2.1.11. 5. Provide drainage patterns per D.S. 2-02.2.1.16. 6. Provide cut and fill quantities per D.S. Sec.2-02.2.1.17. It appears that cut and fill will not be occurring for the proposed development. However, as part of the site submittal requirement estimated cut and fill quantities are required to be indicated on the plans so that it is clear to the inspector that no cut in fill is to be taking place. If not cut and fill is taking place indicate the quantity of zero (0) on the plan. Estimated cut and Fill: Cut = 0 and Fill = 0 will suffice. 7. Label dimensioned right-of-way for Winstel Avenue per D.S. 2-02.2.1.19. Label all streets as either local or public. 8. DS Sec. 2-05.2.4.H.2: Provide the right-of-way (ROW) recordation information for Winstel Avenue and Bellevue Street. 9. Verify that all easement of record have been graphically shown on the plan together with recording docket and page per D.S. 2-02.2.1.20. 10. Dimension and label from street monument lines to existing and proposed curbs, sidewalks, driveways, and utility lines per D.S. 2-02.2.1.21. 11. Verify that all fences, walls, or vegetation for screening and sight visibility by type, material, height, location and spacing have been indicated on plan per D.S. 2-02.2.1.27. 12. Show site plan number in the lower right hand corner of sheet per D.S. 2-02.2.1.29. 13. Revise refuse container detail to reflect the minimum standards as depicted on detail. See enclosed detail for reference. 14. A permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information. 15. List the owner/developer information on the plans with the pertinent information (name, address, phone number). 16. Additional comments may be forthcoming. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 837-4928 or Bianca.Ramirez@tucsonaz.gov Bianca C. Ramirez Engineering Associate City of Tucson/Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 837-4928 office (520) 879-8010 fax |
| 07/02/2008 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | NPPO | REVIEW | Passed | No exisiting vegetation within building/vehicular use expansion areas. |
| 07/02/2008 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Landscaping requirements apply to expansion of existing development as follows: On sites where the gross floor area of the existing building(s) is more than ten thousand (10,000) square feet, expansion in square footage of land area, floor area, lot coverage, or vehicular use area as follows: If the expansion is less than 25%, the requirements of this Division apply only to the proposed expansion. Existing development on the site is subject to the zoning regulations in effect at the time the existing development received zoning approval per LUC 3.7.1.2.B Within the new/expanded vehicular use area, one (1) canopy tree is required for each 10 motor vehicle parking spaces or fraction thereof and every parking space shall be located within forty (40) feet of the trunk of a canopy tree (as measured from the center of the tree trunk) per LUC 3.7.2.3.A.1.a. Provide a landscape plan and irrigation plan showing the required parking lot canopy tree(s) within the parking expansion area along with a calculation for the number of required/provided canopy trees for the vehicle use area per DS 2-07.2.2.A.2.c. 2. The site plan parking calculation states that 64 parking spaces are provided for the site but only 63 are shown on the drawing. Also, only 9 parking spaces are depicted within the vehicle use area expansion in the southwest corner of the site but the number on the drawing states 10. Also, there are only 3 shown on the drawing in the northwest corner of the site where it states on the drawing that there are 5 spaces. Revise/correct parking numbers as necessary. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 07/24/2008 | DELMA ROBEY | APPROVAL SHELF | Completed |
| 07/24/2008 | DELMA ROBEY | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 07/24/2008 | DELMA ROBEY | REJECT SHELF | Completed |